Literature DB >> 31787783

Current state of the global operational aerosol multi-model ensemble: An update from the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP).

Peng Xian1, Jeffrey S Reid1, Edward J Hyer1, Charles R Sampson1, Juli I Rubin2, Melanie Ades3, Nicole Asencio4, Sara Basart5, Angela Benedetti3, Partha S Bhattacharjee6,7, Malcolm E Brooks8, Peter R Colarco9, Arlindo M da Silva9, Tom F Eck9, Jonathan Guth4, Oriol Jorba5, Rostislav Kouznetsov10,11, Zak Kipling3, Mikhail Sofiev10, Carlos Perez Garcia-Pando5, Yaswant Pradhan8, Taichu Tanaka12, Jun Wang6,7, Douglas L Westphal1, Keiya Yumimoto12,13, Jianglong Zhang14.   

Abstract

Since the first International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP) multi-model ensemble (MME) study, the number of ICAP global operational aerosol models has increased from five to nine. An update of the current ICAP status is provided, along with an evaluation of the performance of ICAP-MME over 2012-2017, with a focus on June 2016-May 2017. Evaluated with ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and data assimilation quality MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrieval products, the ICAP-MME AOD consensus remains the overall top-scoring and most consistent performer among all models in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE), bias and correlation for total, fine- and coarse-mode AODs as well as dust AOD; this is similar to the first ICAP-MME study. Further, over the years, the performance of ICAP-MME is relatively stable and reliable compared to more variability in the individual models. The extent to which the AOD forecast error of ICAP-MME can be predicted is also examined. Leading predictors are found to be the consensus mean and spread. Regression models of absolute forecast errors were built for AOD forecasts of different lengths for potential applications. ICAP-MME performance in terms of modal AOD RMSEs of the 21 regionally representative sites over 2012-2017 suggests a general tendency for model improvements in fine-mode AOD, especially over Asia. No significant improvement in coarse-mode AOD is found overall for this time period.
© 2019 The Authors. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Royal Meteorological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerosol; aerosol forecast; aerosol modelling; ensemble; global aerosol model; multi‐model ensemble; operational aerosol forecast; probabilistic forecast

Year:  2019        PMID: 31787783      PMCID: PMC6876662          DOI: 10.1002/qj.3497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J R Meteorol Soc        ISSN: 0035-9009            Impact factor:   3.739


  7 in total

1.  Organic aerosol growth mechanisms and their climate-forcing implications.

Authors:  Steven F Maria; Lynn M Russell; Mary K Gilles; Satish C B Myneni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China.

Authors:  Song Guo; Min Hu; Misti L Zamora; Jianfei Peng; Dongjie Shang; Jing Zheng; Zhuofei Du; Zhijun Wu; Min Shao; Limin Zeng; Mario J Molina; Renyi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation.

Authors:  C A Randles; A M Da Silva; V Buchard; P R Colarco; A Darmenov; R Govindaraju; A Smirnov; B Holben; R Ferrare; J Hair; Y Shinozuka; C J Flynn
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.148

4.  The implementation of NEMS GFS Aerosol Component (NGAC) Version 1.0 for global dust forecasting at NOAA/NCEP.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsuan Lu; Arlindo da Silva; Jun Wang; Shrinivas Moorthi; Mian Chin; Peter Colarco; Youhua Tang; Partha S Bhattacharjee; Shen-Po Chen; Hui-Ya Chuang; Hann-Ming Henry Juang; Jeffery McQueen; Mark Iredell
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997.

Authors:  V Huijnen; M J Wooster; J W Kaiser; D L A Gaveau; J Flemming; M Parrington; A Inness; D Murdiyarso; B Main; M van Weele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs.

Authors:  Mikhail Sofiev; James J Winebrake; Lasse Johansson; Edward W Carr; Marje Prank; Joana Soares; Julius Vira; Rostislav Kouznetsov; Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen; James J Corbett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Health Impacts of Ambient Air Pollution in Finland.

Authors:  Heli Lehtomäki; Antti Korhonen; Arja Asikainen; Niko Karvosenoja; Kaarle Kupiainen; Ville-Veikko Paunu; Mikko Savolahti; Mikhail Sofiev; Yuliia Palamarchuk; Ari Karppinen; Jaakko Kukkonen; Otto Hänninen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.