Literature DB >> 31784385

Viewing perspective malrotation influences angular measurements on lateral radiographs of the scapula.

Thomas Suter1, Nicola Krähenbühl2, C Kalebb Howell3, Yue Zhang4, Heath B Henninger5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate and reliable assessment of acromial tilt (ATA) and slope (ASA) angles have been important in the clinical evaluation of degenerative and traumatic rotator cuff tears. This study analyzed the influence of radiographic viewing perspective on the ATA and ASA and developed criteria to identify true lateral (TL) view radiographs.
METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) reconstructions of 52 scapulae without rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis were studied. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were aligned to obtain a TL view. In 10 random scapulae, incremental ante- and retroversion and up- and downward rotation views were generated (10° increments, ±30°), and ATA and ASA were measured by 2 observers. Clinically applicable criteria were developed and validated to identify TL views.
RESULTS: The mean ATA and ASA on TL views were 33°±4° (range 23°-42°) and 22°±7° (8°-43°), respectively. Mixed effect models showed that DRRs malpositioned in 20° and 30° anteversion and downward rotation decreased the ATA (P ≤ .030). DRRs malpositioned in anteversion and >10° of up- and downward rotation demonstrated a significantly decreased ASA (P ≤ .047). Intra- and interobserver reliability was excellent for TL views (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.95) but decreased with increasing viewing angle. Anatomic landmark criteria were capable of identifying TL-view radiographs with sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 82%.
CONCLUSION: Both ATA and ASA were significantly affected by malposition in anteversion and downward rotation of the scapula. Reliable ASA measurement was more susceptible in up- and downward rotation than the ATA. New visual criteria can identify TL-view radiographs and should be used in future studies to ensure consistency in ATA and ASA measurement.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D model; Acromion morphology; acromial slope; acromial tilt; computed tomography (CT) scan; digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs); impingement syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31784385      PMCID: PMC7170764          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  40 in total

1.  Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinematics.

Authors:  M Kebaetse; P McClure; N A Pratt
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Troubleshooting the supraspinatus outlet view.

Authors:  X A Duralde; S J Gauntt
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Osseous anatomy of the scapula.

Authors:  H P von Schroeder; S D Kuiper; M J Botte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Radiographic and geometric anatomy of the scapula.

Authors:  W J Mallon; H R Brown; J B Vogler; S Martinez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Excision of the acromion in treatment of the supraspinatus syndrome; report of 95 excisions.

Authors:  J R ARMSTRONG
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1949-08

Review 6.  A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age.

Authors:  Teun Teunis; Bart Lubberts; Brian T Reilly; David Ring
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.

Authors:  Chris D Bryce; Andrew C Davison; Gregory S Lewis; Li Wang; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.

Authors:  Matthew D Budge; Gregory S Lewis; Eric Schaefer; Stephanie Coquia; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Dennis Liem; Oliver Greshake; Juergen Hoeher; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Teemu V Karjalainen; Nitin B Jain; Cristina M Page; Tuomas A Lähdeoja; Renea V Johnston; Paul Salamh; Lauri Kavaja; Clare L Ardern; Arnav Agarwal; Per O Vandvik; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.