Bastian Scheiderer1, Cameron Kia2, Elifho Obopilwe2, Jeremiah D Johnson2, Mark P Cote2, Florian B Imhoff3, Felix Dyrna4, Knut Beitzel4, Andreas B Imhoff4, Christopher R Adams5, Augustus D Mazzocca2, Daichi Morikawa6. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: bastian.scheiderer@tum.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naples Community Hospital, Naples, Florida, U.S.A. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the effect of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using a 3- and 6-mm thick acellular dermal allograft for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a dynamic shoulder model. Maximum abduction angle (MAA), glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), subacromial peak contact pressure (sPCP), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact shoulder, (2) simulated irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT), (3) SCR using a 3-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft, (4) SCR using a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft. RESULTS: Compared with the intact state, simulated irreparable RCTs significantly decreased MAA (P < .001), while significantly increasing ghST (P = .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P < .001). SCR with a 3-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P = .01) and decreased ghST (P = .01) compared with the RCT state, however, showed similar sPCP and cDF. Compared with the torn state, SCR with a 6-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P < .001) and significantly decreased ghST (P < .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .001). Using a 6-mm-thick graft demonstrated similar MAA, ghST, sPCP, and cDF compared with the intact state. When comparing the 3-mm to the 6-mm thick graft, significant differences were found in ghST (P = .03), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: SCR with a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft better restored normal glenohumeral joint position and forces compared with a 3-mm-thick graft for the treatment of irreparable RCTs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Graft thickness may affect the clinical success following SCR with commercially available dermal allografts. Using a thicker (>3 mm) graft was able to biomechanically better restore native glenohumeral joint properties.
PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the effect of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using a 3- and 6-mm thick acellular dermal allograft for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a dynamic shoulder model. Maximum abduction angle (MAA), glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), subacromial peak contact pressure (sPCP), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact shoulder, (2) simulated irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT), (3) SCR using a 3-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft, (4) SCR using a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft. RESULTS: Compared with the intact state, simulated irreparable RCTs significantly decreased MAA (P < .001), while significantly increasing ghST (P = .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P < .001). SCR with a 3-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P = .01) and decreased ghST (P = .01) compared with the RCT state, however, showed similar sPCP and cDF. Compared with the torn state, SCR with a 6-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P < .001) and significantly decreased ghST (P < .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .001). Using a 6-mm-thick graft demonstrated similar MAA, ghST, sPCP, and cDF compared with the intact state. When comparing the 3-mm to the 6-mm thick graft, significant differences were found in ghST (P = .03), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: SCR with a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft better restored normal glenohumeral joint position and forces compared with a 3-mm-thick graft for the treatment of irreparable RCTs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Graft thickness may affect the clinical success following SCR with commercially available dermal allografts. Using a thicker (>3 mm) graft was able to biomechanically better restore native glenohumeral joint properties.
Authors: Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Cameron Kia; Elifho Obopilwe; Leo Pauzenberger; Christopher R Adams; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Augustus D Mazzocca Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-10-06