| Literature DB >> 31783887 |
Shozo Kanezaki1,2, Masashi Miyazaki3, Toshinobu Ishihara1, Naoki Notani1,2, Tetsutaro Abe1, Yuhta Tsubouchi4, Masashi Kataoka5, Hiroshi Tsumura1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonunion in cases of open fracture is common. Both bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) have been used to enhance bone healing. We investigated the combination of BMP-2 and PTH and examined the effects on a rat model of open femoral fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Bone morphogenetic protein; Open fracture, Femur; Parathyroid hormone; Teriparatide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31783887 PMCID: PMC6884813 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1470-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Assessment of bony fusion with manual palpation
| Treatment group | No. assessed manually for fusion | Fused | Fusion rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Carrier alone | 11 | 2 | 18.2 |
| Group II | 1 μg rhBMP-2 | 12 | 4 | 33.3 |
| Group III | Carrier + PTH | 12 | 8 | 66.7* |
| Group IV | 1 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 11 | 7 | 63.6* |
| Group V | 10 μg rhBMP-2 | 11 | 9 | 81.8* |
| Group VI | 10 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 11 | 9 | 81.8* |
*p < 0.05 (vs group I)
Radiographic scores at 8 weeks
| Treatment group | No. studied radiographically | Score at 8 weeks (mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Carrier alone | 11 | 1.18 ± 1.40 |
| Group II | 1 μg rhBMP-2 | 12 | 1.75 ± 1.42 |
| Group III | Carrier + PTH | 12 | 2.42 ± 1.73 |
| Group IV | 1 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 11 | 2.55 ± 1.37 |
| Group V | 10 μg rhBMP-2 | 11 | 3.36 ± 1.21* |
| Group VI | 10 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 11 | 3.45 ± 1.04* |
*p < 0.05 (vs group I)
Fig. 1The A-P and lateral radiographs of the representative case in each group at 8 weeks. Fracture lines remained and fractured femurs were not fused in the group I rats (a), whereas abundant callus formation was seen at the fracture site of group II (b). Rats in groups III (c) and IV (d) showed bone union of fractured femurs. Rats in group V (e) showed bony union of the femur with an expanded callus. Rats in group VI (f) showed complete bony union with matured callus
Micro-CT based histomorphometry of femoral fracture at 8 weeks
| Treatment group | No. studied micro-CT | TV (mm3) | BV (mm3) | BV/TV (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Carrier alone | 6 | 607.83 ± 214.20 | 351.64 ± 111.81 | 58.26 ± 1.86 |
| Group II | 1 μg rhBMP-2 | 6 | 528.48 ± 45.28 | 325.40 ± 24.10 | 61.68 ± 3.05 |
| Group III | Carrier + PTH | 6 | 473.23 ± 44.46 | 316.85 ± 18.65 | 67.23 ± 4.29 |
| Group IV | 1 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 6 | 483.73 ± 43.25 | 323.01 ± 36.71 | 66.74 ± 4.26 |
| Group V | 10 μg rhBMP-2 | 6 | 480.45 ± 66.31 | 295.07 ± 34.61 | 61.88 ± 3.16* |
| Group VI | 10 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 6 | 440.52 ± 70.41 | 313.43 ± 54.46 | 71.14 ± 3.89* |
TV tissue volume, BV bone volume, BV/TV percent bone volume
*p < 0.05 (vs group 1)
Micro-CT based histomorphometry of femoral fracture at 8 weeks
| Treatment group | No. studied micro-CT | Tb.Th (mm) | Tb.N (1/mm) | Tb.Sp (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Carrier alone | 6 | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 1.01 ± 0.18 |
| Group II | 1 μg rhBMP-2 | 6 | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 0.93 ± 0.10 | 0.91 ± 0.18 |
| Group III | Carrier + PTH | 6 | 0.77 ± 0.11 | 0.88 ± 0.10 | 0.85 ± 0.12 |
| Group IV | 1 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 6 | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.94 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.23 |
| Group V | 10 μg rhBMP-2 | 6 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.05 |
| Group VI | 10 μg rhBMP-2 + PTH | 6 | 0.70 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.06 |
Tb.Th trabecular thickness, Tb.N trabecular number, Tb.Sp trabecular separation
Fig. 2Histological cross-section of the fractured rat femurs obtained 8 weeks after surgery. Group I showed partial cartilaginous tissue formation, but there was no evidence of fusion (a, b). Group II showed moderate new cartilaginous tissue formation and immature bone formation. Many of the observed chondrocyte cells exhibited expansion (c, d). Group III showed formation of contracted bone trabeculae. Although general mature bone formation had been observed, a moderate number of chondrocytes remained (e, f). Group IV exhibited well-developed bone trabeculae and bone marrow. Mature osteocytes were surrounded by bone marrow with increased cavity formation (g, h). In group V, abundant new bone tissue formed with the expansion of the bone marrow cavity. Although new bone tissue seemed to be mature compared with that of group II, immature chondrocytes remained (i, j). Group VI exhibited mature new bone formation with finely organized trabecular bone and multinuclear cells indicating osteoclasts, which implied bone remodeling (k, l)