| Literature DB >> 31788145 |
Yoshio Hisata1,2, Yuta Sakanishi3, Kazuya Kurogi2, Akihiko Ogushi1, Norio Fukumori4, Takashi Sugioka1.
Abstract
Objective: Previous studies have investigated medical students' interest in family medicine, as well as their intentions to work in rural areas after taking part in community-based clinical clerkships. Community-based clerkships are designed to teach medical students community healthcare and to increase the number of physicians working in rural communities following their graduation. However, few studies have examined which clerkship experiences, specifically, enhance medical students' positive perceptions on community healthcare. This study aimed to examine the association between experiential learning in community-based clerkships and students' positive perceptions on community healthcare. Patients andEntities:
Keywords: community healthcare; community-based clerkship; experiential learning; medical education; mobile medical service
Year: 2019 PMID: 31788145 PMCID: PMC6877912 DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2019-002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Rural Med ISSN: 1880-487X
Figure 1Inclusion criteria.
Students’ clinical clerkship learning areas (N=265)
| Learning areas | Experienced groupN (%) |
|---|---|
| Outpatient care | 163 (61.5) |
| Hospital care | 107 (40.3) |
| Home-visit medical care | 131 (49.4) |
| Home-visit nursing care | 94 (35.4) |
| Day services | 117 (44.1) |
| Rehabilitation | 112 (42.2) |
| Health check-ups | 22 (8.3) |
| Vaccination | 12 (4.5) |
| Health education | 32 (12.0) |
| Placement in mobile medical services | 43 (16.2) |
| On-call work | 14 (5.2) |
| Ambulatory care | 26 (9.8) |
| Placement in welfare facilities | 59 (22.2) |
Experienced group: Students who reported having “experienced” the learning area.
Association between student characteristics, experienced learning areas, and positive change in students’ attitudes towards community healthcare (N=265)
| Positive perception | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| AOR | 95% CI | ||
| Gender (female) | 0.65 | 0.21, 1.86 | 0.41 |
| Originally from a small city of <100,000 people | 0.88 | 0.44, 1.77 | 0.73 |
| Clerkship in a depopulated area | 1.53 | 0.70, 3.34 | 0.28 |
| Outpatient care | 1.24 | 0.61, 2.50 | 0.53 |
| Hospital care | 0.97 | 0.47, 1.98 | 0.94 |
| Home medical care | 1.02 | 0.45, 2.31 | 0.94 |
| Home nursing care | 0.75 | 0.30, 1.88 | 0.54 |
| Day services | 1.52 | 0.65, 3.58 | 0.32 |
| Rehabilitation | 0.57 | 0.26, 1.25 | 0.16 |
| Health check-ups | 0.82 | 0.21, 3.19 | 0.78 |
| Vaccination | 0.81 | 0.12, 5.31 | 0.82 |
| Health education | 0.62 | 0.19, 2.02 | 0.43 |
| Placement in mobile medical services | 6.65 | 1.67, 26.4 | 0.007 |
| On-call work | 1.94 | 0.37, 10.1 | 0.43 |
| Ambulatory care | 0.74 | 0.26, 2.08 | 0.57 |
| Placement in welfare facilities | 0.63 | 0.24, 1.69 | 0.36 |
AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval. p: p value. Positive perception was defined in terms of whether the clerkship positively changed the students’ attitudes. *Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for the above variables.
Association between student characteristics, experienced learning areas, and positive changes in students’ attitudes towards community healthcare (N=265)
| Worthwhile | Confident | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI | |||
| Gender (female) | 0.24 | 0.07, 0.80 | 0.02 | 1.23 | 0.72, 2.11 | 0.43 |
| Originally from a small city of <100,000 people | 0.76 | 0.42, 1.37 | 0.36 | 1.97 | 1.01, 3.84 | 0.04 |
| Clerkship in a depopulated area | 0.92 | 0.49, 1.71 | 0.80 | 1.30 | 0.70, 2.41 | 0.38 |
| Outpatient care | 0.99 | 0.55, 1.79 | 0.99 | 1.39 | 0.76, 2.55 | 0.27 |
| Hospital care | 0.68 | 0.38, 1.23 | 0.21 | 1.05 | 0.57, 1.94 | 0.85 |
| Home medical care | 0.66 | 0.33, 1.31 | 0.24 | 1.08 | 0.53, 2.19 | 0.82 |
| Home nursing care | 0.83 | 0.39, 1.78 | 0.64 | 0.98 | 0.44, 2.15 | 0.96 |
| Day services | 1.34 | 0.66, 2.69 | 0.41 | 1.20 | 0.58, 2.48 | 0.61 |
| Rehabilitation | 0.98 | 0.52, 1.84 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.38, 1.44 | 0.38 |
| Health check-ups | 1.26 | 0.41, 3.88 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.23, 2.58 | 0.68 |
| Vaccination | 0.84 | 0.16, 4.21 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.13, 4.43 | 0.76 |
| Health education | 1.03 | 0.40, 2.67 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.36, 2.82 | 0.97 |
| Placement in mobile medical services | 1.82 | 0.77, 4.30 | 0.16 | 3.09 | 1.19, 8.03 | 0.02 |
| On-call work | 1.09 | 0.32, 3.65 | 0.88 | 4.55 | 0.87, 23.5 | 0.07 |
| Ambulatory care | 1.28 | 0.52, 3.18 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.25, 1.71 | 0.40 |
| Placement in welfare facilities | 1.17 | 0.54, 2.53 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.18, 1.00 | 0.05 |
AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval. Worthwhile defined via a positive response to the item “I think practicing community healthcare is worthwhile”. Confident defined via a positive response to the item “I am confident about practicing community healthcare”. Positive change was defined as a positive difference between pre- and post-training VAS scores on “Worthwhile” and “Confident”. *Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for the above variables.