Literature DB >> 31785062

Longitudinal Reproducibility of MR Perfusion Using 3D Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling With Hadamard-Encoded Multiple Postlabeling Delays.

Alexander D Cohen1, Mohit Agarwal1, Amritpal S Jagra1, Andrew S Nencka1, Timothy B Meier2, R Marc Lebel3, Michael A McCrea2, Yang Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) can be confounded by varying arterial transit times (ATT) across the brain and with disease. Hadamard encoding schemes can be applied to 3D pseudocontinuous ASL (pCASL) to acquire ASL data with multiple postlabeling delays (PLDs) to estimate ATT and then correct cerebral blood flow (CBF).
PURPOSE: To assess the longitudinal reproducibility of 3D pCASL with Hadamard-encoded multiple PLDs. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, longitudinal. POPULATION: Fifty-two healthy, right-handed male subjects who underwent imaging at four timepoints over 45 days. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A Hadamard-encoded 3D pCASL sequence was acquired at 3.0T with seven PLDs from 1.0-3.7 sec. ASSESSMENT: ATT and corrected CBF (cCBF) were computed. Conventional uncorrected CBF (unCBF) was also estimated. Within- and between-subject coefficient of variation (wCV and bCV, respectively) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were evaluated across four time intervals: 7, 14, 30, and 45 days, in gray matter and 17 independent regions of interest (ROIs). A power analysis was also conducted. STATISTICAL TESTS: A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare ATT, cCBF, and unCBF across the four scan sessions. A paired two-sample t-test was used to compare cCBF and unCBF. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between the cCBF and unCBF difference and ATT. Power calculations were completed using both the cCBF and unCBF variances.
RESULTS: ATT showed the lowest wCV and bCV (3.3-4.4% and 6.0-6.3%, respectively) compared to both cCBF (10.5-11.7% and 20.6-22.2%, respectively) and unCBF (12.0-13.6% and 22.7-23.7%, respectively). wCV and bCV were lower for cCBF vs. unCBF. A significant difference between cCBF and unCBF was found in most regions (P = 5.5 × 10-5 -3.8 × 10-4 in gray matter) that was highly correlated with ATT (R2 = 0.79-0.86). A power analysis yielded acceptable power at feasible sample sizes using cCBF. DATA
CONCLUSION: ATT and ATT-corrected CBF were longitudinally stable, indicating that ATT and CBF changes can be reliably evaluated with Hadamard-encoded 3D pCASL with multiple PLDs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1846-1853.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arterial spin labeling; arterial transit time; cerebral blood flow; postlabeling delay; reproducibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31785062     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy using multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Hongyang Li; Jiao Sun; Huihui Wang; Yanling Wang; Zhenchang Wang; Jing Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Cerebrovascular reactivity measurements using simultaneous 15O-water PET and ASL MRI: Impacts of arterial transit time, labeling efficiency, and hematocrit.

Authors:  Moss Y Zhao; Audrey P Fan; David Yen-Ting Chen; Magdalena J Sokolska; Jia Guo; Yosuke Ishii; David D Shin; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Dawn Holley; Kim Halbert; Andrea Otte; Brittney Williams; Taghi Rostami; Jun-Hyung Park; Bin Shen; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multiphase arterial spin labeling imaging to predict early recurrent ischemic lesion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Chi Kyung Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Ki-Woong Nam; Byung-Woo Yoon; Inpyeong Hwang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Enhanced Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Blood Flow of the Anterior and Posterior Circulations in Patients With Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hongwei Yu; Yangchen Li; Yibo Feng; Linwei Zhang; Zeshan Yao; Zunjing Liu; Wenwen Gao; Yue Chen; Sheng Xie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The Diagnostic Value of the Combined 3D Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Patients With Binswanger's Disease.

Authors:  Xiaoyi He; Weiqiang Dou; Hao Shi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Sensitivity of Arterial Spin Labeling for Characterization of Longitudinal Perfusion Changes in Frontotemporal Dementia and Related Disorders.

Authors:  Tracy Ssali; Udunna C Anazodo; Lucas Narciso; Linshan Liu; Sarah Jesso; Lauryn Richardson; Matthias Günther; Simon Konstandin; Klaus Eickel; Frank Prato; Elizabeth Finger; Keith St Lawrence
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.891

7.  Cerebrovascular Reservoir and Arterial Transit Time Changes Assessed by Acetazolamide-Challenged Multi-Phase Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion MRI in Chronic Cerebrovascular Steno-Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Inpyeong Hwang; Chul-Ho Sohn; Keun-Hwa Jung; Eung Koo Yeon; Ji Ye Lee; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Seung Hong Choi; Ji-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of ASL Perfusion MRI in Mild TBI.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Hannah M Bartels; Lindsay D Nelson
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 7.444

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.