James M Greenberg1, Brenda B Poindexter1, Pamela A Shaw2, Scarlett L Bellamy2, Roberta L Keller3, Paul E Moore4, Christopher McPherson5, Rita M Ryan6. 1. Departments of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 4. Departments of Pediatrics and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of medications to treat respiratory conditions of extreme prematurity is often based upon studies of adults or children over 2 years of age. Little is known about the spectrum of medications used or dosing ranges. To inform the design of future studies, we conducted a prospective analysis of respiratory medication exposure among 832 extremely low gestational age neonates. METHODS: The prematurity and respiratory outcomes program (PROP) enrolled neonates less than 29-week gestation from 6 centers incorporating 13 clinical sites. We collected recorded daily "respiratory" medications given along with dosing information through 40-week postmenstrual age or neonatal intensive care unit discharge if earlier. RESULTS: PROP participants were exposed to a wide range of respiratory medications, often at doses beyond published recommendations. Nearly 50% received caffeine and furosemide beyond published recommendations for cumulative dose. Those who developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia were more likely to receive treatment with respiratory medications. However, more than 30% of PROP subjects that did not develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia also were treated with diuretics, systemic steroids, and other respiratory medications. CONCLUSION: Extremely preterm neonates in PROP were exposed to high doses of medications at levels known to generate significant adverse effects. With limited evidence for efficacy, there is an urgent need for controlled trials in this vulnerable patient population.
BACKGROUND: The use of medications to treat respiratory conditions of extreme prematurity is often based upon studies of adults or children over 2 years of age. Little is known about the spectrum of medications used or dosing ranges. To inform the design of future studies, we conducted a prospective analysis of respiratory medication exposure among 832 extremely low gestational age neonates. METHODS: The prematurity and respiratory outcomes program (PROP) enrolled neonates less than 29-week gestation from 6 centers incorporating 13 clinical sites. We collected recorded daily "respiratory" medications given along with dosing information through 40-week postmenstrual age or neonatal intensive care unit discharge if earlier. RESULTS: PROP participants were exposed to a wide range of respiratory medications, often at doses beyond published recommendations. Nearly 50% received caffeine and furosemide beyond published recommendations for cumulative dose. Those who developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia were more likely to receive treatment with respiratory medications. However, more than 30% of PROP subjects that did not develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia also were treated with diuretics, systemic steroids, and other respiratory medications. CONCLUSION: Extremely preterm neonates in PROP were exposed to high doses of medications at levels known to generate significant adverse effects. With limited evidence for efficacy, there is an urgent need for controlled trials in this vulnerable patient population.
Authors: Rita M Ryan; Manjeet K Paintlia; Danforth A Newton; Demetri D Spyropoulos; Matthew Kemp; Alan H Jobe; John E Baatz Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Zeyar T Htun; Elizabeth V Schulz; Riddhi K Desai; Jaime L Marasch; Christopher C McPherson; Lucy D Mastrandrea; Alan H Jobe; Rita M Ryan Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Taylor P Hansen; Janelle Noel-MacDonnell; Sara Kuckelman; Michael Norberg; William Truog; Winston Manimtim Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Nicolas A Bamat; Timothy D Nelin; Eric C Eichenwald; Haresh Kirpalani; Matthew M Laughon; Wesley M Jackson; Erik A Jensen; Kathleen A Gibbs; Scott A Lorch Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Thomas M Raffay; Mandy Brasher; Brooke C Place; Abhijit Patwardhan; Peter J Giannone; Henrietta Bada; Philip M Westgate; Elie G Abu Jawdeh Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Joshua C Euteneuer; Ellen Kerns; Chelsey Leiting; Russell J McCulloh; Eric S Peeples Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Morgan D Lane; Sujata Kishnani; Obianuju Udemadu; Samuel Eshun Danquah; Robert M Treadway; Aaliyah Langman; Stephen Balevic; Wesley M Jackson; Matthew Laughon; Christoph P Hornik; Rachel G Greenberg; Reese H Clark; Kanecia O Zimmerman Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 3.225