Matthew A Brown1,2, Dan Chen3, Lusi Ye3, Yuncai Liu4, Qinqin Xiao4, Ledan Dong4, Caiyun Wen4, Zhang Zhang3, Mengmeng Jin3. 1. Centre for Precision Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. matt.brown@kcl.ac.uk. 2. Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust and King's College London NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, England. matt.brown@kcl.ac.uk. 3. Department of Rheumatology, First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015, Zhejiang, China. 4. Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325015, Zhejiang, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of conventional radiography, ldCT, and MRI in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Patients presenting with > 3 months chronic back pain were assessed by axSpA-experienced rheumatologists and diagnosed as axSpA or not; axSpA patients were then considered nr-axSpA or AS using plain radiography. Non-axSpA patients were recruited as controls, and divided into non-inflammatory and inflammatory groups on the basis of inflammatory back pain and/or CRP/ESR elevation. Clinical variables, pelvic radiography, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) ldCT, and SIJ MRI were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included and had SIJ radiography and ldCT, of whom 71 additionally had an SIJ MRI. These included 23 non-inflammatory controls, 21 inflammatory controls, 32 nr-axSpA cases, and 45 AS cases. Fourteen of 32 (44%) nr-axSpA patients had positive ldCT scans, 21/24 (88%) had MRI-BMO, and 11/24 (46%) had MRI-structural lesions. ldCT had high specificity with only 1/23 (4%) non-inflammatory controls being positive. MRI-BMO had the highest sensitivity for nr-axSpA, but compared with ldCT lower specificity, with 5/15 (33%) of non-inflammatory controls being positive, and similar sensitivity for AS (20/22 (91%) vs 44/44 for ldCT). CONCLUSIONS: ldCT identifies evidence of radiographic change in a significant proportion of nr-axSpA cases and is highly specific for axSpA. MRI-BMO lesions are more sensitive than either conventional radiography or MRI-structural assessment for axSpA. The relative position of these imaging modalities in screening for axSpA needs to be reconsidered, also taking into account the costs involved.Key Points• ldCT is more sensitive for erosions or sclerosis in axSpA than plain radiography, with 44% of patients with nr-axSpA having evidence of AS-related sacroiliac joint changes on ldCT.• MRI-structural lesions are no more sensitive but are less specific for AS than ldCT.• MRI-BMO is the most sensitive test for nr-axSpA of the modalities tested but is less specific for axSpA than for ldCT.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of conventional radiography, ldCT, and MRI in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS:Patients presenting with > 3 months chronic back pain were assessed by axSpA-experienced rheumatologists and diagnosed asaxSpA or not; axSpApatients were then considered nr-axSpA or AS using plain radiography. Non-axSpApatients were recruited as controls, and divided into non-inflammatory and inflammatory groups on the basis of inflammatory back pain and/or CRP/ESR elevation. Clinical variables, pelvic radiography, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) ldCT, and SIJ MRI were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included and had SIJ radiography and ldCT, of whom 71 additionally had an SIJ MRI. These included 23 non-inflammatory controls, 21 inflammatory controls, 32 nr-axSpA cases, and 45 AS cases. Fourteen of 32 (44%) nr-axSpApatients had positive ldCT scans, 21/24 (88%) had MRI-BMO, and 11/24 (46%) had MRI-structural lesions. ldCT had high specificity with only 1/23 (4%) non-inflammatory controls being positive. MRI-BMO had the highest sensitivity for nr-axSpA, but compared with ldCT lower specificity, with 5/15 (33%) of non-inflammatory controls being positive, and similar sensitivity for AS (20/22 (91%) vs 44/44 for ldCT). CONCLUSIONS: ldCT identifies evidence of radiographic change in a significant proportion of nr-axSpA cases and is highly specific for axSpA. MRI-BMO lesions are more sensitive than either conventional radiography or MRI-structural assessment for axSpA. The relative position of these imaging modalities in screening for axSpA needs to be reconsidered, also taking into account the costs involved.Key Points• ldCT is more sensitive for erosions or sclerosis in axSpA than plain radiography, with 44% of patients with nr-axSpA having evidence of AS-related sacroiliac joint changes on ldCT.• MRI-structural lesions are no more sensitive but are less specific for AS than ldCT.• MRI-BMO is the most sensitive test for nr-axSpA of the modalities tested but is less specific for axSpA than for ldCT.
Authors: Freek de Bruin; Anoek de Koning; Rosaline van den Berg; Xenofon Baraliakos; Juergen Braun; Sofia Ramiro; Floris A van Gaalen; Monique Reijnierse; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M Rudwaleit; R Landewé; D van der Heijde; J Listing; J Brandt; J Braun; R Burgos-Vargas; E Collantes-Estevez; J Davis; B Dijkmans; M Dougados; P Emery; I E van der Horst-Bruinsma; R Inman; M A Khan; M Leirisalo-Repo; S van der Linden; W P Maksymowych; H Mielants; I Olivieri; R Sturrock; K de Vlam; J Sieper Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: P Mandl; V Navarro-Compán; L Terslev; P Aegerter; D van der Heijde; M A D'Agostino; X Baraliakos; S J Pedersen; A G Jurik; E Naredo; C Schueller-Weidekamm; U Weber; M C Wick; P A C Bakker; E Filippucci; P G Conaghan; M Rudwaleit; G Schett; J Sieper; S Tarp; H Marzo-Ortega; M Østergaard Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Lin Yi; Jiucun Wang; Xinjian Guo; Maribel G Espitia; Enuo Chen; Shervin Assassi; Li Jin; Hejian Zou; John D Reveille; Xiaodong Zhou Journal: Open Rheumatol J Date: 2013-08-19
Authors: Steven L Truong; Tim McEwan; Paul Bird; Irwin Lim; Nivene F Saad; Lionel Schachna; Andrew L Taylor; Philip C Robinson Journal: Rheumatol Ther Date: 2021-12-28
Authors: Gabriel Adelsmayr; Andreas Haidmayer; Christopher Spreizer; Michael Janisch; Franz Quehenberger; Eva Klocker; Winfried Graninger; Michael Fuchsjäger; Josef Hermann Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2021-12-11
Authors: Zhixiu Li; Sjef M van der Linden; Muhammad Asim Khan; Heinz Baumberger; Hermine van Zandwijk; Mohammad Kazim Khan; Peter M Villiger; Matthew A Brown Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-05