Emmanuel Fortier1, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre2, Andreea Adelina Artenie2, Nanor Minoyan2, Didier Jutras-Aswad3, Élise Roy4, Jason Grebely5, Julie Bruneau6. 1. CHUM Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 2. CHUM Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 3. CHUM Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 4. Addiction Research and Study Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada. 5. The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6. CHUM Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: julie.bruneau@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between housing stability and drug injecting is complex, as both outcomes fluctuate over time. The objectives were to identify short-term trajectories of housing stability and injecting frequency among people who inject drugs (PWID) and examine how patterns of injecting frequency relate to those of housing stability. METHODS: At three-month intervals, PWID enrolled between 2011 and 2016 in the Hepatitis Cohort completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and were tested for hepatitis C and HIV infections. At each visit, participants reported, for each of the past three months, the accommodation they lived in the longest (stable/unstable) and the number of injecting days (0-30). Group-based dual trajectory modeling was conducted to identify housing stability and injecting frequency trajectories evolving concomitantly over 12 months and estimate the probabilities of following injecting trajectories conditional upon housing trajectories. RESULTS: 386 participants were included (mean age 40.0, 82 % male). Three housing stability trajectories were identified: sustained (53 %), declining (20 %), and improving (27 %). Five injecting frequency trajectories were identified: sporadic (26 %), infrequent (34 %), increasing (15 %), decreasing (11 %), and frequent (13 %). PWID with improving housing were less likely to increase injecting (8 %) compared to those with sustained (17 %) or declining housing (17 %). CONCLUSIONS: Improving housing was associated with a lower probability of increasing injecting compared to declining housing, while sustained housing stability was associated with a higher probability of increasing injecting compared to improving housing. Therefore, policies to improve PWID's access to stable housing are warranted and may reduce, to some extent, drug injecting and related harms.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between housing stability and drug injecting is complex, as both outcomes fluctuate over time. The objectives were to identify short-term trajectories of housing stability and injecting frequency among people who inject drugs (PWID) and examine how patterns of injecting frequency relate to those of housing stability. METHODS: At three-month intervals, PWID enrolled between 2011 and 2016 in the Hepatitis Cohort completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and were tested for hepatitis C and HIV infections. At each visit, participants reported, for each of the past three months, the accommodation they lived in the longest (stable/unstable) and the number of injecting days (0-30). Group-based dual trajectory modeling was conducted to identify housing stability and injecting frequency trajectories evolving concomitantly over 12 months and estimate the probabilities of following injecting trajectories conditional upon housing trajectories. RESULTS: 386 participants were included (mean age 40.0, 82 % male). Three housing stability trajectories were identified: sustained (53 %), declining (20 %), and improving (27 %). Five injecting frequency trajectories were identified: sporadic (26 %), infrequent (34 %), increasing (15 %), decreasing (11 %), and frequent (13 %). PWID with improving housing were less likely to increase injecting (8 %) compared to those with sustained (17 %) or declining housing (17 %). CONCLUSIONS: Improving housing was associated with a lower probability of increasing injecting compared to declining housing, while sustained housing stability was associated with a higher probability of increasing injecting compared to improving housing. Therefore, policies to improve PWID's access to stable housing are warranted and may reduce, to some extent, drug injecting and related harms.
Authors: Hansel E Tookes; Tyler S Bartholomew; Edward Suarez; Elisha Ekowo; Margaret Ginoza; David W Forrest; David P Serota; Allan Rodriguez; Michael A Kolber; Daniel J Feaster; Angela Mooss; Derek Boyd; Candice Sternberg; Lisa R Metsch Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Jack Stone; Adelina Artenie; Matthew Hickman; Natasha K Martin; Louisa Degenhardt; Hannah Fraser; Peter Vickerman Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2022-01-07