Literature DB >> 31789804

Comparing the Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm and the Head Impulse Paradigm in Vestibular Neuritis.

Jin Su Park1, Jung Yup Lee, Woojoo Nam, Seungho Noh, Sun O Chang, Min-Beom Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) and head impulse paradigm (HIMP) in acute vestibular neuritis (AVN). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary otology clinic. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: We tested 21 patients with AVN with the HIMP, SHIMP, and caloric tests, and we analyzed the relationships between the tests' results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For this study, we adopted vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains in the SHIMP and HIMP, peak saccade velocity (PSV) of SHIMP which is another indicator of residual vestibular function, and canal paresis of caloric test.
RESULTS: VOR gains showed significant correlation (R = 0.926, p < 0.001) between the SHIMP and HIMP, but VOR gains were slightly lower in the SHIMP than in the HIMP (mean difference 0.07 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). The difference between the HIMP and SHIMP gains was slightly larger on the affected side (0.10 ± 0.09) than on the healthy side (0.03 ± 0.09). The PSV of SHIMP had significant correlation with HIMP gain and canal paresis. Sixteen of 21 patients showed 100% ipsilesional caloric canal paresis, and eight (50%) of them showed no anti-compensatory saccade (direction toward head rotation) in the SHIMP. However, they showed not extremely low VOR gain but variable VOR gain.
CONCLUSION: The new parameters of SHIMP might be used as complement for evaluating vestibular function in AVN. However, the clinical impact of the saccades of SHIMP in AVN has not been revealed clearly yet. This question should be investigated in further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31789804     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical value of the video head impulse test in patients with vestibular neuritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Manzari; Alessandro Antonio Princi; Sara De Angelis; Marco Tramontano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) characteristics in people with Parkinson's disease compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Kim E Hawkins; Jorge Rey-Martinez; Elodie Chiarovano; Serene S Paul; Ariadna Valldeperes; Hamish G MacDougall; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The feasibility of SHIMP for judging subjective vertigo and recovery in patients with vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Hui Leng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Suppression Head Impulse Test (SHIMP) versus Head Impulse Test (HIMP) When Diagnosing Bilateral Vestibulopathy.

Authors:  Tessa van Dooren; Dmitrii Starkov; Florence Lucieer; Bieke Dobbels; Miranda Janssen; Nils Guinand; Angelica Pérez Fornos; Herman Kingma; Vincent Van Rompaey; Raymond van de Berg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Identifying the Clinical Signs on the Healthy Side Using Video Head Impulse Test During Different Stages of Vestibular Neuritis.

Authors:  Leonardo Manzari; Marco Tramontano
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 6.  The Clinical Use of the Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm in Patients with Vestibulopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leonardo Manzari; Sara De Angelis; Alessandro Antonio Princi; Giovanni Galeoto; Marco Tramontano
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 7.  Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update.

Authors:  Dmitrii Starkov; Michael Strupp; Maksim Pleshkov; Herman Kingma; Raymond van de Berg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.849

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.