Literature DB >> 3179238

Influence of design characteristics on the outcome of retrospective cohort studies.

G M Swaen1, J M Meijers.   

Abstract

Retrospective cohort studies are increasingly being applied in occupational health. To describe and investigate further this type of study 179 retrospective cohort studies published in six scientific journals between 1975 and 1985 inclusive were reviewed. A description of the 179 reviewed articles was made and relations between investigator orientated variables, design characteristics, and the outcome of the study were investigated. Retrospective cohort studies focusing on exposures in the chemical industry appeared to yield most negative findings, which is partly explained by the relation between the affiliation of the investigator and the outcome of the study. Studies requiring a minimal latency period, an occupational reference group, and a low percentage of lost to follow up tended to have a higher chance of a positive finding. Study size, however, did not appear to be related to the outcome.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3179238      PMCID: PMC1009666          DOI: 10.1136/oem.45.9.624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ind Med        ISSN: 0007-1072


  10 in total

1.  Standardized mortality ratios and the "healthy worker effect": Scratching beneath the surface.

Authors:  A J McMichael
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

2.  A critique of the standardized mortality ratio.

Authors:  W R Gaffey
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

3.  Predicted mortality patterns in cohort study populations exposed to different types of hazard: can SMRs show a dose-response?

Authors:  C M Bell; D A Coleman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1983 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Pitfalls in epidemiological research. An examination of the asbestos literature.

Authors:  P E Enterline
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

5.  Occupational cancer: problems in interpreting human evidence.

Authors:  R Doll
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1984

6.  Methodological issues involving the standardized mortality ratio and proportionate mortality ratio in occupational studies.

Authors:  O Wong; P Decoufle
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1982-04

7.  "Negative" results in cohort studies--how to recognize fallacies.

Authors:  S Hernberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  The "healthy worker effect"--fact or artifact?

Authors:  S Shindell; R F Weisberg; E E Giefer
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1978-12

9.  Occupational mortality studies. Principles of validity.

Authors:  J D Wang; O S Miettinen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry.

Authors:  A J Fox; P F Collier
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1976-12
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for Alzheimer's Disease: an analysis controlling for tobacco industry affiliation.

Authors:  Janine K Cataldo; Judith J Prochaska; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Influence of design characteristics on the outcome of retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  M J Teta
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-08

3.  Outcome of retrospective cohort studies and study size: a publication bias?

Authors:  R McNamee
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-02

4.  Influence of design characteristics on the outcome of retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  G V Cox
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-06

5.  Good laboratory practices and safety assessments: another view.

Authors:  Tony Tweedale
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in regulatory toxicology and pharmacology.

Authors:  Clayton Velicer; Gideon St Helen; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Enhancing credibility of chemical safety studies: no consensus.

Authors:  Tony Tweedale
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Quantifying and Adjusting for Disease Misclassification Due to Loss to Follow-Up in Historical Cohort Mortality Studies.

Authors:  Laura L F Scott; George Maldonado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.