Literature DB >> 31784781

Stress radiography at 30° of knee flexion is a reliable evaluation tool for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees.

Seong Hwan Kim1, Yong-Beom Park2, Dae-Woong Ham3, Jung-Won Lim3, Han-Jun Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of stress radiography and determine the cutoff values for high-grade anterolateral rotatory laxity in complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees at different positions.
METHODS: Forty-two patients with complete ACL rupture (group 1) and 37 normal subjects (group 2) were prospectively enrolled. The amount of anterior translation in the medial (MM) and lateral (LL) distance compartments and the difference between them (LL-MM distance) were measured using stress radiography at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° positions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed for the presence of a high-grade (grade > 2) pivot shift.
RESULTS: The MM and LL distances in group 1 were significantly different at 30° and 45° positions (P < 0.05). The AUC of the MM (AUC, 0.903) and LL (AUC, 0.901) distances at the 30° position was significantly higher than that of the other positions (P = 0.000); however, the cutoff values were different to diagnose ACL injury (MM vs. LL, 3.1 mm vs. 5.4 mm). A 2.1-mm cutoff for the LL-MM distance showed 78.4% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for detecting the presence of a high-grade pivot shift (AUC = 0.905, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: The cutoff values of stress radiography differed according to anatomical references and knee flexion positions. Stress radiography of a 2.1 mm difference in LL-MM distance at 30° of knee flexion can be a reliable method for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, diagnostic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterolateral rotatory instability; Pivot shift; Rotatory laxity; Stress radiograph

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31784781     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05803-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Clayton Lane; Musa Citak; Russell F Warren; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Travis Maak; Musa Citak; Peter Dixon; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  J Beldame; S Bertiaux; X Roussignol; B Lefebvre; J-M Adam; F Mouilhade; F Dujardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; James Robinson; Pascal Christel; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Patrick Djian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Benjaminse; Alli Gokeler; Cees P van der Schans
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Clinical relevance of static and dynamic tests after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Knee laxity control in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos(®) and "Lerat", and GNRB(®) arthrometer.

Authors:  J Beldame; S Mouchel; S Bertiaux; J-M Adam; F Mouilhade; X Roussignol; F Dujardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  Causes of Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Revision Surgical Strategies.

Authors:  Paolo Di Benedetto; Enrico Di Benedetto; Andrea Fiocchi; Alessandro Beltrame; Araldo Causero
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-01

10.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Daniël A Korevaar; Douglas G Altman; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Lotty Hooft; Les Irwig; Deborah Levine; Johannes B Reitsma; Henrica C W de Vet; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Midterm results of a new personalized knee implant for total knee arthroplasty: implant survivorship and patient-reported outcome after five years' follow-up.

Authors:  Cristina Dauder Gallego; Irene Blanca Moreno Fenoll; José Luis Patiño Contreras; Francisco Javier Moreno Coronas; María Del Carmen Torrejón de la Cal; Javier Martínez Martín
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-02

2.  Steep posterior lateral tibial slope, bone contusion on lateral compartments and combined medial collateral ligament injury are associated with the increased risk of lateral meniscal tear.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jeung-Hwan Seo; Dae-An Kim; Joong-Won Lee; Kang-Il Kim; Sang Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.