| Literature DB >> 31795287 |
Biao Wang1, Xiaotian Wang1, Peng Wang1, Tie Yang1, Hongkuan Yuan1, Guangzhao Wang2, Hong Chen1,3.
Abstract
Visible-light-driven photocatalytic overall water splitting is deemed to be an ideal way to generate clean and renewable energy. The direct Z-scheme photocatalytic systems, which can realize the effective separation of photoinduced carriers and possess outstanding redox ability, have attracted a huge amount of interest. In this work, we have studied the photocatalytic performance of the bilayer MoSe2/HfS2 van der Waals (vdW) heterojunction following the direct Z-scheme mechanism by employing the hybrid density functional theory. Our calculated results show that the HfS2 and MoSe2 single layers in this heterojunction are used for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), respectively. The charge transfer between the two layers brought about an internal electric field pointing from the MoSe2 layer to the HfS2 slab, which can accelerate the separation of the photoinduced electron-hole pairs and support the Z-scheme electron migration near the interface. Excitingly, the optical absorption intensity of the MoSe2/HfS2 heterojunction is enhanced in the visible and infrared region. As a result, these results reveal that the MoSe2/HfS2 heterojunction is a promising direct Z-scheme photocatalyst for photocatalytic overall water splitting.Entities:
Keywords: MoSe2/HfS2; direct Z-scheme; hybrid functional study; photocatalytic water splitting
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795287 PMCID: PMC6955844 DOI: 10.3390/nano9121706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1The equilibrium structure of the MoSe2/HfS2 nanocomposite. Orange and peacock-blue balls signify Se and Mo atoms in the MoSe2 monolayer; yellow and dodger-blue balls symbolize S and Hf atoms in the HfS2 single layer, respectively. The side view (a) and top view (b) of this heterojunction.
Bandgaps and band edge positions of the related nanosheets.
| Structure | Eg (eV) | EVBM (eV) | ECBM (eV) | Bandgap Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoSe2 | 2.02 | −5.63 | −3.61 | Direct |
| HfS2 | 1.99 | −6.93 | −4.94 | Indirect |
| MoSe2/HfS2 | 0.53 | −5.69 | −5.16 | Direct |
| MoSe2/HfS2 with −6% strain | 0.53 | −5.69 | −5.16 | Direct |
| MoSe2/HfS2 with −3% strain | 0.54 | −5.70 | −5.16 | Direct |
| MoSe2/HfS2 with 3% strain | 0.53 | −5.69 | −5.16 | Direct |
| MoSe2/HfS2 with 6% strain | 0.53 | −5.69 | −5.16 | Direct |
Figure 2Projected band structure of the MoSe2/HfS2 heterostructure. The red hexagons and blue balls represent the energy bands of the HfS2 and MoSe2 layers, respectively.
Figure 3Total and partial density of states of the MoSe2/HfS2 nanocomposite.
Figure 4Electron density difference in the MoSe2/HfS2 nanocomposite with an isovalue of 0.0001 e/Å3. Yellow and cyan areas represent accumulation and depletion, respectively. Charge density differences for the MoSe2/HfS2 heterojunction (top view (a) and side view(b)).
Figure 5The schematic illustration of the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism for the MoSe2/HfS2 nanocomposite.
Figure 6The band edge positions of the MoSe2/HfS2 nanocomposite as a function of in-plain strains.
Figure 7Optical absorption spectra of the related 2D materials and nanocomposite.