| Literature DB >> 31791276 |
David Patrick Kateete1,2, Benon B Asiimwe3, Raymond Mayanja4,3,5, Brian Mujuni4,3, Freddie Bwanga4,3, Christine F Najjuka3, Karin Källander6,7, Elizeus Rutebemberwa8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus carriage is a known risk factor for staphylococcal disease. However, the carriage rates vary by country, demographic group and profession. This study aimed to determine the S. aureus carriage rate in children in Eastern Uganda, and identify S. aureus lineages that cause infection in Uganda.Entities:
Keywords: Carriage; Genotyping; Iganga/Mayuge districts; MSSA/MRSA; Multidrug resistant; Staphylococcus aureus; Urban/rural
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31791276 PMCID: PMC6889221 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4652-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Study flow chart illustrating the procedure for the isolation and identification of S. aureus
Frequency of spa types among S. aureus isolates from children in IMHDSS, Eastern Uganda
| MDR (%) | MSSA | MRSA | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Frequency | RF | Frequency | RF | Frequency | RF | ||
| t064 | 10 (66.7) | 05 (33.3) | 06 | 6.1 | 9 | 20 | 15 | 10.4 | = 0.0118 |
| t645 | 06 (55.4) | 05 (45.5) | 11 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 7.6 | = 0.0205 |
| t4353 | 06 (60) | 04 (40) | 9 | 9.1 | 1 | 2.2 | 10 | 7 | = 0.1324 |
| t002 | 06 (85.7) | 01 (14.3) | 6 | 6.1 | 1 | 2.2 | 7 | 5 | = 0.3158 |
| t037 | 06 (85.7) | 01 (14.3) | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15.6 | 7 | 5 | = 0.0001 |
| t078 | – | – | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.4 | |
| t355 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.2 | 2 | 1.4 | |
| t3092 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.2 | 2 | 1.4 | |
| t12939 | – | – | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.2 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t3662 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t318 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t1456 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t10394 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t1476 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t2168 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| t213 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| Unknown | – | – | 4 | – | 0 | 0 | 4 | – | |
| NT | – | – | 17 | – | 4 | – | 21 | – | |
| ND | – | – | 35 | – | 20 | – | 55 | – | |
| Total | – | – | 99 | – | 45 | – | 144 | – | |
The predominant spa types are depicted in bold font. RF denotes Relative Frequency (%) i.e., the number of times that the event (i.e. spa lineage) occurred, divided by the total in that category
NT not type-able, ND not determined
Antibiotypes among MSSA and MRSA and their relationship with spa types
| Antibiotype | Resistance profile | No. isolates showing this pattern (%) | Major | SCC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSSA | S1 | PEN-TET | 17 (17.2) | t064 (4), t4353 (3), t645 (2), t355 (1) | Not applicable |
| S2 | PEN-TET-ERY | 11 (11.1) | t002 (3), t645 (1), t078 (1), t4353 (1), t2168 (1) | ||
| S3 | PEN-TET-GEN | 9 (9.1) | t318 (1), t213 (1), t1476 (1) | ||
| S4 | PEN | 6 (6.1) | t002 (1), t645 (1), t4353 (1) | ||
| S5 | TET | 6 (6.1) | t4353 (1) | ||
| S6 | PEN-TET-CHL-GEN | 4 (4.4) | t645 (1) | ||
| S7 | PEN-TET-SXT | 4 (4.4) | t002 (1), t1456 (1) | ||
| S8 | PEN-TET-SXT-CHL | 3 (3) | – | ||
| S9 | PEN-SXT-ERY-CLI-MUP | 3 (3) | – | ||
| S10 | PEN-TET-CHL | 2 (2) | t645 (1), t4353 (1) | ||
| S11 | TET-SXT-CHL | 2 (2) | t3662 (1), t10394 (1) | ||
| S12 | PEN-TET-ERY-CHL | 2 (2) | t064 (1), t3092 (1) | ||
| S13 | PEN-SXT | 2 (2) | t4353 (1) | ||
| S14 | PEN-TET-SXT-ERY | 2 (2) | t645 (1) | ||
| S38 | - (Pan-susceptible) | 3 (3) | t064 (1) | ||
| MRSA | R1 | PEN-FOX-TET-SXT-ERY-CHL-GEN | 7 (15.6) | - (4), t064 (3) | I (4), IV (3) |
| R2 | PEN-FOX-TET-SXT-ERY-CHL-GEN-CIP | 4 (9) | – | I (3), IV (1) | |
| R3 | PEN-FOX-TET-SXT-ERY-CHL-GEN | 4 (9) | – | I (3), IV (1) | |
| R4 | PEN-PEN-TET-SXT-ERY | 3 (6.7) | t002 (1), t064 (1) | I (1), II (1), IV (1) | |
| R5 | PEN-FOX-TET-SXT-ERY-CIP | 3 (6.7) | t064 (1) | IV (3) | |
| R6 | PEN-FOX-TET-SXT-ERY-GEN | 2 (4.4) | t064 (1) | I (1), IV (1) |
Shown are antibiotypes depicted by two or more isolates. Antibiotypes depicted by only one isolate are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1
FOX cefoxitin, PEN penicillin, TET tetracycline, SXT trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or co-trimoxazole, ERY erythromycin, CHL chloramphenicol, GEN gentamicin, CIP ciprofloxacin, CLI clindamycin, RIF rifampicin, MUP Mupirocin High level, VAN vancomycin, LZD linezolid, MSSA Methicillin susceptible S. aureus, MRSA Methicillin resistant S. aureus
Fig. 2The most common S. aureus spa types identified in Uganda. Asterisks indicate frequencies for common spa types in Uganda and their association with either MRSA (t037, t064) or MSSA (t645, t4353)