Literature DB >> 31787211

Detection and localisation of hip fractures on anteroposterior radiographs with artificial intelligence: proof of concept.

J S Yu1, S M Yu2, B S Erdal2, M Demirer2, V Gupta2, M Bigelow2, A Salvador2, T Rink2, S S Lenobel2, L M Prevedello2, R D White2.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of applying a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for detection/localisation of acute proximal femoral fractures (APFFs) on hip radiographs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval. Radiographs of 307 patients with APFFs and 310 normal patients were identified. A split ratio of 3/1/1 was used to create training, validation, and test datasets. To test the validity of the proposed model, a 20-fold cross-validation was performed. The anonymised images from the test cohort were shown to two groups of radiologists: musculoskeletal radiologists and diagnostic radiology residents. Each reader was asked to assess if there was a fracture and localise it if one was detected. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for the CNN and readers.
RESULTS: The mean AUC was 0.9944 with a standard deviation of 0.0036. Mean sensitivity and specificity for fracture detection was 97.1% (81.5/84) and 96.7% (118/122), respectively. There was good concordance with saliency maps for lesion identification, but sensitivity was lower for characterising location (subcapital/transcervical, 84.1%; basicervical/intertrochanteric, 77%; subtrochanteric, 20%). Musculoskeletal radiologists showed a sensitivity and specificity for fracture detection of 100% and 100% respectively, while residents showed 100% and 96.8%, respectively. For fracture localisation, the performance decreased slightly for human readers.
CONCLUSION: The proposed CNN algorithm showed high accuracy for detection of APFFs, but the performance was lower for fracture localisation. Overall performance of the CNN was lower than that of radiologists, especially in localizing fracture location.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31787211     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Y L Kuo; Conrad Harrison; Terry-Ann Curran; Benjamin Jones; Alexander Freethy; David Cussons; Max Stewart; Gary S Collins; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  A deep learning model for diagnosing dystrophinopathies on thigh muscle MRI images.

Authors:  Mei Yang; Yiming Zheng; Zhiying Xie; Zhaoxia Wang; Jiangxi Xiao; Jue Zhang; Yun Yuan
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 3.  Applications of Machine Learning in Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-10-21

4.  AI-based detection and classification of distal radius fractures using low-effort data labeling: evaluation of applicability and effect of training set size.

Authors:  Patrick Tobler; Joshy Cyriac; Balazs K Kovacs; Verena Hofmann; Raphael Sexauer; Fabiano Paciolla; Bram Stieltjes; Felix Amsler; Anna Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.