Aviv Dotan1, Rachel Bachner-Melman2,3, Sophie C Dahlenburg4. 1. Clinical Psychology Program, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel. 2. Clinical Psychology Program, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel. rachel.bachner@mail.huji.ac.il. 3. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel. rachel.bachner@mail.huji.ac.il. 4. School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Homosexuality is a clear risk factor for disordered eating in men; however, for women, research has yielded contradictory results. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between sexual orientation and disordered eating in women. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were used. Studies comparing disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women were identified using PsycNet database and Google Scholar. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Overall disordered eating, restricting, binging and purging were examined for heterosexual, lesbian, bisexual and 'mostly heterosexual' women. RESULTS: Whereas there was no significant difference in overall disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women, lesbians reported restricting less and binging more than heterosexual women. Bisexual women were more likely than lesbian women to restrict food intake and purge, and more likely than heterosexual women to have overall disordered eating and restrict food intake. "Mostly heterosexual" women were more likely than heterosexual women to restrict food intake, binge and purge. CONCLUSIONS: Women of different sexual orientations show distinct patterns of disordered eating. Bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women appear to be particularly at risk. Stress resulting from binegativity and rigid views of sexuality in a dichotomous society, rather than sexual orientation itself, may be associated with disordered eating in women. Findings should be viewed with caution because there were few studies with bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women. This study elucidates the nature of the association between disordered eating and sexual orientation. Findings provide a possible explanation for previous inconsistencies, since opposing trends for different behaviors cancel each other out. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE: Homosexuality is a clear risk factor for disordered eating in men; however, for women, research has yielded contradictory results. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between sexual orientation and disordered eating in women. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were used. Studies comparing disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women were identified using PsycNet database and Google Scholar. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Overall disordered eating, restricting, binging and purging were examined for heterosexual, lesbian, bisexual and 'mostly heterosexual' women. RESULTS: Whereas there was no significant difference in overall disordered eating between lesbians and heterosexual women, lesbians reported restricting less and binging more than heterosexual women. Bisexual women were more likely than lesbian women to restrict food intake and purge, and more likely than heterosexual women to have overall disordered eating and restrict food intake. "Mostly heterosexual" women were more likely than heterosexual women to restrict food intake, binge and purge. CONCLUSIONS:Women of different sexual orientations show distinct patterns of disordered eating. Bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women appear to be particularly at risk. Stress resulting from binegativity and rigid views of sexuality in a dichotomous society, rather than sexual orientation itself, may be associated with disordered eating in women. Findings should be viewed with caution because there were few studies with bisexual and "mostly heterosexual" women. This study elucidates the nature of the association between disordered eating and sexual orientation. Findings provide a possible explanation for previous inconsistencies, since opposing trends for different behaviors cancel each other out. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Vivienne M Hazzard; Melissa Simone; Skylar L Borg; Kelley A Borton; Kendrin R Sonneville; Jerel P Calzo; Sarah K Lipson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: April J Ancheta; Billy A Caceres; Sarah S Zollweg; Kristin E Heron; Cindy B Veldhuis; Nicole A VanKim; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2021-08-16