| Literature DB >> 31788370 |
Sanam Khowaja1, Musa Karim2, Maham Zahid3, Annam Zahid3, Salik Ahmed1, Khawar Kazmi4, Syed Z Jamal5.
Abstract
Introduction Environmental triggers of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have gained mounting evidence from various geographies of the world. However, due to geographic variations in seasonal temperature and other metrological parameters, it is difficult to generalize the findings in one population to another population with different climatic conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the relationship between meteorological parameters and the number of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures for AMI at a tertiary care cardiac hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Methods For this cross-sectional study, data was obtained on the number of primary PCI procedures conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) Karachi, Pakistan during 1st June 2016 to 31st May 2018. Daily meteorological data of the Karachi region for the same period was obtained from the Pakistan Meteorological Department. It consists of temperature, atmospheric pressure, and relative humidity. Based on the weather conditions of Karachi, the data was divided into two seasons; summer (April to October) and winter (November to March). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed taken the number of primary PCI performed as regressand and time trend, average temperature, temperature variation, and relative humidity as regressors. Results A total of 115,494 hospital admissions were recorded during the study period out of which rate of primary PCI was 10.5% (12,107). A negative relationship between average temperature and number of primary PCI was observed with standardized regression coefficients of -0.13 (p < 0.001) on the overall regression model. A similar significant negative relationship of average temperature was observed on the regression model for the cold season with standardized regression coefficients of -0.17 (p < 0.001). While no such relationship was observed for the warm season. Conclusion The average daily temperature was found to be negatively related to the number of primary PCI. Subgroup analysis revealed that the average daily temperature had a significant negative relationship with the number of primary PCI in the cold season; however, no such impact was observed in the warm season.Entities:
Keywords: myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; seasonal; temperature
Year: 2019 PMID: 31788370 PMCID: PMC6855997 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Temporal trend of the number of primary PCI procedures and average temperature
pPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, AvgTemp, average temperature
Figure 2Scatter plot showing a linear relationship between regressand and regressors
r = correlation
The average number of primary PCI procedures performed on the same day and following day of days with extreme temperatures
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SD, standard deviation
| Same day | Following day | |||||
| Base | Mean ± SD | p-value | Count | Mean ± SD | p-value | |
| Cold Season | ||||||
| Coldest | 16 | 17.06 ± 6.20 | 0.41 | 16 | 18.69 ± 6.24 | 0.717 |
| Normal | 286 | 18.26 ± 5.62 | 286 | 18.15 ± 5.71 | ||
| Warm Season | ||||||
| Hottest | 34 | 16.32 ± 6.94 | 0.382 | 34 | 16.00 ± 5.18 | 0.573 |
| Normal | 394 | 15.37 ± 6.01 | 394 | 15.39 ± 6.10 | ||
Figure 3The relationship between heat index and number of primary PCI in the warm and cold seasons
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
Six assumptions for the linear regression models based on overall data and data for warm and cold seasons
KS, Kolmogorov-Smirnov; P-P, normal probability
| Assumption | Criteria for the assumption to met | Regression Models | ||
| Overall | Warm | Cold | ||
| 1 - Linearity of relationship | Visual evidence of linear relationship on scatter plot | Met | Met | Met |
| 2 - No multicollinearity among regressors | Variance inflation factor less than 10 and tolerance score more than 0.2 | Met | Met | Met |
| 3 - No autocorrelation in residuals | Durbin-Watson test statistics within 1.5 to 2.5 range | Met | Met | Met |
| 4 - Homoscedasticity of residuals | No apparent patterns on scatter plot of standardized residuals and predicted values | Met | Met | Met |
| 5 - Normally distributed residuals | Majority of the points on P-P plot along the diagonal line or KS test p-value above 0.05 | Not Met | Met | Met |
| 6 - No extreme values / cases | No cases with Cook’s distance above 1 value | Met | Met | Met |
Multiple linear regression model coefficients for the overall, warm season, and cold season models
Regressand = number of primary PCI performed
*Statistically significant at 5% level of significance
β = unstandardized regression coefficients, Std. β = Standardized regression coefficients, p = p-value, R2 = coefficient of determination, Adj. R2 = adjusted coefficient of determination
| Regressors | Total Model | Warm Model | Cold Model | ||||||
| β | Std. β | p | β | Std. β | p | β | Std. β | p | |
| Constant | 11.92 | - | <0.001* | 10.69 | - | 0.01* | 14.59 | - | <0.001* |
| Time trend | 0.02 | 0.60 | <0.001* | 0.03 | 0.67 | <0.001* | 0.03 | 0.47 | <0.001* |
| Average temperature | -0.17 | -0.13 | <0.001* | -0.12 | -0.03 | 0.36 | -0.29 | -0.17 | <0.001* |
| Temperature variation | 0.17 | 0.12 | <0.001* | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.16 | <0.001* |
| Relative humidity | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.04* | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.65 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| R2 [Adj. R2] | 0.414 [0.411] | 0.460 [0.455] | 0.237 [0.227] | ||||||