Literature DB >> 31785747

Outcomes of Primary Biceps Subpectoral Tenodesis in an Active Population: A Prospective Evaluation of 101 Patients.

Matthew T Provencher1, Frank McCormick2, Liam A Peebles3, Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones4, Travis J Dekker5, Lance E LeClere6, Shawn Anthony7, Daniel J Solomon8, Petar Golijanin4, Christopher Dewing9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of a primary subpectoral biceps tenodesis for long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology in a large cohort of prospectively, serially collected, patients in a young active population that has known high physical demands and requirements of their shoulder to perform their vocation.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from an active military personnel with a diagnosis of a Type II SLAP tear or biceps tenosynovitis was performed. Outcomes were evaluated at a minimum follow-up time of 18 months based on preoperative and postoperative assessments of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, biceps position, and return to active duty. Inclusion criteria were (1) SLAP tears on magnetic resonance arthrogram (classified into SLAP group), and (2) no SLAP tear but examination findings of biceps tendonitis (placed in the LHBT tendonitis group). Patients were excluded for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, high-grade partial thickness tears requiring repair, acromioclavicular joint pathology, and labral pathology outside of the SLAP lesion. Patients from both groups subsequently were treated with open, subpectoral tenodesis.
RESULTS: Over a 6-year period at a mean follow-up of 2.75 years (range 1.5-5.7 years), 125 active-duty military personnel with mean age of 42.6 years (range 26.3-56.5) were enrolled. A total of 101 of 125 patients (81%) completed study requirements at a mean of 2.75 years (range 1.5-5.7 years). In total, 40 patients were diagnosed with type II SLAP tears (39.6%) and 61 with biceps tendonitis without SLAP tear (60.4%). Following open, subpectoral tenodesis, there was a significant improvement in patient outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff = 54% preoperative vs 89% postoperative, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation = 58 preoperative vs 89.5 postoperative, P < .01). In total, 82% of patients returned to full activity at a mean of 4.1 months. The biceps muscle measured relative to the antecubital fossa of operative (mean 3.20 cm) versus nonoperative (3.11 cm) was not clinically different (P = .57). There was an 8% complication rate, including 3 requiring revision, 2 superficial infections, and 3 transient neurapraxias.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary subpectoral open biceps tenodesis for SLAP tears or pathology of the LHBT provides significant improvement in shoulder outcomes with a reliable return to activity level with low risk for complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (Case series).
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31785747     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

Review 1.  The rate and reporting of fracture after biceps tenodesis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hailey P Huddleston; Joey S Kurtzman; Samuel Gedailovich; Steven M Koehler; William R Aibinder
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 2.  Superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions of the long bicep insertion on the glenoid: management in athletes.

Authors:  Juan Martín Patiño
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Revision Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With Allograft Tendon Reconstruction for Symptomatic Failed Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Joseph W Galvin; B Gage Griswold; Peter M Van Steyn; Michael J Steflik; Stephen A Parada
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Cost Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Treatment Options for SLAP Tears.

Authors:  Lambert T Li; Carlin Chuck; Steven L Bokshan; Steven F DeFroda; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-30

5.  Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis Improves Outcomes for SLAP Repair: Minimum 2-Year Clinical Outcomes after SLAP II-IV Repair Versus Tenodesis Versus Both.

Authors:  T J Ridley; Marilee P Horan; Philip-C Nolte; Bryant P Elrick; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  The Lark Loop Used for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis: An All-Arthroscopic Technique.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Chuan-Hai Zhou; Jin-Ming Zhang; Long Yi; Jiang Guo; Jing-Yi Hou; Rui Yang
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  The high resistance loop (H-loop) technique used for all-inside arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: A case series.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Chuanhai Zhou; Dedong Cui; Yi Long; Jiang Guo; Zhenze Zheng; Ke Meng; Jinming Zhang; Jingyi Hou; Rui Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.