Literature DB >> 31795899

1/2SH: A Simple, Accurate, and Reliable Method of Calculating the Hematoma Volume of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Biao Zhao1, Wan-Bing Jia1, Li-Ying Zhang2, Ting-Zhong Wang1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- 1/2ABC has been used widely for assessing the volume of intracerebral hematoma. However, it is only suitable for calculating regular and small volume hematomas. Therefore, we re-explored the formula of hematoma volume to find a method that can calculate hematoma volumes accurately, reliably, and quickly. Methods- Computed tomography imaging data of 257 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were collected. Hematoma volumes were estimated using 3-dimensional Slicer and 7 formulas (π/6ABC, 1/2ABC, 1/3ABC, 2/3SH, 1/2SH, π/6SH, and 2.5/6ABC). Taking the hematoma volumes measured by 3-dimensional Slicer as the reference standard, the accuracy and reliability of the 7 formulas were evaluated. Furthermore, the time needed to calculate hematoma volumes by the 1/2SH method was noted for further analysis. Results- (1) The accuracy of the 7 formulas based on the error analysis from the highest to the lowest was: π/6SH, 1/2SH, 2.5/6ABC, 1/3ABC, 1/2ABC, and π/6ABC or 2/3SH. According to concordance analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the results from the highest to lowest were as follows: 1/2SH, π/6SH, 2.5/6ABC, 1/3ABC, 1/2ABC, 2/3SH, and π/6ABC. After categorizing cases according to size, shape, and location of hematoma, the results were almost the same as the results for overall accuracy evaluation in any subgroup. (2) Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 1/2SH in intra and inter-researcher were 0.998 and 0.989, respectively. For the formula π/6SH, intraclass correlation coefficient was the same as that of 1/2ABC. Kappa values of 1/2SH for intra- and inter-observer were 0.992 and 0.913, respectively. For π/6SH, kappa values of within- and between-reader were 0.984 and 0.904, respectively. (3) The average time taken to calculate hematoma volumes by 1/2SH was 74 seconds. Conclusions- The 1/2SH and π/6SH are accurate, reliable, and rapid methods for calculating hematoma volumes. The accuracy and reliability of 1/2SH were slightly higher than those of π/6SH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral hemorrhage; hematoma; methods; retrospective studies; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795899     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  3 in total

1.  Dorsal Root Ganglion Volumetry by MR Gangliography.

Authors:  S Weiner; M Strinitz; J Herfurth; F Hessenauer; C Nauroth-Kreß; T Kampf; G A Homola; N Üçeyler; C Sommer; M Pham; M Schindehütte
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Simple Ways to Estimate Meningioma Volume: Can ABC- and SH-Derived Methods Be Used in Clinical Practice Reliably?

Authors:  Dongdong Xiao; Jun Liu; Tingting Hu; Burkutally Mohammad Shah Nayaz; Xiaobing Jiang; Fangcheng Zhang; Pengfei Yan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.375

3.  A Longitudinal Research on the Distribution and Prognosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Gangqiang Lin; Xueqian Xu; Xiaoqian Luan; Huihua Qiu; Shengfang Shao; Qingsong Wu; Wei Xu; Guiqian Huang; Jincai He; Liang Feng
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.