| Literature DB >> 31796859 |
Alexander Dutsch1,2,3, Paul J M Wijnker1,2,4, Saskia Schlossarek1,2, Felix W Friedrich1,2, Elisabeth Krämer1,2, Ingke Braren1,2,5, Marc N Hirt1,2, David Brenière-Letuffe1,2, Alexandra Rhoden1,2, Ingra Mannhardt1,2, Thomas Eschenhagen1,2, Lucie Carrier6,7, Giulia Mearini8,9.
Abstract
Phosphorylation of cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), encoded by MYBPC3, increases the availability of myosin heads for interaction with actin thus enhancing contraction. cMyBP-C phosphorylation level is lower in septal myectomies of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) than in non-failing hearts. Here we compared the effect of phosphomimetic (D282) and wild-type (S282) cMyBP-C gene transfer on the HCM phenotype of engineered heart tissues (EHTs) generated from a mouse model carrying a Mybpc3 mutation (KI). KI EHTs showed lower levels of mutant Mybpc3 mRNA and protein, and altered gene expression compared with wild-type (WT) EHTs. Furthermore, KI EHTs exhibited faster spontaneous contractions and higher maximal force and sensitivity to external [Ca2+] under pacing. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer of D282 and S282 similarly restored Mybpc3 mRNA and protein levels and suppressed mutant Mybpc3 transcripts. Moreover, both exogenous cMyBP-C proteins were properly incorporated in the sarcomere. KI EHTs hypercontractility was similarly prevented by both treatments, but S282 had a stronger effect than D282 to normalize the force-Ca2+-relationship and the expression of dysregulated genes. These findings in an in vitro model indicate that S282 is a better choice than D282 to restore the HCM EHT phenotype. To which extent the results apply to human HCM remains to be seen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31796859 PMCID: PMC6890639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54665-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Molecular phenotype on mRNA and protein levels after Mybpc3 gene transfer. Single wild-type (WT) and knock-in (KI) EHTs either non-transduced (NT) or transduced with AAV6 (MOI 1,000 vg/cell) encoding wild-type cMyBP-C (S282) or phosphomimetic cMyBP-C (D282) were used to extract total RNA and were pooled (200 ng RNA/sample; 3 EHTs per group) prior to reverse transcription. (a) Representative agarose gel of RT-PCR with different primer pairs. Amplicon sizes are shown on the right. Few lanes of the gels were excluded (dotted line). (b) Total Mybpc3 mRNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR with SYBR Green. (c–e) The levels of wild-type and mutant Mybpc3 transcripts were determined by RT-qPCR with specific TaqMan probes. Schemes below show localization of primers (black triangle) and probes. (f) Heatmap showing expression of selected genes (threshold <0.7-fold or >1.3-fold change vs. WT EHTs) coding for proteins regulated in hypertrophy, Ca2+-handling and K+/Na+-regulation as well as components of the sarcomere. (g) Representative Western blot stained with antibodies directed against FLAG-cMyBP-C and total cMyBP-C. (h) Quantification of total cMyBP-C level in single EHTs (WT n = 12; KI-NT n = 10; KI-S282 n = 7; KI-D282 n = 7) normalized to α-actinin and related to WT EHTs. (i) Representative blots stained with specific antibodies against Ser-273, Ser-282 and Ser-302 with and without isoprenaline treatment (15 min, 100 nM). α-Actinin served as a cardiac specific loading control. Few lanes of the blots were excluded (dotted lines). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 vs. WT, one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (KI-NT, S282 and D282 vs WT EHTs).
Figure 2Immunofluorescence images of EHTs of different genotypes. KI EHTs were transduced during casting with AAV6-S282 or -D282 at MOI of 1,000 vg/cell. After 16 days WT, KI-NT, KI-S282 and KI-D282 EHTs were fixed and co-stained with antibodies directed against α-actinin (green) and (a) total cMyBP-C (red) or (b) exogenous FLAG-tagged cMyBP-C (red). Nuclei were stained with DRAQ5 (blue). Scale bars = 20 µm. Higher magnifications (zoom-in) images for cMyBP-C/FLAG-cMyBP-C and merge are shown on the right side. Scale bars = 5 µm.
Figure 3Analysis of contractile parameters in EHTs under spontaneous contraction with video-optical recording. (a) A representative image of an EHT as recorded by the video camera within the analysis software and evaluated by automated figure recognition (blue squares). Measurements were performed in EHT culture medium containing 1.8 mM external [Ca2+]. (b) Schematic contraction peak displaying the evaluated parameters of force, time to contraction (T120%) and time to relaxation (T220%), contraction velocity (CV) and relaxation velocity (RV). (c) Maximal forces under spontaneous beating activity of EHTs of different genotypes. Maximal force values were recorded on the day of highest force development. (d) Rate of spontaneous beating of EHTs on the day of highest force development (e) Contraction time (T120%) and (f) relaxation time (T220%) were measured from baseline to 20% of peak height and from peak height to 20% of baseline, respectively, in all EHT groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Numbers of EHTs/batches in all panels: WT 51/5; KI-NT 61/7; KI-S282 26/5; KI-D282 20/5. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. WT, one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (KI-NT, S282 and D282 vs WT EHTs).
Contractile parameters in EHTs under spontaneous contraction.
| WT | KI-NT | KI-S282 | KI-D282 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of values | 51 | 61 | 26 | 20 |
| Force (µN) | 35.73 ± 2.32 | 42.52 ± 2.06 | 42.04 ± 4.10 | 43.4 ± 5.28 |
| Rate (bpm) | 174 ± 6 | 207 ± 7** | 173 ± 8 | 167 ± 13 |
| Contraction velocity (µN/ms) | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 1.06 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.10 | 1.01 ± 0.12 |
| T120% (ms) | 63.41 ± 2.86 | 52.84 ± 1.99** | 55.46 ± 1.94 | 65.80 ± 5.57 |
| Relaxation velocity (µN/ms) | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 0.82 ± 0.1 |
| T220% (ms) | 104.70 ± 5.38 | 87.98 ± 3.63* | 91.00 ± 7.23 | 99.50 ± 11.19 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Groups were compared with the one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test vs WT. *P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs WT EHTs.
Figure 4Contractility analysis of EHTs under electrical stimulation. EHTs were exposed to Tyrode’s solution containing different external [Ca2+] (0.1–1.8 mM) and paced at a murine physiological frequency (6 Hz) at culture days 14–16. (a) Maximal force of contraction of the different groups at 1.8 mM external [Ca2+] and (b) corresponding contraction time (T120%) and (c) relaxation time (T220%). (d) Relative force-[Ca2+] curves with calculated EC50 values. (e) Effect of 100 nM isoprenaline (Iso) on force at submaximal [Ca2+] (0.4 mM). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. WT n = 15; KI-NT n = 8; KI-S282 n = 6; KI-D282 n = 7. **P < 0.01 vs. WT one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (KI-NT, S282 and D282 vs WT EHTs). #P < 0.05 vs. corresponding baseline, paired Student’s t-test (panel e). Concentration response curves were fitted to the data points and curve comparison was done by using extra sum-of-squares F-test, log-EC50 was different for each data set. P = 0.0008 (panel d).
Contractile parameters in paced EHTs.
| WT | KI-NT | KI-S282 | KI-D282 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of values | 8 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
| Force (µN) | 33.87 ± 1.95 | 46.25 ± 2.34** | 35.50 ± 2.59 | 40.43 ± 3.87 |
| Contraction velocity (µN/ms) | 1.11 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.05** | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.0.08 |
| T120% (ms) | 48.00 ± 0.92 | 48.00 ± 1.43 | 50.50 ± 1.33 | 50.71 ± 1.32 |
| Relaxation velocity (µN/ms) | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.05 |
| T220% (ms) | 69.73 ± 1.96 | 75.75 ± 3.54 | 75.17 ± 2.36 | 73.57 ± 1.54 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Groups were compared with the one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnet’s multiple comparison test vs WT. **P < 0.01 vs WT EHTs.