Literature DB >> 31787585

Disparities in cancer screening in people with mental illness across the world versus the general population: prevalence and comparative meta-analysis including 4 717 839 people.

Marco Solmi1, Joseph Firth2, Alessandro Miola3, Michele Fornaro4, Elisabetta Frison5, Paolo Fusar-Poli6, Elena Dragioti7, Jae Il Shin8, Andrè F Carvalho9, Brendon Stubbs10, Ai Koyanagi11, Steve Kisely12, Christoph U Correll13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since people with mental illness are more likely to die from cancer, we assessed whether people with mental illness undergo less cancer screening compared with the general population.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and PsycINFO, without a language restriction, and hand-searched the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews for observational studies from database inception until May 5, 2019. We included all published studies focusing on any type of cancer screening in patients with mental illness; and studies that reported prevalence of cancer screening in patients, or comparative measures between patients and the general population. The primary outcome was odds ratio (OR) of cancer screening in people with mental illness versus the general population. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality and I2 to assess study heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018114781.
FINDINGS: 47 publications provided data from 46 samples including 4 717 839 individuals (501 559 patients with mental illness, and 4 216 280 controls), of whom 69·85% were women, for screening for breast cancer (k=35; 296 699 individuals with mental illness, 1 023 288 in the general population), cervical cancer (k=29; 295 688 with mental illness, 3 540 408 in general population), colorectal cancer (k=12; 153 283 with mental illness, 2 228 966 in general population), lung and gastric cancer (both k=1; 420 with mental illness, none in general population), ovarian cancer (k=1; 37 with mental illness, none in general population), and prostate cancer (k=6; 52 803 with mental illness, 2 038 916 in general population). Median quality of the included studies was high at 7 (IQR 6-8). Screening was significantly less frequent in people with any mental disease compared with the general population for any cancer (k=37; OR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72-0·79]; I2=98·53% with publication bias of Egger's p value=0·025), breast cancer (k=27; 0·65 [0·60-0·71]; I2=97·58% and no publication bias), cervical cancer (k=23; 0·89 [0·84-0·95]; I2=98·47% and no publication bias), and prostate cancer (k=4; 0·78 [0·70-0·86]; I2=79·68% and no publication bias), but not for colorectal cancer (k=8; 1·02 [0·90-1·15]; I2=97·84% and no publication bias).
INTERPRETATION: Despite the increased mortality from cancer in people with mental illness, this population receives less cancer screening compared with that of the general population. Specific approaches should be developed to assist people with mental illness to undergo appropriate cancer screening, especially women with schizophrenia. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31787585     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30414-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  20 in total

1.  Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Rinku Sutradhar; Peter C Austin; Vasily Giannakeas; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Lawrence F Paszat; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  The impact of comorbid severe mental illness and common chronic physical health conditions on hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Naomi Launders; Kate Dotsikas; Louise Marston; Gabriele Price; David P J Osborn; Joseph F Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Patients' acceptability and implementation outcomes of a case management approach to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: a qualitative secondary analysis of a mixed-method randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Yuto Yamada; Masaki Fujiwara; Taichi Shimazu; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Masafumi Kodama; Ryuhei So; Takanori Matsushita; Yusaku Yoshimura; Shigeo Horii; Maiko Fujimori; Hirokazu Takahashi; Naoki Nakaya; Tempei Miyaji; Shiro Hinotsu; Keita Harada; Hiroyuki Okada; Yosuke Uchitomi; Norihito Yamada; Masatoshi Inagaki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Reducing global disparities in cancer screening for people with mental illness.

Authors:  Alison R Hwong; Kelly E Irwin
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Cancer Screening Among Adults With and Without Serious Mental Illness: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Karly A Murphy; Elizabeth M Stone; Rachel Presskreischer; Emma E McGinty; Gail L Daumit; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.178

6.  Assessing cardiometabolic parameter monitoring in inpatients taking a second-generation antipsychotic: The CAMI-SGA study - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer Fontaine; Evelyn Chin; Jean-François Provencher; Anthony Rainone; Dana Wazzan; Carmella Roy; Soham Rej; Marie Lordkipanidze; Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Self-reported suboptimal sleep and receipt of sleep assessment and treatment among persons with and without a mental health condition in Australia: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Alexandra P Metse; Caitlin Fehily; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Olivia Wynne; Sharon Lawn; John Wiggers; Jenny A Bowman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Colorectal cancer Outcomes in people with Severe Mental Illness Cohort (COSMIC): a protocol for an Australian retrospective cohort using linked administrative data.

Authors:  Melinda M Protani; Susan J Jordan; Bradley J Kendall; Dan Siskind; David Lawrence; Grant Sara; Lisa Brophy; Steve Kisely
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to cervical cancer screening for women living with behavioral health conditions: a focus group study.

Authors:  Rahma S Mkuu; Stephanie A Staras; Sarah M Szurek; Dalila D'Ingeo; Mary A Gerend; Dianne L Goede; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  The overall and sex- and age-group specific incidence rates of cancer in people with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  D Pettersson; M Gissler; J Hällgren; U Ösby; J Westman; W V Bobo
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.