Literature DB >> 31797319

The additive prognostic value of coronary calcium score (CCS) to single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI)-real world data from a single center.

Vinoda Sharma1, Lal Mughal2, Gerasimos Dimitropoulos2, Awais Sheikh2, Michael Griffin2, Alexandra Moss2, Alp Notghi2, Manish Pandit2, Derek L Connolly2, Chetan Varma2, Paulus Kirchhof2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging [SPECT-MPI] is a functional test for coronary ischemia. We aimed to assess the additive prognostic value of coronary calcium score (CCS) to SPECT-MPI in stable patients.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 655 patients who underwent SPECT-MPI with CCS (2012 to 2017). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) identified CCS cutoff value for all-cause mortality: CCS+ if > cutoff value and MPI+ if ≥ 5% total perfusion defect (TPD). Patients were divided into 1 MPI-/CCS-; 2 MPI+/CCS-; 3 MPI-/CCS+; 4 MPI+/CCS+ and compared. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified predictors of mortality.
RESULTS: CCS cutoff for all-cause mortality was > 216 (C statistic 0.756, P < 0.0001). In MPI+ groups, mean TPD was similar (13.4% and 13.1% respectively) but mortality was higher in the CCS+ (12.5% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.22) as was the severe LV systolic dysfunction (8.0% vs. 0%, P = 0.095). In MPI- groups, mean TPD was similar (0.7% and 0.9% respectively) but all-cause mortality was higher in the CCS+ (10.7% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.0001) as was severe LVSD (2.9 % vs. 0.3% P = 0.016). Age, smoking, renal impairment ,and CCS > 216 were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with raised CCS on SPECT-MPI have increased mortality and poor LV function despite a negative MPI.
© 2019. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD; CT; MPI; SPECT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31797319     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01965-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  39 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women.

Authors:  Y Kwok; C Kim; D Grady; M Segal; R Redberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in the distribution of first-order branch vessels, using an anatomical matching of angiographic and perfusion data.

Authors:  J G Schwartz; R B Johnson; F C Aepfelbacher; J A Parker; L Chen; R R Azar; R A Parker; P G Danias
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.690

4.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Thomas Mayrhofer; Maros Ferencik; Daniel Bittner; Kerry L Lee; Michael T Lu; Adrian Coles; James Jang; Mayil Krishnam; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Gender differences in the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a bivariate meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aline Iskandar; Brendan Limone; Matthew W Parker; Andrew Perugini; Hyejin Kim; Charles Jones; Brian Calamari; Craig I Coleman; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prevalence and prognostic value of perfusion defects detected by stress technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus and no known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Andrea De Lorenzo; Ronaldo S L Lima; Aristarco G Siqueira-Filho; Mauricio R Pantoja
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Predictive values of Framingham risk and coronary artery calcium scores in the detection of obstructive CAD in patients with normal SPECT.

Authors:  James J Jang; Ashok Krishnaswami; Yun-Yi Hung
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Laurie LaBree; Stanley P Azen; Terence M Doherty; Robert C Detrano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.

Authors:  Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberta Green; Valeria Cantoni; Wanda Acampa; Roberta Assante; Emilia Zampella; Carmela Nappi; Valeria Gaudieri; Teresa Mannarino; Renato Cuocolo; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is SPECT LVEF assessment more accurate than CT at higher heart rates? More evidence for complementary information in multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The impact of coronary calcium score as an addition to myocardial perfusion imaging in altering clinical management (ICCAMPA trial).

Authors:  Pavithra S Jayadeva; Stephen Stowers; E W Tang; Joao Vitola; Rodrigo Cerci; Jessica Yao; James Westcott; Barry Elison; Nathan Better
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging and CAC score: Not only a brick in the wall.

Authors:  Emilia Zampella; Roberta Assante; Wanda Acampa
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium score: A marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Nataliya Pyslar; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Utilising combined MPI and CACS results.

Authors:  Joseph C Lee; Vishva A Wijesekera
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kameel Kassab; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.952

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.