Literature DB >> 31796573

Diabetes INSIDE: Improving Population HbA1c Testing and Targets in Primary Care With a Quality Initiative.

Roy E Furman1, Timothy S Harlan2, Lesley LeBlanc3, Elise C Furman1, Greg Liptak4, Vivian A Fonseca2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve outcomes of patients with adult type 2 diabetes by decreasing HbA1c undertesting, reducing the proportion of patients with poor glycemic control, and lowering mean HbA1c levels using a quality improvement (QI) program. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six years of outpatient electronic health record (EHR) data were analyzed for care gaps before and 2 years after implementing a QI initiative in an urban academic medical center. QI strategies included 1) individual provider and departmental outcome reports, 2) patient outreach programs to address timely follow-up care, 3) a patient awareness campaign to improve understanding of achieving clinical goals, 4) improving EHR data capture to improve population monitoring, and 5) professional education.
RESULTS: Analysis (January 2010 to May 2018) of 7,798 patients from Tulane Medical Center (mean age 61 years, 57% female, 62% black, 97% insured) with 136,004 visits showed target improvements. A Cox proportional hazards model controlling for age, sex, race, and HbA1c level showed a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c undertesting >6 months (hazard ratio 1.20 ± 0.07). Statistical process control charts showed 15.5% relative improvement in the patient proportion with HbA1c >9% (75 mmol/mol) from 13% to 11% (P < 10-6) following QI interventions and a 2.1% improvement of population mean HbA1c from 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) to 7.2% (55 mmol/mol) (P < 10-6).
CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary QI teams using EHR data to design interventions for providers and patients produced statistically significant improvements in both care process and clinical outcome goals.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31796573     DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  3 in total

1.  What Gets Measured Gets Improved-Setting Standards and Accreditation for Quality Improvement for Diabetes Services in Australia.

Authors:  Sofianos Andrikopoulos; Steven James; Natalie Wischer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-19

2.  Improving Diabetes Control Using Lean Six Sigma Quality Improvement in an Endocrine Clinic in a Large Accountable Care Organization.

Authors:  Usha Kollipara; Mario Rivera-Bernuy; Joseph Putra; Jessica Burks; Amber Meyer; Shayla Ferguson; Carolyn Nelson; Jackie Mutz; Sasan Mirfakhraee; Puneet Bajaj; Asra Kermani; Jason S Fish; Sadia Ali
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-01

3.  Impact of Quality Improvement (QI) Program on 5-Year Risk of Diabetes-Related Complications: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Hui Shao; Vivian Fonseca; Roy Furman; Luigi Meneghini; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 17.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.