| Literature DB >> 31795483 |
Damilola D Olatinwo1, Adnan Abu-Mahfouz1,2, Gerhard Hancke1,3.
Abstract
In ubiquitous health-care monitoring (HCM), wireless body area networks (WBANs) are envisioned as appealing solutions that may offer reliable methods for real-time monitoring of patients' health conditions by employing the emerging communication technologies. This paper therefore focuses more on the state-of-the-art wireless communication systems that can be explored in the next-generation WBAN solutions for HCM. Also, this study addressed the critical issues confronted by the existing WBANs that are employed in HCM. Examples of such issues include wide-range health data communication constraint, health data delivery reliability concern, and energy efficiency, which are attributed to the limitations of the legacy short range, medium range, and the cellular technologies that are typically employed in WBAN systems. Since the WBAN sensor devices are usually configured with a finite battery power, they often get drained during prolonged operations. This phenomenon is technically exacerbated by the fact that the legacy communication systems, such as ZigBee, Bluetooth, 6LoWPAN, and so on, consume more energy during data communications. This unfortunate situation offers a scope for employing suitable communication systems identified in this study to improve the productivity of WBANs in HCM. For this to be achieved, the emerging communication systems such as the low-power wide-area networks (LPWANs) are investigated in this study based on their power transmission, data transmission rate, data reliability in the context of efficient data delivery, communication coverage, and latency, including their advantages, as well as disadvantages. As a consequence, the LPWAN solutions are presented for WBAN systems in remote HCM. Furthermore, this research work also points out future directions for the realization of the next-generation of WBANs, as well as how to improve the identified communication systems, to further enhance their productivity in WBAN solutions for HCM.Entities:
Keywords: 5G; LPWAN; LoRa; NB-IoT; Sigfox; WBAN; cloud computing; energy efficiency; health-care monitoring; medical nanosensors
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795483 PMCID: PMC6929153 DOI: 10.3390/s19235268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Comparison of related survey works on low-power wide-area networks (LPWAN) communication networks in health-care monitoring (HCM) and implementation design.
| Reference | Focus on | Concept of LPWAN Solution in HCM | Concept of LPWAN Solution in WBANs | LPWAN Implementation Design WBANs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | X | ✓ | ✓ | X |
| [ | X | ✓ | ✓ | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | X | X | X |
Figure 1Wireless body area network communication tiers.
Figure 2Sigfox wireless body area networks (WBAN) system architecture.
Figure 3LoRa wireless body area networks (WBAN) system architecture.
Figure 4Extended Coverage Global System for Mobile Communication (EC-GSM) cell communication coverage to remote medical center in WBANs.
Figure 5NB-IoT communication for WBANs in HCM.
Comparison of LPWAN communication systems.
| Communication Solution Parameters | Proprietary-Based LPWAN Communication Systems | Non-Proprietary Based LPWAN Communication Systems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPMA/Ingenu | Sigfox | LoRa | LTE-M1 | EC-GSM | NB-IoT | |
| Transmission power | __ | 14 dBm [ | 15 dBm [ | 20 dBm [ | 33 dBm [ | 20 dBm or 23 dBm [ |
| Battery lifespan | 10 years | 5 years [ | 10 years [ | 10 years [ | 10 years [ | More than 10 years [ |
| Data rate | 20 kbps [ | 100 bps [ | 50 kbps [ | 1 Mbps [ | 10 kbps | Downlink: 160–250 kbps Uplink: 160–200 kbps [ |
| Latency of health data | 10 s [ | 10 s [ | 10 s [ | 150 ms [ | __ | <10 s [ |
| Communication range/Link budget | Rural: 10 km | Rural: 50 km | Rural: 15 km | Rural: 15 km | Rural: 15 km | Rural: 35 km |
| Topology/Network | Star, tree/WAN | Star/WAN | Star/WAN | Star/WAN | Star/WAN | Star/WAN |
| Deployment cost | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low |
| Carrier frequency | 2.4 GHz ISM free-licensed band | Free-licensed Sub-GHz ISM band | Free-licensed Sub-GHz ISM band | Licensed Sub-GHz | Licensed Sub-GHz | Licensed Sub-GHz |
| Network capacity per cell | More than 50,000 sensor devices | 50,000 sensor devices | 40,000 sensor devices | 20,000 sensor devices | 50,000 sensor devices | More than 50,000 sensor devices |
| Security mechanism | AES 256-bit, 16 B hash [ | 140 message limit per day, scrambling techniques and encryption, signing message with private key | AES encryption | Authentication method using MME [ | Supports 3GP | Supports the 3GPP S3 mechanisms, such as device identification, identity confidentiality, health data integrity, and authentication |
| Modulation scheme | CDMA, RPMA-DSSS | DBPSK or GFSK or UNB | CSS | Downlink: FDMA | Downlink and Uplink TDMA or FDMA, GMSK and 8PSK | Downlink: OFDMA |
| Mobility support | Limited support [ | No support [ | Support [ | Support [ | Support [ | No support [ |
| Advantage | Support long communication range, energy efficiency, and low operational cost | Support long communication range, energy efficiency, and low operational cost | Support long communication range, energy efficiency, and low operational cost | Support remote health-care monitoring, energy efficient, provide fast and reliable network | Support remote health-care monitoring, energy efficient, | Support remote health-care monitoring, energy efficient provide fast and reliable network |
| Disadvantage | Interference issue, high deployment cost, and low health data reliability | Interference issue, high deployment cost, and low health data reliability | Interference issue, high deployment cost, and limited network size | Limited network capacity | Extremely low data rate | High maintenance and operational cost since it is on the licensed spectrum, also cost of SIM card purchase. |
| WBANs suitability | Low | Low | Moderate | High | Low | High |
QoS requirements for medical and nonmedical applications in WBANs.
| Application Type | Sensor Devices | Data Rate | Frequency (Hz) | Accuracy (bits) | Energy Consumption | Latency (ms) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantable medical application | Peacemaker | <1 kbps | <500 Hz | 12 | Low | <150 | [ |
| Endoscope capsule | >2 Mbps | __ | __ | High | <150 | ||
| Glucose level sensor | <1 kbps | < 50 Hz | 16 | Very low | <150 | ||
| Drug delivery capsule | <320 kbps | __ | __ | Low | <150 | ||
| Brain depth simulator | <16 kbps | 130 Hz | __ | __ | <150 | ||
| Cochlear implant | <1Mbps | 5, 12, 49 MHz | __ | __ | <150 | ||
| Wearable medical application | Blood pressure | <10 kbps | <100 Hz | 12 | High | <150 | [ |
| ECG | 3 kbps | <500 Hz | 12 | High | <150 | ||
| Blood flow rate | 480 kbps | <40 Hz | 12 | Low | <150 | ||
| Temperature | 120 bps | <1Hz | 12 | Low | <150 | ||
| Nonmedical application | Audio streaming | 1 Mbps | __ | __ | High | <250 | [ |
| Video streaming | <10 Mbps | __ | __ | High | <250 | ||
| Voice | 100 kbps | __ | __ | __ | <250 | ||
| Motion sensor | 4.8–35 kbps | 30–100 Hz (depending on the activity recognition or other tasks) | 12–16 | __ | <250 |