Literature DB >> 31792663

Chemical Deception and Structural Adaptation in Microdon (Diptera, Syrphidae, Microdontinae), a Genus of Hoverflies Parasitic on Social Insects.

G Scarparo1,2, P d'Ettorre3, A Di Giulio4,5.   

Abstract

Various organisms, especially arthropods, are able to live as parasites in ant nests and to prey upon ant broods without eliciting any aggressive behaviour in the hosts. Understanding how these intruders are able to break the ants' communication codes in their favour represents a challenging and intriguing evolutionary question. We studied the chemical strategies of three European hoverfly species, Microdon mutabilis (parasitic on Formica cunicularia), M. analis (parasitic on Lasius emarginatus) and M. devius (parasitic on L. distinguendus). The peculiar slug-like larvae of these three species live inside ant nests feeding upon their broods. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses show that: 1) these parasites mimic the host brood rather than the ant workers, although each differs distinctly in the extent of chemical mimicry; 2) isolation experiments indicate that after 14 days the responsible cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are not passively acquired but synthesized by the fly larvae. Additionally, Microdon larvae show an array of protective structural features, such as a thick and multi-layered cuticle, retractable head, dome-shaped tergum and a flat and strongly adhesive "foot" (sternum). This combination of protective chemical and structural features represents a successful key innovation by Microdon species, and one that may facilitate host switching. The results of a preliminary adoption analysis confirm that Microdon larvae of at least some species can readily be accepted by different species of ants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical mimicry; Host specificity; Parasitism; Protective structure; Social parasites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792663     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-019-01121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  14 in total

1.  Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Host propagation permits extreme local adaptation in a social parasite of ants.

Authors:  K Schönrogge; M G Gardner; G W Elmes; E K V Napper; D J Simcox; J C Wardlaw; J Breen; B Barr; J J Knapp; J A Pickett; J A Thomas
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Arthropods Associate with their Red Wood ant Host without Matching Nestmate Recognition Cues.

Authors:  Thomas Parmentier; Wouter Dekoninck; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linephithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli.

Authors:  Michael J Greene; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants.

Authors:  F Barbero; S Bonelli; J A Thomas; E Balletto; K Schönrogge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Lipid melting and cuticular permeability: new insights into an old problem.

Authors:  Allen G. Gibbs
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  The Pied Piper: A Parasitic Beetle's Melodies Modulate Ant Behaviours.

Authors:  Andrea Di Giulio; Emanuela Maurizi; Francesca Barbero; Marco Sala; Simone Fattorini; Emilio Balletto; Simona Bonelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variation in butterfly larval acoustics as a strategy to infiltrate and exploit host ant colony resources.

Authors:  Marco Sala; Luca Pietro Casacci; Emilio Balletto; Simona Bonelli; Francesca Barbero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chemical disguise of myrmecophilous cockroaches and its implications for understanding nestmate recognition mechanisms in leaf-cutting ants.

Authors:  Volker Nehring; Francesca R Dani; Luca Calamai; Stefano Turillazzi; Horst Bohn; Klaus-Dieter Klass; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Chemical and behavioral integration of army ant-associated rove beetles - a comparison between specialists and generalists.

Authors:  Christoph von Beeren; Adrian Brückner; Munetoshi Maruyama; Griffin Burke; Jana Wieschollek; Daniel J C Kronauer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.