| Literature DB >> 31791272 |
Erina Goda1, Kazuyuki Hirooka2,3, Kazuhiko Mori4, Yoshiaki Kiuchi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To examine the use of ripasudil as a trabeculotomy outcome marker in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Entities:
Keywords: Glaucoma; Ripasudil; Trabeculotomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31791272 PMCID: PMC6889586 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1253-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Clinical characteristics
| Effective group ( | Non-effective group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.4 ± 19.4 | 61.2 ± 13.2 | 0.76 |
| Gender (M/F) | 6/8 | 9/12 | 1.00 |
| IOP before administration of ripasudil (mmHg) | 22.8 ± 3.7 | 21.4 ± 4.4 | 0.33 |
| IOP after administration of ripasudil (mmHg) | 19.0 ± 3.5 | 23.4 ± 8.0 | 0.10 |
| Refractive error (D) | −4.6 ± 4.7 | − 4.7 ± 4.9 | 0.92 |
| Axial length (mm) | 24.6 ± 1.7 | 25.5 ± 3.2 | 0.44 |
| Central corneal thickness (m) | 522.7 ± 31.9 | 530.1 ± 48.6 | 0.61 |
| Preoperative IOP (mmHg) | 27.4 ± 6.2 | 24.8 ± 3.9 | 0.14 |
| Lens status | 1.00 | ||
| Phakia | 12 | 18 | |
| Pseudophakia | 2 | 3 | |
| HFA30–2 MD (dB) | −7.4 ± 4.1 | −12.2 ± 6.4 | 0.03 |
| Glaucoma medications | 3.2 ± 2.0 | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 0.73 |
| PGA + β blocker + CAI | 3 | 6 | |
| PGA + β blocker + CAI + brimonidine | 2 | 7 | |
| PGA + CAI + brimonidine | 0 | 0 | |
| PGA + CAI | 0 | 1 | |
| β blocker + CAI + brimonidine | 0 | 0 | |
| Others | 9 | 7 | |
M; male, F; female, IOP; intraocular pressure, D; diopter, HFA; Humphrey field analyzer, MD; mean deviation
PGA; prostaglandin analogue, CAI; carbonic anhydrate inhibitor
Fig. 1Mean intraocular pressure following trabeculotomy in the effective and non-effective groups. Intraocular pressure was significantly reduced in both groups compared with baseline. *: P < 0.05 compared with baseline. ●: effective group, ▲: non-effective group
Fig. 2Mean antiglaucoma medications following trabeculotomy in the effective and non-effective groups. Antiglaucoma medications were significantly reduced in both groups compared with baseline. *: P < 0.05 compared with baseline. ●: effective group, ▲: non-effective group
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier survival curve of surgical outcomes in ripasudil effective vs. ripasudil non-effective eyes in criteria A (a) and B (b). No significant differences were noted for the cumulative probability of success between effective and non-effective groups (A: P = 0.14, B: P = 0.91)
Postoperative clinical data
| Effective group ( | Non-effective group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Final MD of HFA30–2 (dB) | −8.1 ± 4.8 | −11.8 ± 5.4 | 0.09 |
| Glaucoma medications | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0.04 |
| PGA + β blocker + CAI | 1 | 6 | |
| PGA + β blocker + CAI + brimonidine | 1 | 1 | |
| PGA + β blocker | 2 | 0 | |
| PGA + CAI | 1 | 0 | |
| PGA | 1 | 2 | |
| β blocker + CAI | 0 | 5 | |
| CAI | 0 | 1 |
HFA; Humphrey field analyzer, MD; mean deviation, PGA; prostaglandin analogue,
CAI; carbonic anhydrate inhibitor
Postoperative complications
| Effective group (n = 14) | Non-effective group (n = 21) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyphema with niveau formation | 2 (14.3%) | 7 (33.3%) | 0.21 |
| Transient IOP elevation > 30 mmHg | 4 (28.6%) | 6 (28.6%) | 0.48 |
IOP; intraocular pressure
Cox regression analysis of various factors as a risk for surgical failure
| Factors | Risk Ratio | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (per year) | 1.01 | 0.972–1.042 | 0.73 |
| Preoperative IOP (per mmHg) | 1.03 | 0.951–1.109 | 0.50 |
| Previous cataract surgery | 2.90 | 0.587–14.298 | 0.19 |
| Combined cataract surgery | 2.09 | 0.648–6.763 | 0.22 |
| Effectiveness of ripasudil | 0.72 | 0.332–1.578 | 0.42 |
CI; confidence interval, IOP; intraocular pressure