| Literature DB >> 31795264 |
Justyna Totoń-Żurańska1, Przemysław Kapusta1, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska2, Katarzyna Lorenc3, Julita Machlowska1, Anna Skalniak4, Erita Filipek5, Dorota Pawlik3, Paweł P Wołkow1.
Abstract
Anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD) encompasses a spectrum of ocular disorders affecting the structures of the anterior eye chamber. Mutations in several genes, involved in eye development, are implicated in this disorder. ASD is often accompanied by diverse multisystemic symptoms and another genetic cause, such as variants in genes encoding collagen type IV. Thus, a wide spectrum of phenotypes and underlying genetic diversity make fast and proper diagnosis challenging. Here, we used AMELIE, an automatic text mining tool that enriches data with the most up-to-date information from literature, and wANNOVAR, which is based on well-documented databases and incorporates variant filtering strategy to identify genetic variants responsible for severely-manifested ASD in a newborn child. This strategy, applied to trio sequencing data in compliance with ACMG 2015 guidelines, helped us find two compound heterozygous variants of the B3GLCT gene, of which c.660+1G>A (rs80338851) was previously associated with the phenotype of Peters plus syndrome (PPS), while the second, NM_194318.3:c.755delC (p.T252fs), in exon 9 of the same gene was noted for the first time. PPS, a very rare subtype of ASD, is a glycosylation disorder, where the dysfunctional B3GLCT gene product, O-fucose-specific β-1,3-glucosyltransferase, is ineffective in providing a noncanonical quality control system for proper protein folding in cells. Our study expands the mutation spectrum of the B3GLCT gene related to PPS. We suggest that the implementation of automatic text mining tools in combination with careful variant filtering could help translate sequencing results into diagnosis, thus, considerably accelerating the diagnostic process and, thereby, improving patient management.Entities:
Keywords: anterior segment disease; clinical genetics; diagnosis; ophthalmology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795264 PMCID: PMC6928627 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20236006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Obstetric sonogram of the fetus at 13 weeks of gestation.
Figure 2Anterior segment images of left (A) and right (B) eyes. Scale bars represent 2 mm.
Mutations discovered in the proband with possible damaging impact according to in silico analysis. Variants were sorted according to genomic coordinates.
| Gene | Mutation | Amino Acid Change | Zygosity | Segregation Analysis | gnomAD European MAF | SIFT | PROVEAN | FATHMM-XF | Mutation Taster | dbSNP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| NM_004631:c.73_74delCA | p.Gln25fs*10 | Compound Heterozygous | De novo | 3.55 × 10−4 | – | – | – | Disease causing | rs1491461533 |
| NM_004631:c.71delT | p.Leu24fs*50 | De novo | 1.79 × 10−4 | – | – | – | Disease causing | rs761955852 | ||
|
| NM_133437:c.71141G>A | p.Arg23714His | Compound Heterozygous | Maternal | 2.88 × 10−3 | Tolerated | Neutral | Benign | Polymorphism | rs200650668 |
| NM_133437:c.25190G>T | p.Ser8397Ile | Paternal | 8.52 × 10−4 | – | Deleterious | – | Disease causing | rs200335120 | ||
|
| NM_005509:c.7403_7405delATG | p.Asp2468del | Heterozygous | De novo | 9.30 × 10−5 | – | Deleterious | – | Disease causing | rs200335120 |
|
| NM_001105206:c.4665+7T>C | – | Compound Heterozygous | Maternal | 1.80 × 10−5 | – | – | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs751477013 |
| NM_001105206:c.3239G>A | p.Arg1080Gln | Paternal | 1.39 × 10−2 | Damaging | Neutral | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs41289902 | ||
|
| NM_021008.3:c.69_98del30 | p.Ala24_Ala33del | Heterozygous | De novo | 1.06 × 10−3 | – | – | – | Disease causing | rs766934551 |
|
| NM_021957:c.421G>A | p.Gly141Ser | Homozygous | Maternal, | 2.12 × 10−3 | Tolerated | Deleterious | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs149533049 |
| Paternal | ||||||||||
|
| NM_194318:c.660+1G>A | – | Compound Heterozygous | Paternal | 1.09 × 10−3 | – | – | Pathogenic (high conf.) | Disease causing | rs80338851 |
| NM_194318:c.755delC | p.Thr252fs*13 | Maternal | – | – | – | – | Disease causing | – | ||
|
| NM_001036:c.9355G>A | p.Glu3119Lys | Compound Heterozygous | Maternal | 3.06 × 10−3 | Tolerated | Deleterious | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs200830195 |
| NM_001036:c.14110G>A | p.Glu4704Lys | Paternal | 1.08 × 10−2 | Tolerated | Neutral | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs182257230 | ||
|
| NM_015868:c.44T>G | p.Leu15Trp | Heterozygous | De novo | 1.07 × 10−3 | Damaging | Deleterious | Benign | Polymorphism | rs149183658 |
| NM_015868:c.70+3G>A | – | Heterozygous | De novo | 1.34 × 10−5 | – | – | Pathogenic | – | rs776793416 | |
|
| NM_014246:c.8282C>T | p.Ser2761Leu | Compound Heterozygous | Maternal | 3.24 × 10−3 | Damaging | Deleterious | Pathogenic | Disease causing | rs144039991 |
| NM_014246:c.7313G>A | p.Arg2438Gln | Paternal | 6.34 × 10−4 | Tolerated | Neutral | Benign | Polymorphism | rs199688538 |
Results from variant mining with AMELIE and wANNOVAR software. We have showed the top five genes from each software. Variants were sorted according to AMELIE best score.
| Gene | Best AMELIE Score | AMELIE Rank | Phenolyzer Score | Phenolyzer Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 99.3 | 1 | 0.780 | 1 |
|
| 94.2 | 2 | 0.001 | 22 |
|
| 87.8 | 3 | 0.029 | 4 |
|
| 74.0 | 4 | 0.025 | 8 |
|
| 48.3 | 5 | 0.026 | 7 |
|
| – | – | 0.041 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 11 | 0.037 | 3 |
|
| – | – | 0.028 | 5 |
Figure 3Sanger sequencing electropherograms of B3GLCT exon 8 (A) and exon 9 (B). Points of mutations are indicated with red arrows (violet bar indicates exonic region, white arrow intronic region).
Figure 4Flow chart describing the steps in the data analysis pipeline.