Literature DB >> 31794080

A conceptual framework of patient-reported outcomes in people with venous leg ulcers.

Rasa Ruseckaite1, Catelyn Richards2, Claudia Rutherford3,4, Victoria Team2, Louise Turnour2, Peter Franks5, Carolina Weller2.   

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common chronic often undertreated condition, which affects individual's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Numerous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been validated to capture HRQoL in patients with VLUs. However, available instruments contain many items, are hard to use in clinical practice, and present with weak responsiveness. This study aims to determine clinical utility of an existing VLU-QoL instrument and to develop a comprehensive PROs assessment framework to guide clinical practice treatment in people with VLUs in Australia. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with VLU patients (N = 13) and their managing clinicians (N = 6) in Victoria, Australia. Interview topics covered content and face validity, appropriateness, and acceptability of the VLU-QoL instrument to determine suitable and appropriate for use in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients agreed that a VLU-QoL instrument was needed in clinical practice. Both clinicians and patients agreed it would be appropriate to answer PROMs questions prior to consultation with clinicians every 3-6 months. However, patients considered that some of the questions are ambiguous and too technical. Patients reported that it would be useful to include additional items relating to daily wound care, compression bandaging, and dressings. Clinicians reported that the VLU-QoL instrument was too long and required restructuring to facilitate utility in practice. A conceptual framework for HRQoL in VLUs included traditional HRQoL components and VLU-specific issues. Overall, the VLU-QoL was well accepted, although changes to make it more concise, comprehensive, and to clearly reflect consumers' perspectives were lacking. The proposed conceptual framework will inform the development of a new PROM for use by clinicians and patients in clinical settings.
© 2019 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31794080     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  2 in total

1.  Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Health literacy in people with venous leg ulcers: a protocol for scoping review.

Authors:  C D Weller; Victoria Team; Sebastian Probst; Georgina Gethin; Catelyn Richards; Jane Sixsmith; Louise Turnour; Ayoub Bouguettaya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.