Claire Minton1, Lesley Batten2, Annette Huntington3. 1. School of Nursing, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Electronic address: C.Minton@massey.ac.nz. 2. College of Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 3. School of Nursing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contemporary intensive care enables many critically ill patients to survive their initial illness; however, a small group of patients require a protracted stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), experiencing many complications throughout their illness. It is only when we understand the total illness experience from patients' and families' perspectives, as well as the complexity of care for healthcare professionals, that we can fully engage in developing services and promoting evidence-based practice to improve broad health outcomes and experiences for all groups. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the trajectories of a prolonged critical illness in an ICU from the experiences of the patient, their family, and the healthcare professionals who provide care. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, qualitative, multicase study of six cases from four New Zealand ICUs. Theoretical underpinnings were informed by the Chronic Illness Trajectory Framework. Each case consisted of the patient, their family members, and nurses and other healthcare professionals who provided care. Data collection methods included observations, conversations, interviews, and document review. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and trajectory mapping. RESULTS: Regardless of the patient's admitting diagnosis, the trajectory of a prolonged critical illness is made up of common phases, determined by the patient's physiological condition. However, all subphases represented different psychosocial needs. The patients' debilitated state made them susceptible to complications and added to the complexity of their trajectory. The family's trajectory was informed by the patient's trajectory, and uncertainty dominated throughout. Each phase of the illness presented different challenges for healthcare professionals as they cared for this complex group of patients. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the distinct phases of a prolonged critical illness. Knowledge of these phases provides the ground work for improving care, not only for patients but also for their family and the healthcare professionals who provided care.
BACKGROUND: Contemporary intensive care enables many critically ill patients to survive their initial illness; however, a small group of patients require a protracted stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), experiencing many complications throughout their illness. It is only when we understand the total illness experience from patients' and families' perspectives, as well as the complexity of care for healthcare professionals, that we can fully engage in developing services and promoting evidence-based practice to improve broad health outcomes and experiences for all groups. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the trajectories of a prolonged critical illness in an ICU from the experiences of the patient, their family, and the healthcare professionals who provide care. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, qualitative, multicase study of six cases from four New Zealand ICUs. Theoretical underpinnings were informed by the Chronic Illness Trajectory Framework. Each case consisted of the patient, their family members, and nurses and other healthcare professionals who provided care. Data collection methods included observations, conversations, interviews, and document review. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and trajectory mapping. RESULTS: Regardless of the patient's admitting diagnosis, the trajectory of a prolonged critical illness is made up of common phases, determined by the patient's physiological condition. However, all subphases represented different psychosocial needs. The patients' debilitated state made them susceptible to complications and added to the complexity of their trajectory. The family's trajectory was informed by the patient's trajectory, and uncertainty dominated throughout. Each phase of the illness presented different challenges for healthcare professionals as they cared for this complex group of patients. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the distinct phases of a prolonged critical illness. Knowledge of these phases provides the ground work for improving care, not only for patients but also for their family and the healthcare professionals who provided care.