Literature DB >> 3179252

Photostress recovery in chronic open angle glaucoma.

M D Sherman1, P Henkind.   

Abstract

Photostress recovery time was measured in 30 eyes from 15 patients with chronic open angle glaucoma, and 30 eyes from 15 individuals of a similar age group with no ophthalmological disorder. The average recovery time in patients with glaucoma was 70.47 (SD 35.39) seconds. The average recovery time in the control population was 41.97 (SD 17.34) seconds. This difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.001). There was a small positive correlation between age and recovery time in the control population, whereas there was no correlation between age and recovery time in the glaucoma group. There was no correlation between visual acuity and recovery time for either group. There was also no correlation between intraocular pressure and recovery time for the glaucoma group. It was not possible to control for pupillary dilatation in this study. However, it has been previously demonstrated that pharmacological meiosis will not delay photostress recovery time in normal subjects. This is the first report of photostress recovery testing in patients with chronic open angle glaucoma. The results are discussed in terms of the pathophysiology of glaucoma and previous photostress studies in patients with macular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3179252      PMCID: PMC1041550          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.72.9.641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  THE DAZZLING TEST IN DISEASES OF THE RETINA.

Authors:  H FORSIUS; A W ERIKSSON; U KRAUSE
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1964

2.  A new approach to the study of flash blindness. Use of the Zeiss light coagulator.

Authors:  S L SEVERIN; N L NEWTON; J F CULVER
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-05

3.  Test for central serous retinopathy based on clinical observations and trial.

Authors:  H MAGDER
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Ocular toxicity of antimalarial drugs. Long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R E Carr; P Henkind; N Rothfield; I M Siegel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Prognosis of patients with bilateral macular drusen.

Authors:  W E Smiddy; S L Fine
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The scotometer. A device for measuring macular recovery time.

Authors:  P Henkind; I M Siegel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Macular function and the photostress test 1.

Authors:  S L Severin; R L Tour; R H Kershaw
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-01

8.  The photostress recovery test in the clinical assessment of visual function.

Authors:  J S Glaser; P J Savino; K D Sumers; S A McDonald; R W Knighton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.258

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiological evaluation of the macular cone adaptation: VEP after photostress. A review.

Authors:  V Parisi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Extrafoveal photostress recovery test in glaucoma and idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  M Horiguchi; Y Ito; Y Miyake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  [Flicker provocation with LED full-field stimulation in normals and glaucoma patients].

Authors:  F K Horn; B Link; K Dehne; R Lämmer; A G Jünemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Readaptation time after photo-stress in normal subjects and glaucoma patients].

Authors:  B Kamppeter; R F Degenring; J B Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.