Sharon Chiang1, Daniel M Goldenholz2, Robert Moss3, Vikram R Rao1, Zulfi Haneef4,5, William H Theodore6, Jonathan K Kleen1, Jay Gavvala4, Marina Vannucci7, John M Stern8. 1. Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Seizure Tracker TM LLC, Annandale, Virginia. 4. Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Neurology Care Line, VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 6. Clinical Epilepsy Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas. 8. Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We conducted clinical testing of an automated Bayesian machine learning algorithm (Epilepsy Seizure Assessment Tool [EpiSAT]) for outpatient seizure risk assessment using seizure counting data, and validated performance against specialized epilepsy clinician experts. METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study of EpiSAT performance against 24 specialized clinician experts at three tertiary referral epilepsy centers in the United States. Accuracy, interrater reliability, and intra-rater reliability of EpiSAT for correctly identifying changes in seizure risk (improvements, worsening, or no change) were evaluated using 120 seizures from four synthetic seizure diaries (seizure risk known) and 120 seizures from four real seizure diaries (seizure risk unknown). The proportion of observed agreement between EpiSAT and clinicians was evaluated to assess compatibility of EpiSAT with clinical decision patterns by epilepsy experts. RESULTS: EpiSAT exhibited substantial observed agreement (75.4%) with clinicians for assessing seizure risk. The mean accuracy of epilepsy providers for correctly assessing seizure risk was 74.7%. EpiSAT accurately identified seizure risk in 87.5% of seizure diary entries, corresponding to a significant improvement of 17.4% (P = .002). Clinicians exhibited low-to-moderate interrater reliability for seizure risk assessment (Krippendorff's α = 0.46) with good intrarater reliability across a 4- to 12-week evaluation period (Scott's π = 0.89). SIGNIFICANCE: These results validate the ability of EpiSAT to yield objective clinical recommendations on seizure risk which follow decision patterns similar to those from specialized epilepsy providers, but with improved accuracy and reproducibility. This algorithm may serve as a useful clinical decision support system for quantitative analysis of clinical seizure frequency in clinical epilepsy practice. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted clinical testing of an automated Bayesian machine learning algorithm (Epilepsy Seizure Assessment Tool [EpiSAT]) for outpatient seizure risk assessment using seizure counting data, and validated performance against specialized epilepsy clinician experts. METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study of EpiSAT performance against 24 specialized clinician experts at three tertiary referral epilepsy centers in the United States. Accuracy, interrater reliability, and intra-rater reliability of EpiSAT for correctly identifying changes in seizure risk (improvements, worsening, or no change) were evaluated using 120 seizures from four synthetic seizure diaries (seizure risk known) and 120 seizures from four real seizure diaries (seizure risk unknown). The proportion of observed agreement between EpiSAT and clinicians was evaluated to assess compatibility of EpiSAT with clinical decision patterns by epilepsy experts. RESULTS: EpiSAT exhibited substantial observed agreement (75.4%) with clinicians for assessing seizure risk. The mean accuracy of epilepsy providers for correctly assessing seizure risk was 74.7%. EpiSAT accurately identified seizure risk in 87.5% of seizure diary entries, corresponding to a significant improvement of 17.4% (P = .002). Clinicians exhibited low-to-moderate interrater reliability for seizure risk assessment (Krippendorff's α = 0.46) with good intrarater reliability across a 4- to 12-week evaluation period (Scott's π = 0.89). SIGNIFICANCE: These results validate the ability of EpiSAT to yield objective clinical recommendations on seizure risk which follow decision patterns similar to those from specialized epilepsy providers, but with improved accuracy and reproducibility. This algorithm may serve as a useful clinical decision support system for quantitative analysis of clinical seizure frequency in clinical epilepsy practice. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Daniel M Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jonathan Scott; Sungyoung Auh; William H Theodore Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Joseph J Tharayil; Sharon Chiang; Robert Moss; John M Stern; William H Theodore; Daniel M Goldenholz Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Arthur C Grant; Samah G Abdel-Baki; Jeremy Weedon; Vanessa Arnedo; Geetha Chari; Ewa Koziorynska; Catherine Lushbough; Douglas Maus; Tresa McSween; Katherine A Mortati; Alexandra Reznikov; Ahmet Omurtag Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Mark Quigg; Felice Sun; Nathan B Fountain; Barbara C Jobst; Victoria S S Wong; Emily Mirro; Sarah Brown; David C Spencer Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Maxime O Baud; Jonathan K Kleen; Emily A Mirro; Jason C Andrechak; David King-Stephens; Edward F Chang; Vikram R Rao Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Daniel M Goldenholz; Shira R Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jacqueline French; Daniel Lowenstein; Ruben Kuzniecky; Sheryl Haut; Sabrina Cristofaro; Kamil Detyniecki; John Hixson; Philippa Karoly; Mark Cook; Alex Strashny; William H Theodore Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Philippa J Karoly; Dean R Freestone; Dominique Eden; Rachel E Stirling; Lyra Li; Pedro F Vianna; Matias I Maturana; Wendyl J D'Souza; Mark J Cook; Mark P Richardson; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Ewan S Nurse Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Sharon Chiang; Ankit N Khambhati; Emily T Wang; Marina Vannucci; Edward F Chang; Vikram R Rao Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Philippa J Karoly; Ewan S Nurse; Sonya B Dumanis; Mona Nasseri; Pedro F Viana; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Greg Worrell; Mark P Richardson; Mark J Cook Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.003