Literature DB >> 31785420

The relationship between BOLD and neural activity arises from temporally sparse events.

Xiaodi Zhang1, Wen-Ju Pan2, Shella Dawn Keilholz3.   

Abstract

Resting state functional magnetic resonance (rs-fMRI) imaging offers insights into how different brain regions are connected into functional networks. It was recently shown that networks that are almost identical to the ones created from conventional correlation analysis can be obtained from a subset of high-amplitude data, suggesting that the functional networks may be driven by instantaneous co-activations of multiple brain regions rather than ongoing oscillatory processes. The rs-fMRI studies, however, rely on the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal, which is only indirectly sensitive to neural activity through neurovascular coupling. To provide more direct evidence that the neuronal co-activation events produce the time-varying network patterns seen in rs-fMRI studies, we examined the simultaneous rs-fMRI and local field potential (LFP) recordings in rats performed in our lab over the past several years. We developed complementary analysis methods that focus on either the temporal or spatial domain, and found evidence that the interaction between LFP and BOLD may be driven by instantaneous co-activation events as well. BOLD maps triggered on high-amplitude LFP events resemble co-activation patterns created from rs-fMRI data alone, though the co-activation time points are defined differently in the two cases. Moreover, only LFP events that fall into the highest or lowest thirds of the amplitude distribution result in a BOLD signal that can be distinguished from noise. These findings provide evidence of an electrophysiological basis for the time-varying co-activation patterns observed in previous studies.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BOLD; BOLD-Triggered average; Electrophysiology; Instantaneous co-activation; Resting state fMRI

Year:  2019        PMID: 31785420      PMCID: PMC7252681          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of animal models toward understanding resting state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Patricia Pais-Roldán; Celine Mateo; Wen-Ju Pan; Ben Acland; David Kleinfeld; Lawrence H Snyder; Xin Yu; Shella Keilholz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 7.400

2.  Midazolam and Ketamine Produce Distinct Neural Changes in Memory, Pain, and Fear Networks during Pain.

Authors:  Keith M Vogt; James W Ibinson; C Tyler Smith; Ally T Citro; Caroline M Norton; Helmet T Karim; Vencislav Popov; Aman Mahajan; Howard J Aizenstein; Lynne M Reder; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.986

3.  Comparison of Resting-State Functional MRI Methods for Characterizing Brain Dynamics.

Authors:  Eric Maltbie; Behnaz Yousefi; Xiaodi Zhang; Amrit Kashyap; Shella Keilholz
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Using carpet plots to analyze transit times of low frequency oscillations in resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Bradley Fitzgerald; Jinxia Fiona Yao; Thomas M Talavage; Lia M Hocke; Blaise deB Frederick; Yunjie Tong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Functional Connectivity of the Brain Across Rodents and Humans.

Authors:  Nan Xu; Theodore J LaGrow; Nmachi Anumba; Azalea Lee; Xiaodi Zhang; Behnaz Yousefi; Yasmine Bassil; Gloria P Clavijo; Vahid Khalilzad Sharghi; Eric Maltbie; Lisa Meyer-Baese; Maysam Nezafati; Wen-Ju Pan; Shella Keilholz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Moving beyond the 'CAP' of the Iceberg: Intrinsic connectivity networks in fMRI are continuously engaging and overlapping.

Authors:  A Iraji; A Faghiri; Z Fu; P Kochunov; B M Adhikari; A Belger; J M Ford; S McEwen; D H Mathalon; G D Pearlson; S G Potkin; A Preda; J A Turner; T G M Van Erp; C Chang; V D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Contextual experience modifies functional connectome indices of topological strength and efficiency.

Authors:  Marjory Pompilus; Luis M Colon-Perez; Matteo M Grudny; Marcelo Febo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity.

Authors:  Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani; Youngheun Jo; Joshua Faskowitz; Lisa Byrge; Daniel P Kennedy; Olaf Sporns; Richard F Betzel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Relationship Between Basic Properties of BOLD Fluctuations and Calculated Metrics of Complexity in the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Shella Keilholz; Eric Maltbie; Xiaodi Zhang; Behnaz Yousefi; Wen-Ju Pan; Nan Xu; Maysam Nezafati; Theodore J LaGrow; Ying Guo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Resting Brain Fluctuations Are Intrinsically Coupled to Visual Response Dynamics.

Authors:  Michaël E Belloy; Jacob Billings; Anzar Abbas; Amrit Kashyap; Wen-Ju Pan; Rukun Hinz; Verdi Vanreusel; Johan Van Audekerke; Annemie Van der Linden; Shella D Keilholz; Marleen Verhoye; Georgios A Keliris
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.