| Literature DB >> 31797504 |
Martijn F Hoes1, Jasper Tromp1,2,3, Wouter Ouwerkerk2,4, Nils Bomer1, Silke U Oberdorf-Maass1, Nilesh J Samani5, Leong L Ng5, Chim C Lang6, Pim van der Harst1, Hans Hillege1, Stefan D Anker7,8,9, Marco Metra10, Dirk J van Veldhuisen1, Adriaan A Voors1, Peter van der Meer1.
Abstract
AIMS: Cathepsin D is a ubiquitous lysosomal protease that is primarily secreted due to oxidative stress. The role of circulating cathepsin D in heart failure (HF) is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the association between circulating cathepsin D levels and clinical outcomes in patients with HF and to investigate the biological settings that induce the release of cathepsin D in HF. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: BIOSTAT-CHF; Biomarkers; Cathepsin D; Heart failure; Human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31797504 PMCID: PMC7754332 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Heart Fail ISSN: 1388-9842 Impact factor: 15.534
Baseline characteristics of patients from the BIOSTAT‐CHF index cohort according to tertiles of cathepsin D
| 1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 725 | 725 | 724 | |
| Demographics | ||||
| Age (years) | 68.4 (12.2) | 68.7 (11.8) | 69.6 (12.2) | 0.140 |
| Female sex | 213 (29.4%) | 170 (23.4%) | 198 (27.3%) | 0.035 |
| HF type | ||||
| HFrEF | 538 (80.3%) | 531 (81.4%) | 503 (80.6%) | 0.910 |
| HFmrEF | 85 (12.7%) | 82 (12.6%) | 76 (12.2%) | |
| HFpEF | 47 (7.0%) | 39 (6.0%) | 45 (7.2%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.4 (5.4) | 27.9 (5.4) | 28.2 (5.7) | 0.030 |
| Ischaemic aetiology | 306 (42.9%) | 308 (43.6%) | 337 (47.1%) | 0.220 |
| NYHA class | ||||
| I | 75 (10.3%) | 59 (8.1%) | 51 (7.0%) | 0.028 |
| II | 356 (49.1%) | 337 (46.5%) | 310 (42.8%) | |
| III | 178 (24.6%) | 209 (28.8%) | 236 (32.6%) | |
| IV | 23 (3.2%) | 23 (3.2%) | 29 (4.0%) | |
| NA | 93 (12.8%) | 97 (13.4%) | 98 (13.5%) | |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 125.1 (23.0) | 124.1 (20.9) | 124.3 (22.1) | 0.640 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 74.9 (13.3) | 75.2 (13.2) | 74.0 (13.4) | 0.190 |
| LVEF (%) | 31.5 (10.6) | 30.7 (10.7) | 31.1 (11.0) | 0.450 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 77.8 (18.3) | 80.6 (20.8) | 81.9 (19.5) | <0.001 |
| Signs and symptoms | ||||
| Peripheral oedema | ||||
| Not present | 287 (49.0%) | 244 (41.6%) | 202 (32.1%) | <0.001 |
| Ankle | 167 (28.5%) | 189 (32.2%) | 174 (27.7%) | |
| Below knee | 105 (17.9%) | 128 (21.8%) | 174 (27.7%) | |
| Above knee | 27 (4.6%) | 26 (4.4%) | 79 (12.6%) | |
| Elevated JVP | 133 (25.7%) | 140 (28.1%) | 220 (41.3%) | <0.001 |
| Hepatomegaly | 89 (12.3%) | 76 (10.5%) | 137 (19.1%) | <0.001 |
| Orthopnoea | 197 (27.2%) | 259 (35.8%) | 298 (41.3%) | <0.001 |
| Medical history | ||||
| Anaemia | 244 (34.9%) | 236 (34.3%) | 279 (39.6%) | 0.074 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 298 (41.1%) | 348 (48.0%) | 345 (47.7%) | 0.012 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 198 (27.3%) | 234 (32.3%) | 269 (37.2%) | <0.001 |
| COPD | 107 (14.8%) | 137 (18.9%) | 129 (17.8%) | 0.095 |
| Hypertension | 447 (61.7%) | 452 (62.3%) | 448 (61.9%) | 0.960 |
| PAVD | 77 (10.6%) | 79 (10.9%) | 84 (11.6%) | 0.830 |
| Stroke | 69 (9.5%) | 57 (7.9%) | 79 (10.9%) | 0.140 |
| PCI | 143 (19.7%) | 143 (19.7%) | 163 (22.5%) | 0.320 |
| Medication | ||||
| Loop diuretics | 719 (99.2%) | 723 (99.7%) | 721 (99.6%) | 0.310 |
| ACEi/ARB at baseline | 528 (72.8%) | 529 (73.0%) | 502 (69.3%) | 0.220 |
| Beta‐blocker at baseline | 609 (84.0%) | 603 (83.2%) | 595 (82.2%) | 0.650 |
| Aldosterone antagonist | 382 (52.7%) | 399 (55.0%) | 361 (49.9%) | 0.140 |
| Laboratory | ||||
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.2 (1.8) | 13.3 (1.9) | 13.1 (2.0) | 0.038 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.3 (3.5, 5.1) | 4.2 (3.4, 5.1) | 3.8 (3.1, 4.9) | <0.001 |
| IL‐6 (pg/mL) | 4 (2.4, 7.4) | 5.1 (2.7, 9.5) | 7.2 (4, 15.4) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 64 (50, 80) | 63 (47, 78) | 57 (42, 76) | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 99 (81122) | 104 (85, 129) | 106 (87, 141) | <0.001 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 140.0 (138.0, 142.0) | 140.0 (137.0, 142.0) | 139.0 (136.0, 141.0) | <0.001 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.3 (3.9, 4.6) | 4.3 (3.9, 4.6) | 4.2 (3.9, 4.6) | 0.014 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.2 (5.6, 6.8) | 6.2 (5.8, 7.2) | 6.6 (5.9, 7.5) | 0.006 |
| NT‐proBNP (ng/L) | 3576.5 (2015.0, 7000.0) | 3763.0 (2110.0, 7520.0) | 5040.0 (2921.5, 9782.5) | <0.001 |
| Troponin I (μg/L) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.1) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.1) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.1) | 0.012 |
ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IL‐6, interleukin‐6; JVP, jugular venous pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NA, not available; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PAVD, peripheral arterial vascular disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Clinical characteristics and laboratory values associated with cathepsin D
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta |
| Beta |
| |
| Age (years) | 0.06 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.531 |
| Sex | 0.01 | 0.545 | ||
| BMI | 0.06 | 0.004 | 0.10 | 0.013 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 0.08 | <0.001 | 0.03 | 0.484 |
| Hypertension | −0.02 | 0.316 | ||
| Diabetes | 0.08 | <0.001 | 0.08 | 0.049 |
| eGFR | −0.09 | <0.001 | −0.08 | 0.059 |
| NT‐proBNP | 0.15 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 0.014 |
| Aldosterone | 0.01 | 0.786 | ||
| Renin | 0.07 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.037 |
| AST | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| ALT | 0.09 | 0.001 | −0.10 | 0.086 |
| CRP | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.05 | 0.236 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C‐reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide;
Figure 1Cumulative incidence curves for the combined outcome of heart failure‐related hospitalizations and/or all‐cause mortality at 2 years (A) and all‐cause mortality at 2 years (B).
Hazard ratios in predicting the combined endpoint (heart failure hospitalizations or all‐cause mortality at 2 years)
| Combined outcome | All‐cause mortality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Univariable | 1.38 (1.26–1.52) | <0.001 | 1.46 (1.30–1.64) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.36 (1.24–1.49) | <0.001 | 1.41 (1.26–1.59) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.31 (1.19–1.44) | <0.001 | 1.40 (1.25–1.58) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.30 (1.19–1.43) | <0.001 | 1.40 (1.24–1.58) | <0.001 |
| BIOSTAT‐CHF risk model | 1.12 (1.02–1.23) | 0.016 | 1.15 (1.01–1.29) | 0.028 |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2 is adjusted for model 1 + body mass index, country, history of hypertension, diabetes.
Model 3 is adjusted for model 2 + beta‐blockers, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist usage at baseline.
BIOSTAT‐CHF risk model is adjusted for age, heart failure hospitalization in the year before inclusion, oedema, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, systolic blood pressure, haemoglobin, high‐density lipoprotein levels, serum sodium concentration, and failure to prescribe a beta‐blocker.
Figure 2Cathepsin D (CTSD) was released by human stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes in concert with troponin T. Extracellular levels of CTSD were elevated after stretch (A), while intracellular levels were only reduced after tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) stimulation or hypoxia (B). Damage marker release of troponin T was also increased by mechanical stretch (C). Graphs show results from three independent experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. unstimulated control human stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes unless otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was done with with a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post‐hoc test. HIF1α, hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 alpha.
Figure 3Cathepsin D (CTSD) knockdown resulted in increased cell death following mechanical stretch. Intracellular levels of CTSD were greatly reduced by shRNA‐mediated CTSD gene silencing (A); extracellular levels were found to show a similar pattern (B). Troponin T levels were found to be increased following mechanical stretch with CTSD knockdown (C). CTSD knockdown resulted in deteriorated sarcomeric structure (D). Mechanical stretch induced apoptosis regardless of CTSD knockdown (E), whereas necrosis is increased after stretch in human stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC‐CM) with CTSD knockdown (F). Stretching induced autophagy in scrambled control hPSC‐CM, which was abrogated in CTSD‐deficient cells (G). Stretching resulted in increased metabolism in hPSC‐CM with CTSD silencing exclusively (GH). Graphs show results from three independent experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 vs. static scrambled control hPSC‐CM (shSCR) unless otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was done with with a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post‐hoc test.
Figure 4Inhibition of lysosomal exocytosis by vacuolin‐1 improved autophagic response by retention of intracellular cathepsin D (CTSD). Extracellular levels of CTSD after stretch were reduced compared to stretched vehicle control stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC‐CM) (A). Incubation with vacuolin‐1 increased intracellular levels of CTSD (B). Inhibition of CTSD secretion marginally affected apoptosis (C) and prevented induction of necrosis (D). Autophagy was restored by vacuolin‐1 in CTSD knockdown hPSC‐CM after stretch (E), whereas metabolism was unaffected (F). Graphs show results from three independent experiments; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. static scrambled control hPSC‐CM (shSCR) unless otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was done with with a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post‐hoc test.