| Literature DB >> 31784841 |
Zhongyun Yuan1, Zhen Pei1, Muhammad Shahbaz, Qiang Zhang1, Kai Zhuo1, Chun Zhao2, Wendong Zhang1, Xingyi Ma1,3, Shengbo Sang4.
Abstract
Soft-strain-based sensors are being increasingly used across various fields, including wearable sensing, behavior monitoring, and electrophysiological diagnostics. However, throughout all applications, the function of these sensors is limited because of high sensitivity, high-dynamic range, and low-power consumption. In this paper, we focus on improving the sensitivity and strain range of the soft-strain-based sensor through structure, surface, and sensitive unit treatment. Nanosilver (Ag)-coated hydroxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (OH-f MWCNTs) were explored for highly acute sensing. With stretching and depositing methods, Ag@OH-f MWCNTs and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) are fabricated into a wrinkled and sandwich structure for a soft-strain-based sensor. The electronic properties were characterized in that the gauge factor (GF) = ΔR/R0 was 412.32, and the strain range was 42.2%. Moreover, our soft-strain-based sensor exhibits features including flexibility, ultra-lightweight and a highly comfortable experience in terms of wearability. Finally, some physiological and behavioral features can be sampled by testing the exceptional resistance change, including the detection of breath, as well as facial and hand movement recognition. The experiment exhibits its superiority in terms of being highly sensitive and having an extensive range of sensing.Entities:
Keywords: Ag@CNT; Breath detection; Hydroxyl-functionalized CNT; Movement recognition; PDMS; Soft-strain sensor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31784841 PMCID: PMC6884602 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-019-3186-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Fabrication process flowchart of the sensor
Fig. 2a TEM image of Ag@OH-f MWCNTs. b HRTEM image of Ag@OH-f MWCNTs. c SEM image of Ag@OH-f MWCNTs. d Cross-section SEM image of Ag@OH-f MWCNT-based soft strain sensor with wrinkled structure
Fig. 3Water contact angle of PDMS (a) before and (b) after oxygen plasma surface treatment. c Schematic model of PDMS pre-stretching and oxygen plasma surface treatment
Fig. 4Stretch test of the soft strain sensor. a, (b), and (c) Schematic sensing model; I-V curves of (d) Ag@OH-f MWCNT-based soft strain sensor without wrinkled structure and (e) Ag@OH-f MWCNT-based soft strain sensor with wrinkled structure. The relative resistance changes of the sensors with (f) Ag@OH-f MWCNT-based soft strain sensor without wrinkled structure and (g) Ag@OH-f MWCNT-based soft strain sensor with wrinkled structure
Fig. 5Portable breathing detector based on Ag@OH-f MWCNT soft strain sensor with wrinkled structure. a Breathing in and (b) breathing out. Pictures of the (c) top and (d) bottom sight from the portable breathing detector. e Facial, (f) frown, and (g) smile expression recognition of blink
Performance comparison of soft strain sensor materials
| Materials | Stretchability | Linearity | Conductivity | Stability | Gauge factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNT | 30–150% | Linear | Low | Good | 1 |
| AgNWs | 70% | Linear up to 40% | High | Good | 2–14 |
| CuNWs | 10%–250% | N/A | Low | Unstable | 54.4 |
| AuNWs | 100% | Linear | Low | Good | 20.4–61.4 |
| ZnONws | 2% | Linear | N/a | N/A | 114 |
| Platinum (Pt) | 2% | Nonlinear | High | Unstable | 2000 |
| Hybride materials | 140%–490% | N/A | High | N/A | 24–95 |
| This work | Linear | High | Excellent |