Literature DB >> 3178422

The histological grading of neoplasms.

D E Henson1.   

Abstract

The relation of tumor grade to cancer patient outcome was investigated for 15 anatomic sites using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md. Over 500,000 cases were available for review. In some cases, nine-year follow-up information was also available. The results showed that, stage for stage, the grade further subdivided the overall survival rates for each site into distinct subsets that were significantly different. The study confirms the concept of grade as applied to cancer and the relation of grade to survival. From the results, the conclusions are reached that grading is prognostically valuable, especially when analyzed with respect to survival in a population, and that the grade provides prognostic information in addition to the stage of disease. It is proposed that three grades be adopted to minimize statistical variation. The results are considered significant, since neither standard nor uniform guidelines have existed for grading that pertain to all sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3178422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  8 in total

1.  ACP Best Practice No 157. Guidelines for the laboratory handling of laryngectomy specimens.

Authors:  T R Helliwell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-10-31       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Factors predicting the axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: is axillary node clearance indicated in every breast cancer patient?: factors predicting the axillary lymphnode metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Amrut V Ashturkar; Gayatri S Pathak; Sanjay D Deshmukh; Harshal T Pandave
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Nuclear characteristics as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  V le Doussal; M Tubiana-Hulin; K Hacene; S Friedman; M Brunet
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Vimentin in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  V C de Araujo; D S Pinto Júnior; S O de Sousa; F D Nunes; N S de Araujo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems.

Authors:  M L Cintra; A Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Morphometrical malignancy grading is a valuable prognostic factor in invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  P Kronqvist; T Kuopio; P Jalava; Y Collan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Expression of RCAS1 correlates with urothelial bladder cancer malignancy.

Authors:  Wojciech Jóźwicki; Anna A Brożyna; Jerzy Siekiera; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.