Literature DB >> 31785375

Impact of Plerixafor Use at Different Peripheral Blood CD34+ Thresholds on Autologous Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Eshana E Shah1, Rebecca P Young2, Sandy W Wong3, Lloyd E Damon3, Jeffrey L Wolf3, Nina D Shah3, Andrew D Leavitt4, Paula Loeffler5, Thomas G Martin6.   

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) scheduled for autologous stem cell transplantation must undergo autologous stem cell mobilization; unfortunately, however, many do not obtain an adequate collection yield. Despite the availability of plerixafor, its widespread and uniform use is limited by its cost, and consequently, many institutions have adopted various risk-adapted algorithms. We report our mobilization experience as we have modified our plerixafor algorithm to a more liberal one, with the expectation of greater collection efficiency and mobilization success with higher plerixafor use. A total of 344 mobilization attempts were analyzed over 3 time periods and using 3 different peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts to guide plerixafor use: <15/µL (n = 66), <20/µL (n = 130), and <40/µL (n = 148). The primary endpoints were evaluation of changes in mean plerixafor utilization and apheresis days and assessment of the impact on overall mobilization costs. Secondary endpoints were a description of the impact of lenalidomide use on mobilization and evaluation of the rate of mobilization failure. We found that mean plerixafor use increased from 1.32 to 1.65 to 1.74 doses per mobilization (P = .026) and the mean days of apheresis decreased from 2.15 to 2.17 to 1.89 days per mobilization for the <15/µL, <20/µL, and <40/µL cohorts, respectively (P = .011). The combined cost of plerixafor and apheresis procedures at a threshold of 40/µL is close to that at a threshold of 15/µL, while saving 26 apheresis days per 100 patients. In general, there were low rates of mobilization failure across all thresholds. Patients who received more than 6 cycles of lenalidomide demonstrated impaired mobilization and required more apheresis sessions (P < .013) and greater plerixafor use (P < .001) to achieve target stem cell yields. Overall, using plerixafor in patients with MM, with a day 4 pCD34 count of <40/µL is a reasonable and cost-effective strategy to optimize apheresis utilization.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous stem cell collection; Mobilization; Mozobil; Multiple myeloma; Plerixafor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31785375     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  5 in total

1.  Significant costs and low utilization of stored peripheral blood stem cells for salvage autologous transplant in multiple myeloma patients including those meeting mSMART criteria.

Authors:  Nausheen Ahmed; Lucy Li; Patricio Rojas; Fahrettin Covut; Jane Reese-Koc; Merle Kolk; Ehsan Malek; Leland Metheny; Timothy O'Brien; Paolo Caimi; Marcos de Lima; Brenda W Cooper
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.

Authors:  Andrew Johnsrud; Abdullah Ladha; Lori Muffly; Parveen Shiraz; Gary Goldstein; Victoria Osgood; Judith A Shizuru; Laura Johnston; Sally Arai; Wen-Kai Weng; Robert Lowsky; Andrew R Rezvani; Everett H Meyer; Matthew J Frank; Robert S Negrin; David B Miklos; Surbhi Sidana
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Incorporating hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after second-line carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd).

Authors:  Ja Min Byun; Sung-Soo Yoon; Youngil Koh; Chang-Ki Min; Jae Hoon Lee; Jaemin Jo; Hyunkyung Park; Jiyun Lee; Ka-Won Kang; Yoojin Lee
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2020-05-12

4.  The Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy-Based Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Poor Responders to Induction: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

Authors:  Iuliana Vaxman; Eli Muchtar; Eapen Jacob; Prashant Kapoor; Shaji Kumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis Buadi; David Dingli; Wilson Gonsalves; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Martha Lacy; William Hogan; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-06-18

5.  Stem cell yield and transplantation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving daratumumab + bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone in the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study.

Authors:  Cyrille Hulin; Fritz Offner; Philippe Moreau; Murielle Roussel; Karim Belhadj; Lotfi Benboubker; Denis Caillot; Thierry Facon; Laurent Garderet; Frédérique Kuhnowski; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Brigitte Kolb; Mourad Tiab; Kon-Siong Jie; Matthijs Westerman; Jérôme Lambert; Lixia Pei; Veronique Vanquickelberghe; Carla De Boer; Jessica Vermeulen; Tobias Kampfenkel; Pieter Sonneveld; Niels W C J Van de Donk
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.