| Literature DB >> 31788668 |
Tasneem Z Khatib1,2, Paul A R Meyer2, Jed Lusthaus2,3,4, Ilya Manyakin5, Yusuf Mushtaq6, Keith R Martin1,2,7,8.
Abstract
Purpose: Noninvasive, detailed measurement of the dynamics of human aqueous outflow is difficult to achieve with currently available clinical tools. We used hemoglobin video imaging (HVI) to develop a technique to image and quantify human aqueous outflow noninvasively and in real time. Design: A prospective observational study to describe characteristics of aqueous veins and a pilot prospective interventional feasibility study to develop quantification parameters. Participants: Patients were recruited from the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Glaucoma clinic. The observational study included 30 eyes, and the pilot interventional feasibility study was performed on 8 eyes undergoing selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). Our SLT protocol also included the installation of pilocarpine and apraclonidine eye drops.Entities:
Keywords: CSA, cross-sectional area; HVI, hemoglobin video imaging; IOP, intraocular pressure; MD, mean deviation; MIGS, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery; SLT, selective laser trabeculoplasty
Year: 2019 PMID: 31788668 PMCID: PMC6876656 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.04.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma ISSN: 2589-4196
Figure 1Aqueous vein (arrow) captured using conventional techniques (A and B) and hemoglobin video imaging (HVI) (C).
Figure 2Examples of aqueous veins obtained using hemoglobin video imaging (HVI) (white arrows). Aqueous is seen as a centralized erythrocyte void.
Figure 3Displacement of aqueous after digital pressure on the inferior globe. A, Aqueous vein (black arrow) before digital manipulation. B and C, Aqueous is redirected into an episcleral blood filled vessel after digital pressure on the globe (white arrow). D, Immediate resumption of usual aqueous and blood flow after release of pressure.
Figure 4Compression of an aqueous vein (white arrow) using a 10/0 Vicryl loop redirects aqueous to a nearby episcleral blood vessel (black arrow).
Figure 5A, Schematic representation of the intensity profiles of transmitted light in an aqueous vein using hemoglobin video imaging (HVI). B and C, Aqueous vein transept with corresponding density profile and δ measurement. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. D, Bland–Altman plot of the difference in paired δ measurements using HVI against the mean δ measurement.
Figure 6Aqueous column as a tool for quantifying aqueous outflow. A, Fold change in aqueous column cross-sectional area (CSA) after intervention (n = 13; P < 0.05; Student ratio paired t test). B, Correlation between IOP reduction and aqueous column CSA after intervention (n = 13; Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.7; P = 0.007). C, Correlation between change in mean deviation (MD) and aqueous column CSA after intervention (n = 8; Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.75; P = 0.03). AQC = aqueous column; IOP = intraocular pressure; SLT = selective laser trabeculoplasty; VF = visual field.
Figure 7Flow rate using autocorrelation analysis before and after selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). A, Faster rate of decay is seen postintervention indicating an increase in flow rate. B, Similar autocorrelation decay rates seen in nonaqueous vein or background areas of the hemoglobin video imaging (HVI) images.