Literature DB >> 31788136

Practical guide to choosing dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Zen Kobayashi1, Satoru Ishibashi2, Yoshiyuki Numasawa3, Shuzo Shintani1.   

Abstract

Based on previous reports, we propose a practical guide to choose dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with atrial fibrillation. We recommend the use of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily for patients with atrial fibrillation who have a high risk of embolism (e.g., ischemic stroke on other oral anticoagulants, presence of left atrial appendage thrombus) and a low risk of bleeding. However, the prevalence of such patients with atrial fibrillation is considered low because patients with atrial fibrillation with a high risk of embolism usually have a high risk of bleeding. In most other patients with atrial fibrillation, the use of apixaban 5 mg twice daily should be considered. ©2019 The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apixaban; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31788136      PMCID: PMC6877924          DOI: 10.2185/jrm.3019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Med        ISSN: 1880-487X


Introduction

Dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that have been shown to prevent embolisms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in large clinical trials, with each investigating over 10,000 patients. Among the 4 DOACs, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is the sole drug shown to be superior to warfarin for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with AF[1]). In addition, only dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and apixaban 5 mg twice daily have been shown to be superior to warfarin for preventing “stroke or systemic embolic events” in patients with AF[1], [2]). On the other hand, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is higher than that with warfarin[1]). The benefit in terms of ischemic stroke prevention with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is in exchange for a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Based on these results, previous reports on choices of DOACs for patients with AF described that the use of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily should be considered in patients with AF with high embolic and low bleeding risk[3],[4],[5],[6]). For other patients with AF, apixaban can be most widely used for its safety profile[3], [4]). However, there is no practical guide to choose dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with AF. Herein, we propose a practical guide focused on choices of these agents for patients with AF.

Indications of DOACs for Patients with AF

In patients with non-valvular AF, evaluation using the CHADS2 (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75, Diabetes, Stroke [doubled]) score or CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 [doubled], Diabetes, Stroke [doubled]), Vascular disease, Age 65–74, Sex category [female]) score is recommended for the prediction of stroke risk[7]). In addition, evaluation using the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (Age ≥65), Drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score is recommended for the prediction of bleeding risk[7]). In Japanese guidelines[8]), the use of dabigatran or apixaban is recommended for patients with AF with CHADS2 scores ≥1. Asian and European guidelines describe that the use of DOACs should be considered for patients with AF with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥1 for males or ≥2 for females[7], [9]). American guidelines recommend the use of DOACs for patients with AF with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 for males or ≥3 for females[10]). HAS-BLED scores ≥3 suggest a high risk of bleeding, but do not preclude the use of DOACs[7]). Such patients should undergo regular review and follow-up of the modifiable bleeding risk factors[7]).

Practical Guide to Choosing Dabigatran 150 mg Twice Daily or Apixaban 5 mg Twice Daily for Patients with AF

Based on previous reports[3],[4],[5],[6]), we recommend the use of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily for patients with AF who have a high risk of embolism (e.g., ischemic stroke on warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban[3], [5]); presence of left atrial appendage thrombus[4]); or CHADS2 scores ≥5[6])) and a low risk of bleeding (age <75 years, no previous gastrointestinal bleeding, HAS-BLED scores ≤2, and creatinine clearance >50 mL/min) (Table 1). However, the prevalence of such patients with AF is considered low because patients with AF with a high risk of embolism usually have a high risk of bleeding[11]). In most other patients with AF, the use of apixaban 5 mg twice daily should be considered (Table 1). Unlike apixaban, dabigatran has no indications for venous thromboembolism and cannot be crushed and delivered via feeding tubes[3]). However, dabigatran has the only approved antidote, idatucizumab. Direct head-to-head comparison of DOACs in the future may clarify the best anticoagulation therapy for patients with AF.
Table 1

Practical guide to choosing dabigatran 150 mg twice daily or apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with atrial fibrillation

Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is recommended for patients meeting the following 2 criteria:
1. High risk of embolism.
(e.g., ischemic stroke on warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban[3], [5]); presence of left atrial appendage thrombus[4]); or CHADS2 scores ≥5[6]))
2. Low risk of bleeding.
(age <75 years, no previous gastrointestinal bleeding, HAS-BLED scores ≤2, and creatinine clearance >50 mL/min)

Apixaban 5 mg twice daily should be considered for other patients.
CHADS2: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75, Diabetes, Stroke [doubled]; CHA2DS2-VASc: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 [doubled], Diabetes, Stroke [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65–74, Sex category [female]; HAS-BLED: Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (Age ≥ 65), Drugs/alcohol concomitantly.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors received no financial support.
  11 in total

Review 1.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Hugh Calkins; Lin Y Chen; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Karen L Furie; Paul A Heidenreich; Katherine T Murray; Julie B Shea; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  Direct oral anticoagulants: unique properties and practical approaches to management.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Brian Kurtz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.

Authors:  Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas; Stefan Agewall; John Camm; Gonzalo Baron Esquivias; Werner Budts; Scipione Carerj; Filip Casselman; Antonio Coca; Raffaele De Caterina; Spiridon Deftereos; Dobromir Dobrev; José M Ferro; Gerasimos Filippatos; Donna Fitzsimons; Bulent Gorenek; Maxine Guenoun; Stefan H Hohnloser; Philippe Kolh; Gregory Y H Lip; Athanasios Manolis; John McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Raphael Rosenhek; Frank Ruschitzka; Irina Savelieva; Sanjay Sharma; Piotr Suwalski; Juan Luis Tamargo; Clare J Taylor; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Adriaan A Voors; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Choosing the right drug to fit the patient when selecting oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A M Shields; G Y H Lip
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Incorporating edoxaban into the choice of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John Eikelboom
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Reviewing a clinical decision aid for the selection of anticoagulation treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: applications in a US managed care health plan database.

Authors:  Steven B Deitelzweig; Yonghua Jing; Jason P Swindle; Dinara Makenbaeva
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; John J V McMurray; Renato D Lopes; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Jack Ansell; Dan Atar; Alvaro Avezum; M Cecilia Bahit; Rafael Diaz; J Donald Easton; Justin A Ezekowitz; Greg Flaker; David Garcia; Margarida Geraldes; Bernard J Gersh; Sergey Golitsyn; Shinya Goto; Antonio G Hermosillo; Stefan H Hohnloser; John Horowitz; Puneet Mohan; Petr Jansky; Basil S Lewis; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Freek W A Verheugt; Jun Zhu; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  How to choose appropriate direct oral anticoagulant for patient with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jordan K Schaefer; Robert D McBane; Waldemar E Wysokinski
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.673

10.  2017 consensus of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Chern-En Chiang; Ken Okumura; Shu Zhang; Tze-Fan Chao; Chung-Wah Siu; Toon Wei Lim; Anil Saxena; Yoshihide Takahashi; Wee Siong Teo
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.