Literature DB >> 31791166

The µMCTQ: An Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire.

Neda Ghotbi1,2, Luísa K Pilz1,3,4, Eva C Winnebeck1, Céline Vetter5, Giulia Zerbini1, David Lenssen1, Giovanni Frighetto6, Marco Salamanca6, Rodolfo Costa7, Sara Montagnese6, Till Roenneberg1.   

Abstract

Individuals vary in how their circadian system synchronizes with the cyclic environment (zeitgeber). Assessing these differences in "phase of entrainment"-often referred to as chronotype-is an important procedure in laboratory experiments and epidemiological studies but is also increasingly applied in circadian medicine, both in diagnosis and therapy. While biochemical measurements (e.g., dim-light melatonin onset [DLMO]) of internal time are still the gold standard, they are laborious, expensive, and mostly rely on special conditions (e.g., dim light). Chronotype estimation in the form of questionnaires is useful in approximating the timing of an individual's circadian clock. They are simple, inexpensive, and location independent (e.g., administrable on- and offline) and can therefore be easily administered to many individuals. The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) is an established instrument to assess chronotype by asking subjects about their sleep-wake-behavior. Here we present a shortened version of the MCTQ, the µMCTQ, for use in situations in which instrument length is critical, such as in large cohort studies. The µMCTQ contains only the core chronotype module of the standard MCTQ (stdMCTQ), which was shortened and adapted from 17 to 6 essential questions, allowing for a quick assessment of chronotype and other related parameters such as social jetlag and sleep duration. µMCTQ results correspond well to the ones collected by the stdMCTQ and are externally validated by actimetry and DLMO, assessed at home (no measure of compliance). Sleep onset, midpoint of sleep, and the µMCTQ-derived marker of chronotype showed slight deviations toward earlier times in the µMCTQ when compared with the stdMCTQ (<35 min). The µMCTQ assessment of chronotype showed good test-retest reliability and correlated significantly with phase markers from actimetry and melatonin (DLMO), especially with measurements taken on work-free days. Because of its brevity, the µMCTQ represents an ideal tool to estimate individual internal time in time-critical contexts, from large cohort studies to individualized medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DLMO; actigraphy; chronotype; circadian; phase of entrainment; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31791166     DOI: 10.1177/0748730419886986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  18 in total

1.  Self-reported sleep duration and timing: A methodological review of event definitions, context, and timeframe of related questions.

Authors:  Rebecca Robbins; Stuart F Quan; Laura K Barger; Charles A Czeisler; Maya Fray-Witzer; Matthew D Weaver; Ying Zhang; Susan Redline; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  Sleep Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-25

2.  The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19.

Authors:  Maximilien Chaumon; Pier-Alexandre Rioux; Sophie K Herbst; Ignacio Spiousas; Sebastian L Kübel; Elisa M Gallego Hiroyasu; Şerife Leman Runyun; Luigi Micillo; Vassilis Thanopoulos; Esteban Mendoza-Duran; Anna Wagelmans; Ramya Mudumba; Ourania Tachmatzidou; Nicola Cellini; Arnaud D'Argembeau; Anne Giersch; Simon Grondin; Claude Gronfier; Federico Alvarez Igarzábal; André Klarsfeld; Ljubica Jovanovic; Rodrigo Laje; Elisa Lannelongue; Giovanna Mioni; Cyril Nicolaï; Narayanan Srinivasan; Shogo Sugiyama; Marc Wittmann; Yuko Yotsumoto; Argiro Vatakis; Fuat Balcı; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-08-15

3.  Driving simulator performance worsens after the Spring transition to Daylight Saving Time.

Authors:  Federico Orsini; Lisa Zarantonello; Rodolfo Costa; Riccardo Rossi; Sara Montagnese
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Validation of the Portuguese Variant of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQPT).

Authors:  Cátia Reis; Sara Gamboa Madeira; Luísa V Lopes; Teresa Paiva; Till Roenneberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effects of societal-level COVID-19 mitigation measures on the timing and quality of sleep in Ireland.

Authors:  Sudha Raman; Andrew N Coogan
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.842

6.  Sleep, Circadian Rhythmicity and Response to Chronotherapy in University Students: Tips from Chronobiology Practicals.

Authors:  Sara Montagnese; Lisa Zarantonello; Chiara Formentin; Christian Zancato; Maria Beatrice Bonetto; Alberto Biscontin; Paola Cusumano; Rodolfo Costa
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  COVID-19-mandated social restrictions unveil the impact of social time pressure on sleep and body clock.

Authors:  Maria Korman; Vadim Tkachev; Cátia Reis; Yoko Komada; Shingo Kitamura; Denis Gubin; Vinod Kumar; Till Roenneberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Behavior: How a Global Social Lockdown Unlocks Time for Sleep.

Authors:  Thomas Kantermann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Sex differences in the association between chronotype and risk of depression.

Authors:  Kyung Min Kim; Seung Min Han; Kyoung Heo; Won-Joo Kim; Min Kyung Chu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on human sleep and rest-activity rhythms.

Authors:  Christine Blume; Marlene H Schmidt; Christian Cajochen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 10.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.