Literature DB >> 31791160

Clinical utility of pre-endoscopy risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Jennifer Tham1, Adrian Stanley1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a common medical emergency, with an incidence of 103-172 per 100,000 in the United Kingdom (UK) and mortality of 2% to 10%. Early and accurate prediction of the severity of an AUGIB episode may help guide management, including in or outpatient management, level of care required, and timing of endoscopy. This article aims to address the clinical utility of the various pre-endoscopic risk assessment tools used in AUGIB.Areas covered: The authors undertook a literature review of the current evidence on the pre-endoscopic risk assessment scores. Additional the authors discuss the recently published novel risk assessment scores.Expert opinion: The evidence shows that GBS is the most clinically useful risk assessment score in correctly identifying very low-risk patients suitable for outpatient management. At present, research is ongoing to assess machine learning in the assessment of patients presenting with AUGIB. More research is needed but it shows promise for the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AIMS65; Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Glasgow Blatchford score; acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage; pre-endoscopic Rockall score; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31791160     DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1698292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1747-4124            Impact factor:   3.869


  7 in total

1.  Hypocalcemia is associated with adverse clinical course in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alexander Korytny; Amir Klein; Erez Marcusohn; Yaacov Freund; Ami Neuberger; Aeyal Raz; Asaf Miller; Danny Epstein
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Susana Maia; Daniela Falcão; Joana Silva; Isabel Pedroto
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Validation of the new ABC score for predicting 30-day mortality in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Marie Christelle Saade; Anthony Kerbage; Suha Jabak; Maha Makki; Kassem Barada; Yasser Shaib
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Comparison of risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients after renal transplantation: a retrospective observational study in Hunan, China.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Qiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.847

5.  A Comparative Analysis of Risk Scoring Systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Abhijnya K Renukaprasad; Srikanth Narayanaswamy; Vinay R
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-08

6.  Biocompatible and antibacterial soy protein isolate/quaternized chitosan composite sponges for acute upper gastrointestinal hemostasis.

Authors:  Zijian Wang; MeiFang Ke; Liu He; Qi Dong; Xiao Liang; Jun Rao; Junjie Ai; Chuan Tian; Xinwei Han; Yanan Zhao
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  Prediction model of emergency mortality risk in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lan Chen; Han Zheng; Saibin Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.