Literature DB >> 31784493

Blood-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Appendiceal Cancers.

Walid L Shaib1, Katerina Zakka1, Charles Staley2, Ali Roberts3, Mehmet Akce1, Christina Wu1, Olatunji B Alese1, Bassel F El-Rayes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal cancers (ACs) are rare. The genomic landscape of ACs has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to confirm the feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in ACs and characterize common genomic alterations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular alterations in 372 plasma samples from 303 patients with AC using clinical-grade NGS of ctDNA (Guardant360) across multiple institutions were evaluated. Test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes.
RESULTS: A total of 303 patients with AC were evaluated, of which 169 (56%) were female. Median age was 56.8 (25-83) years. ctDNA NGS testing was performed on 372 plasma samples; 48 patients had testing performed twice, 9 patients had testing performed three times, and 1 patient had testing performed four times. Genomic alterations were defined in 207 (n = 207/372, 55.6%) samples, and 288 alterations were identified excluding variants of uncertain significance and synonymous mutations. Alterations were identified in at least one sample from 184 patients; TP53-associated genes (n = 71, 38.6%), KRAS (n = 33, 17.9%), APC (n = 14, 7.6%), EGFR (n = 12, 6.5%), BRAF (n = 11, 5.9%), NF1 (n = 10, 5.4%), MYC (n = 9, 4.9%), GNAS (n = 8, 4.3%), MET (n = 6, 3.3%), PIK3CA (n = 5, 2.7%), and ATM (n = 5, 2.7%). Other low-frequency but clinically relevant genomic alterations were as follows: AR (n = 4, 2.2%), TERT (n = 4, 2.2%), ERBB2 (n = 4, 2.2%), SMAD4 (n = 3, 1.6%), CDK4 (n = 2, 1.1%), NRAS (n = 2, 1.1%), FGFR1 (n = 2, 1.1%), FGFR2 (n = 2, 1.1%), PTEN (n = 2, 1.1%), RB1 (n = 2, 1.1%), and CDK6, CDKN2A, BRCA1, BRCA2, JAK2, IDH2, MAPK, NTRK1, CDH1, ARID1A, and PDGFRA (n = 1, 0.5%).
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of ctDNA is feasible among patients with AC. The frequency of genomic alterations is similar to that previously reported in tissue NGS. Liquid biopsies are not invasive and can provide personalized options for targeted therapies in patients with AC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The complexity of appendiceal cancer and its unique genomic characteristics suggest that customized combination therapy may be required for many patients. Theoretically, as more oncogenic pathways are discovered and more targeted therapies are approved, customized treatment based on the patient's unique molecular profile will lead to personalized care and improve patient outcomes. Liquid biopsies are noninvasive, cost-effective, and promising methods that provide patients with access to personalized treatment. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendiceal Cancer; Next-generation sequencing; ctDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31784493      PMCID: PMC7216457          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  34 in total

Review 1.  The genetic basis of colorectal cancer: insights into critical pathways of tumorigenesis.

Authors:  D C Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Microsatellite instability: the mutator that mutates the other mutator.

Authors:  M Perucho
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Walid L Shaib; Rita Assi; Ali Shamseddine; Olatunji B Alese; Charles Staley; Bahar Memis; Volkan Adsay; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-29

4.  BRAF mutation may have different prognostic implications in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kuo-Hsing Chen; Yu-Lin Lin; Jau-Yu Liau; Jia-Huei Tsai; Li-Hui Tseng; Liang-In Lin; Jin-Tung Liang; Been-Ren Lin; Ji-Shiang Hung; Yih-Leong Chang; Kun-Huei Yeh; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Biomarker Tests for Molecularly Targeted Therapies--The Key to Unlocking Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Harold L Moses
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical relevance of circulating KRAS mutated DNA in plasma from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kjersti Tjensvoll; Morten Lapin; Tove Buhl; Satu Oltedal; Katrine Steen-Ottosen Berry; Bjørnar Gilje; Jon Arne Søreide; Millind Javle; Oddmund Nordgård; Rune Smaaland
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Costs of Diagnostic Assessment for Lung Cancer: A Medicare Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Tasneem Lokhandwala; Marisa A Bittoni; Robert A Dann; Anna O D'Souza; Meridith Johnson; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Robert E Merritt; David P Carbone
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Genomic analysis of circulating cell-free DNA infers breast cancer dormancy.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Shaw; Karen Page; Kevin Blighe; Natasha Hava; David Guttery; Becky Ward; James Brown; Chetana Ruangpratheep; Justin Stebbing; Rachel Payne; Carlo Palmieri; Suzy Cleator; Rosemary A Walker; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Capturing intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity by de novo mutation profiling of circulating cell-free tumor DNA: a proof-of-principle.

Authors:  L De Mattos-Arruda; B Weigelt; J Cortes; H H Won; C K Y Ng; P Nuciforo; F-C Bidard; C Aura; C Saura; V Peg; S Piscuoglio; M Oliveira; Y Smolders; P Patel; L Norton; J Tabernero; M F Berger; J Seoane; J S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Breast cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Luciano G Martelotto; Charlotte K Y Ng; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  In Reply.

Authors:  Walid Shaib
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-21

2.  Regarding Blood-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Appendiceal Cancers.

Authors:  John Paul Shen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-21

3.  Anchored Multiplex PCR Custom Melanoma Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Russell J Diefenbach; Jenny H Lee; Ashleigh Stewart; Alexander M Menzies; Matteo S Carlino; Robyn P M Saw; Jonathan R Stretch; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer; Helen Rizos
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Blood-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bassel Nazha; Tony Z Zhuang; Hiba I Dada; Leylah M Drusbosky; Jacqueline T Brown; Deepak Ravindranathan; Bradley C Carthon; Omer Kucuk; Jamie Goldman; Viraj A Master; Mehmet Asim Bilen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.837

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.