Literature DB >> 31795698

Generalizability of clinically measured acoustic reflexes to brief sounds.

Kristy K Deiters1, Gregory A Flamme1, Stephen M Tasko1, William J Murphy2, Nathaniel T Greene3, Heath G Jones3, William A Ahroon3.   

Abstract

Middle ear muscle contractions (MEMC) can be elicited in response to high-level sounds, and have been used clinically as acoustic reflexes (ARs) during evaluations of auditory system integrity. The results of clinical AR evaluations do not necessarily generalize to different signal types or durations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of observing MEMC in response to brief sound stimuli (tones, recorded gunshots, noise) in adult participants (N = 190) exhibiting clinical ARs and excellent hearing sensitivity. Results revealed that the presence of clinical ARs was not a sufficient indication that listeners will also exhibit MEMC for brief sounds. Detection rates varied across stimulus types between approximately 20% and 80%. Probabilities of observing MEMC also differed by clinical AR magnitude and latency, and declined over the period of minutes during the course of the MEMC measurement series. These results provide no support for the inclusion of MEMC as a protective factor in damage-risk criteria for impulsive noises, and the limited predictability of whether a given individual will exhibit MEMC in response to a brief sound indicates a need to measure and control for MEMC in studies evaluating pharmaceutical interventions for hearing loss.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795698      PMCID: PMC7043895          DOI: 10.1121/1.5132705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  55 in total

1.  Safety and clinical performance of acoustic reflex tests.

Authors:  L L Hunter; D T Ries; R S Schlauch; S C Levine; W D Ward
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Analysis of army-wide hearing conservation database for hearing profiles related to crew-served and individual weapon systems.

Authors:  William A Ahroon; Melinda E Hill; Dennis P Goodes
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Predicting mechanical damage to the organ of Corti.

Authors:  G Richard Price
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Auditory brainstem circuits that mediate the middle ear muscle reflex.

Authors:  Sudeep Mukerji; Alanna Marie Windsor; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09-23

6.  Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jérôme Bourien; Yong Tang; Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Marc Lenoir; Sabine Ladrech; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Relationships between acoustic reflex patterns elicited by unfiltered white noise and narrow band white noise stimuli of different duration but of the same intensity.

Authors:  G Rossi; P Solero; M Rolando
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Acoustic reflex patterns according to different intensity and different duration of white noise (WN) stimuli.

Authors:  G Rossi; P Solero
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Cameron J Fackler; Elliott H Berger; Peter B Shaw; Mike Stergar
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

View more
  1 in total

1.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.