Literature DB >> 31788017

Correction to: Contour analysis for interpretable leaf shape category discovery.

Jorge Victorino1,2, Francisco Gómez3.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0497-6.].
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31788017      PMCID: PMC6858685          DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0516-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Methods        ISSN: 1746-4811            Impact factor:   4.993


Correction to: Plant Methods (2019) 15:11210.1186/s13007-019-0497-6

Unfortunately, the original version of the article [1] contained an error in Figure 7. The names of species Ulmus minor and Acer campestre were interchanged. The corrected Fig. 7 is given here.
Fig. 7

Groups of leaves samples using for testing the method. The image shows the selected species from the TreeMew and ImageClef datasets. The species with the most quantity of samples were selected. The leaves groups were organized in the following way, Top: Tree leaf database MEW 2010, middle: Clef30a and bottom: Clef30b

Groups of leaves samples using for testing the method. The image shows the selected species from the TreeMew and ImageClef datasets. The species with the most quantity of samples were selected. The leaves groups were organized in the following way, Top: Tree leaf database MEW 2010, middle: Clef30a and bottom: Clef30b
  1 in total

1.  Contour analysis for interpretable leaf shape category discovery.

Authors:  Jorge Victorino; Francisco Gómez
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.993

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.