Literature DB >> 31783804

Ultrasound assessment of tensile stress in carotid arteries of healthy human subjects with varying age.

Xianghong Luo1, Lianfang Du2, Zhaojun Li3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arterial remodeling is thought to reflect the adaptation of the vessel wall to mechanical and hemodynamic stimuli and contributes to the progression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Tensile stress (TS) is one of the mechanical properties of the artery wall. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tensile stress change (TS) of carotid artery with varying viscoelasticity in healthy subjects within two groups of different ages.
METHODS: Forty-five subjects were recruited and randomly assigned into the group at the age above 50 years and below 50 years. The carotid arteries were examined by ultrasonography, using the techniques of shear wave elastography (SWE), shear wave dispersion (SWD) and radiofrequency (RF) -based ultrasound. The following values, including elastic modulus (SWER) and viscous index (SWDR), as well as the peak and mean TS of the left and right carotid arteries (L-PTS, R-PTS, L-MTS and R-MTS) were measured. The correlations between SWER, SWDR and tensile stress were evaluated.
RESULTS: The SWER and SWDR of carotid arteries are lower in the subjects ≥50 years old than the subjects younger than 50 years (SWER, 10.29 ± 9.57 kPa VS 17.24 ± 14.07 kPa; SWDR, 11.99 ± 3.51 (m/s)/kHz VS 13.97 ± 3.71 (m/s)/kHz, P < 0.05). The R-PTS was lower in the group with younger age (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that SWER of carotid artery was positively correlated with the parameters of tensile stress, R-PTS, R-MTS, L-PTS and L-MTS(r = 0.218, r = 0.359, r = 0.209 and r = 0.369, respectively, P < 0.05). However, SWDR of carotid arteries was not significantly associated with TS.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic shear wave imaging could be used to quantitatively assess carotid viscoelasticity. The carotid TS was related to its elasticity while little related to its viscosity, suggesting that mechanical properties of the arterial wall might be better revealed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of our trial registration: 2018-06-11. Registered with the official website of China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR1800016590).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery; Shear wave dispersion; Shear wave elastography; Tensile stress; Ultrasonography; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31783804      PMCID: PMC6884773          DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0394-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Imaging        ISSN: 1471-2342            Impact factor:   1.930


Background

Cardiovascular disease is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. It is essential to recognize early changes in vascular function and morphology to help identify individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease. Arterial remodeling or dilatation of carotid arteries has been shown to be related to increased mechanical stress from high pulsatile loads, leading to breakdown of elastic fibers within the arterial wall [1, 2]. Arterial remodeling is a potentially important pathophysiologic change in the development of atherosclerosis, which acts to counteract the development of lumen compromise of large artery by mutual adaptation of diameter to wall thickening [3]. Carotid geometry and wall tensile stress can be evaluated at the carotid artery, because its simple geometry allows the application of Laplace’s law for wall stress estimation. Hypertension increases the tensile stress applied on the carotid artery, thus carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and stiffness, and favors atherosclerotic plaque progression [4]. The arterial wall has been known as one of the most intricate structures and presents a certain biomechanical property of viscoelasticity [5]. This behavior presents a non-linear mechanical relationship and attributes in part to fluid transport within the solid matrix [6, 7]. However, most of the arterial TS had been measured through biomechanical experiments in vitro, and little is known about the nature of the adjustments to the arterial viscoelasticity, which corresponds to the altered wall TS. In recent years, shear wave-based elastography techniques, such as shear wave elastography (SWE) and shear wave dispersion (SWD) have received wide attention for noninvasive assessment of elasticity and viscidity properties [8, 9]. This study was to assess the carotid TS and viscoelasticity by ultrasonic technologies and explored the relationship between them.

Methods

Study design and setting participants

The study was registered as a clinical trial (ChiCTR1800016590, 2018-06-11) approved by our Institutional Ethics Review Board (2017KY009). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study. Forty-five healthy subjects were enrolled from August 1, 2017 to May 1, 2018. They were selected based on the electronic medical records. Participants that have active bleeding, history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, vascular diseases of the extremities, immune diseases, severe liver, lung, kidney diseases, or malignant tumor were excluded. They were divided into 2 groups according to their ages: group A (≥50 years) and group B (< 50 years). Blood pressure was measured in the supine position after 10 min of rest and defined as the average of 3 consecutive systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood samples were obtained for the measurements of glucose, high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL) after 12 h of fasting.

Carotid artery B-mode ultrasound

After high-resolution common carotid artery (CCA) images were obtained, the viscoelasticity of the CCA was measured using an Aplio 900 ultrasound system (Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan) equipped with PVI-475BX curved abdominal transducer (frequency range:1–8-MHz and mid frequency: 5.0 MHz) [10]. The ultrasound image was frozen at electrocardiographic end diastole (R-wave) by electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering. Five 2 mm circular regions of interest (ROI) were selectively placed on anterior and posterior walls of bilateral carotid arteries (1 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation). The motion of vascular wall for 10–20 cardiac cycles was recorded and measurements were taken during the systolic phase. Shear wave elastic modulus (SWER) and shear wave dispersion (SWDR) were measured after the R wave of the ECG. The arterial shear wave profiles, including the elastic map (Fig. 1a), propagation map (Fig. 1b), two-dimensional reference map (Fig. 1c) and shear wave dispersion map (Fig. 1d) were obtained with single-shot acquisition and displayed on QuadView.
Fig. 1

The arterial shear wave profiles were displayed by. QuadView, including 4 maps for: a elastic map, b propagation map, c two-dimensional reference map and d shear wave dispersion map.

The arterial shear wave profiles were displayed by. QuadView, including 4 maps for: a elastic map, b propagation map, c two-dimensional reference map and d shear wave dispersion map. The carotid structure and tensile stress were measured using Mylab Twice ultrasound system (Esaote, Firenze, Italy) equipped with a LA523 linear transducer (4–13 MHz) and the software, which enables the analysis of radiofrequency-based ultrasound images. The common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and inner diameter (CCID) were measured by radiofrequency-based ultrasound tracking of the carotid wall displacement for at least six cardiac cycles and the mean values were calculated automatically by the software. The carotid peak tensile stress (PTS) and mean tensile stress (MTS) were calculated according to Laplace’s law using the equations: (PTS=SBP×(CCIDR/2)/CIMT (mmHg), MTS = MBP×(CCIDT /2)/CIMT (mmHg) [11]. SBP was systolic blood pressure, while MBP was the mean blood pressure and calculated by (SBP + 2 × DBP)/3. CCIDR was the inner diameter of common carotid artery at the end of systolic phase, while CCIDT was the inner diameter of common carotid artery at the end of diastolic phase. 1dyne/cm2 = 7.5 × 10− 4 mmHg.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 statistical analysis software. The continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using Student’s t-tests, while categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using chi-squared test. Agreement of measurement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between carotid viscoelasticity and TS. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics

The baseline characteristics of two age groups were summarized in Table 1. The mean height of the subjects in group A is less than that of group A. The mean SBP and DBP were higher in group A (all P < 0.05) than group B. No significant difference of gender ratio, weight, body mass index, fasting glucose, TG, TC, LDL-C was found between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
Table 1

Characteristics of two age groups

VariableGroup A(n = 23)Group B(n = 22)t /χ2P
Gender (F/M)11/1211/110.0230.879
Height, cm162.9 ± 7.1167.5 ± 7.9−2.3010.025
Weight, kg68.3 ± 17.366.7 ± 15.60.3480.729
Body mass index, kg/m225.8 ± 7.423.5 ± 4.11.4440.154
SBP, mmHg139.6 ± 11.1125.7 ± 9.15.102<0.001
DBP, mmHg87.9 ± 7.279.7 ± 6.14.607<0.001
Glucose, m mol/L6.1 ± 1.615.2 ± 1.211.0010.327
Total cholesterol, mmol /L4.6 ± 1.114.4 ± 0.810.7630.456
Triglycerides, mmol/L1.7 ± 1.311.2 ± 0.811.120.275
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L2.9 ± 1.012.7 ± 0.810.770.433
Diabetes mellitus (n)310.1560.693
Hypertension (n)530.0440.833

1 mmHg =0.133 kPa

Characteristics of two age groups 1 mmHg =0.133 kPa

Geometry, viscoelasticic feature and tensile stress of carotid arteries in two groups

The SWER and SWDR, which are the two parameters that represent the carotid viscoelasticity, were significantly lower in the group A than those in the group B (P = 0.040 and 0.043, respectively). The bilateral CIMT, CCIDT and CCIDR, which are used to characterize the geometry of the carotid arteries, were all higher in the group of subjects older than 50 years (all P < 0.05). The mean PTS of the right carotid arteries was lower in the group A (P < 0.05), while no significant differences of the PTS of left carotid arteries and bilateral MTS were found between the two groups (all P>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of carotid viscoelasticity, structure and tensile stress between groups

VariableGroup A(n = 23)Group B(n = 22)tP
Viscoelasticity
 SWER kPa10.29 ± 9.5717.24 ± 14.07−2.2360.040
 SWDR (m/s)/kHz11.99 ± 3.5113.97 ± 3.71−2.1290.043
Structure
 R-CIMT (μm)677.6 ± 138.4449.1 ± 131.96.321<0.001
 L-CIMT (μm)674.7 ± 119.8503.9 ± 193.23.976<0.001
 R-CCIDT (mm)8.23 ± 0.896.43 ± 0.405.946<0.001
 L-CCIDT (mm)7.93 ± 0.996.50 ± 0.417.575<0.001
 R-CCIDR (mm)8.57 ± 1.037.00 ± 0.557.095<0.001
 L-CCIDR (mm)8.20 ± 1.097.04 ± 0.565.000<0.001
 R-CCAD (μm)339.9 ± 142.7571.1 ± 148.2−5.946<0.001
 L-CCAD (μm)273.6 ± 98.6535.4 ± 153.9−7.575<0.001
Tensile stress
 R-PTS (mmHg)920.4 ± 160.31073.6 ± 285.8−2.4740.017
 R-MTS (mmHg)783.8 ± 189.9884.4 ± 224.0−1.8120.076
 L-PTS (mmHg)648.1 ± 117.4723.8 ± 195.5−1.7580.084
 L-MTS (mmHg)600.9 ± 108.2644.6 ± 168.2−1.1560.253

SWE Shear wave elastic modulus in electrocardiographic R wave, SWD Shear wave dispersion in electrocardiographic R wave, L-CIMT Left common carotid intima-media thickness, R-CIMT Right common carotid intima-media thickness; L-CCID and R-CCID Left and right common carotid inners at end of diastole, respectively, L-CCID and R-CCID Left and right common carotid inner diameters at end of systole, respectively, L-CCAD and R-CCAD Difference of CCID between diastole and systole on left and right, R-PTS and R-MTS Right carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress, L-PTS and L-MTS Left carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress

1 dyne/cm2 = 7.5 × 10−4 mmHg

Comparison of carotid viscoelasticity, structure and tensile stress between groups SWE Shear wave elastic modulus in electrocardiographic R wave, SWD Shear wave dispersion in electrocardiographic R wave, L-CIMT Left common carotid intima-media thickness, R-CIMT Right common carotid intima-media thickness; L-CCID and R-CCID Left and right common carotid inners at end of diastole, respectively, L-CCID and R-CCID Left and right common carotid inner diameters at end of systole, respectively, L-CCAD and R-CCAD Difference of CCID between diastole and systole on left and right, R-PTS and R-MTS Right carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress, L-PTS and L-MTS Left carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress 1 dyne/cm2 = 7.5 × 10−4 mmHg

Correlation between the carotid viscoelasticity and tensile stress

Figure 2 and Table 3 showed that SWER has a positive correlation with R-PTS, R- MTS, L-PTS and L-MTS (r = 0.218, 0.359, 0.209,0.369, respectively, all P<0.05), whereas no correlation was found between the SWDR and the parameters of TS (all P>0.05).
Fig. 2

Correlation between the carotid viscoelasticity and tensile stress. a SWER correlated positively with right and left carotid peak tensile stress, respectively. b SWER correlated positively with right and left carotid mean tensile stress, respectively

Table 3

Correlation analysis between carotid viscoelasticity tensile stress [r(P)]

VariableSWERSWDR
All subjectsGroup AGroup BAll subjectsGroup AGroup B
R-PTS0.218 (0.021)0.137 (0.313)0.159 (0.241)0.096 (0.314)−0.404 (0.002)0.172 (0.204)
R-MTS0.359 (0.001)0.276 (0.040)0.353 (0.008)0.054 (0.568)0.068 (0.619)−0.062 (0.650)
L-PTS0.209 (0.027)0.196 (0148)0.142 (0.298)0.067 (0.485)−0.352 (0.008)0.153 (0.259)
L-MTS0.369 (0.001)0.415 (0.001)0.313 (0.019)0.005 (0.956)0.086 (0.530)−0.098 (0.474)

SWE Shear wave elastic modulus in electrocardiographic R wave, SWD Shear wave dispersion in electrocardiographic R wave, R-PTS and R-MTS Right carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress, L-PTS and L-MTS Left carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress

Correlation between the carotid viscoelasticity and tensile stress. a SWER correlated positively with right and left carotid peak tensile stress, respectively. b SWER correlated positively with right and left carotid mean tensile stress, respectively Correlation analysis between carotid viscoelasticity tensile stress [r(P)] SWE Shear wave elastic modulus in electrocardiographic R wave, SWD Shear wave dispersion in electrocardiographic R wave, R-PTS and R-MTS Right carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress, L-PTS and L-MTS Left carotid peak tensile stress and mean tensile stress

Reproducibility analysis

A week later, a total of 22 subjects were randomly selected and involved in the reproducibility evaluation. SWDR and SWER were measured repeatedly by the same investigator. The Bland–Altman plots showed the good agreement between the parameters obtained by two separate measurements (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Bland-Altman plots for agreement in SWER (a) and SWDR (b) measurement

Bland-Altman plots for agreement in SWER (a) and SWDR (b) measurement

Discussion

The cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are still the number 1 cause of death globally. However, it is known that the onset and progression of these diseases can be predicted by the biomechanical features of large arteries, such as carotid arteries. Therefore, some of the predictors, such as mechanical stress and strain are very important for identifying the potential risk over the processes of arterial pathologies. TS, a parameter derived from certain measurements by using Laplace’s law, is associated with the inflation pressure, wall thickness and inner diameter [12]. In addition, TS of arterial wall is significantly related to the viscoelasticity of arteries. Our study shows that SWER and SWDR, the two parameters that represent the viscoelasticity of arteries were lower in the subjects older than 50 years that those of the younger subjects. We also found that no significant difference of PTS and MTS exist between the two groups, but the PTS of the right carotid arteries in the group with older ages was lower than the younger ones. The PTS and MTS, were positively corelated with SWER, but no correlation was found between PTS and SWDR, which implys that the arterial elasticity may have some implication in the change of tensile stress. The geometry changes of the carotid artery are closely related to the mechanical properties. CIMT, which is usually measured by noninvasive ultrasound, is strongly associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and used for evaluating progression: regression of atherosclerosis and for predicting arterial remolding and subsequent clinical complications [13, 14]. We measured the CIMT using radiofrequency-based ultrasound technique. The two-dimensional vascular structure can be clearly visualized, which allows the real-time measurement of CIMT within six cardiac cycles, with a resolution of 10 μm. This technology a reliable method for the clinical evaluation of arterial structure and function [15]. Our study shows that the CIMT increased in the subjects older than 50 years, suggesting that the carotid arterial remolding has some relationship with ages. CIMT measurements respectively made on the left and right carotid arteries could represent separate phenotypes because their patterns of associations with risk factors are different. For example, on the left carotid artery, the CIMT is thicker and shows stronger associations with blood lipid, glucose and lower estrogens; while on the right carotid artery, the CIMT is thinner and significantly related to hemodynamics, such as hypertension and heart rate. These results suggest that the weights of risk factors are different on left and right carotid arteries [16, 17]. In this study, the CCID was enlarged in the older ones, while CCAD, i.e. the difference of CCID between diastole and systole was decreased. These results also exhibited that carotid artery occurred remodeling with age. The study by Carallo et al. [18] demonstrated that the circumferential wall tension (WT) of carotid arteries significantly increased with age. Conversely, the present results showed the TS did not parallel the increase in CIMT and CCID. The PTS of right carotid arteries is lower in the group with older ages, and no remarkable difference was found for the parameters of bilateral MTS and left PTS. Various reasons for participating in that: (1) Mechanical models of artery, such as WT and TS, derived from Laplace’s law can be used to relate the arterial inner radius (r) and internal pressure (P). The WT was defined as P × r [19]. The WT model assumes a very thin wall, and then handles the pressure, which does not take into account wall thickness. The TS, being a corrected Laplace model, was P × r/CIMT. TS could reflect the tensile response in circumference [11]. (2) The mechanical stretch can induce structural changes in the arterial wall, including VSMC hyperplasia and hypertrophy, as well as increased deposition of ECM collagen and elastin and result in arterial remodeling [20, 21]. On the other hand, the arterial remodeling could act on its mechanical properties [22, 23]. (3) The arterial tissue is viscoelasticity and show non-linear. However, the arteries are of viscoelastic properties and exhibit the nonlinear stress-stain relations [5]. Several new non-invasive techniques have been used to study arterial elasticity, such as dimensional speckle-tracking imaging [24], ultrasonic radiofrequency tracking [25] and shear wave elastography [26-28]. However, in vivo, it is difficult to study the arterial viscidity due to its complex temporal changing behavior. Shear wave elasticity imaging may noninvasively evaluate the properties of soft tissues based on a group shear wave speed assuming that tissue is elastic; however, soft tissues are known to be viscoelastic, meaning the shear wave speed is dependent on the wave’s frequency content. Over the last years, there has been significant innovation in the area of describing the viscoelastic properties of soft tissue by the frequency-dependent: shear wave dispersion (SWD, the change in speed with frequency) [29]. In this work, the viscoelastic properties of carotid artery were evaluated by SWD. The SWER and SWDR decreased with age. In addition, the TSs were positively connected with SWER, while were not related to SWDR. This suggested that the arterial elasticity contributed its mechanical behavior rather than viscidity. The vascular smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix proteins collagen and elastin play a crucial role in the viscoelastic properties, i.e. their spatial organization and interaction dominate the macroscopic non-linear vessel properties [5, 30]. Higher vascular stiffness is typically found in older subjects because the elastic lamellae decreases with age, while the connective tissue and collagen fibers increase [31]. The mechanical characteristics of arteries were related to local pathologies of the arterial system, while wall viscosity change reflects a more general influence of age and diseases [32]. There are limitations for this study. We included a small sample size of 45 subjects in this study. In addition, the curved abdominal transducer was used to evaluate the carotid viscoelasticity, while transducer of linear array could provide better images and measurements. We only include the subjects with healthy carotid arteries. In the future, we will explore the value of using this technique to characterize the tensile stress features of the carotid arteries with pathology, such as atherosclerosis.

Conclusion

Ultrasonic shear wave imaging could be used to quantitatively assess carotid viscoelasticity. The tensile stress of carotid arteries is closely related to the elastic properties of aging carotid arteries, but no apparent correlation with the viscosity of carotid arteries, suggesting that mechanical properties of the arterial wall with age might be better revealed.
  30 in total

1.  Differences in left and right carotid intima-media thickness and the associated risk factors.

Authors:  X Luo; Y Yang; T Cao; Z Li
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Compensatory increase in common carotid artery diameter. Relation to blood pressure and artery intima-media thickness in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  J F Polak; R A Kronmal; G S Tell; D H O'Leary; P J Savage; J M Gardin; G H Rutan; N O Borhani
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Carotid Endarterectomy with Autoarterial Remodeling of Bifurcation of the Common Carotid Artery and Carotid Endarterectomy with Patch Closure: Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Pavel Ignatenko; Olga Novikova; Alexander Gostev; Vladimir Starodubtsev; Galina Zeidlits; Konstantin Kuznetsov; Alexandra Starodubtseva; Andrey Karpenko
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Ultrasound Assessment of Intima-media Thickness and Diameter of Carotid Arteries in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis or Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Zhao-Jun Li; Lian-Fang Du; Yan Qin; Ji-Bin Liu; Xiang-Hong Luo
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

5.  Carotid plaque with expansive arterial remodeling is a risk factor for ischemic complication following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Daina Kashiwazaki; Naoya Kuwayama; Naoki Akioka; Kyo Noguchi; Satoshi Kuroda
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Estimation of Biomechanical Properties of Normal and Atherosclerotic Common Carotid Arteries.

Authors:  Effat Soleimani; Manijhe Mokhtari-Dizaji; Nasser Fatouraee; Hazhir Saberi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.495

7.  Favorable cardiac and aortic remodeling in olmesartan-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Caroline Fernandes-Santos; Leonardo de Souza Mendonça; Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Impact of Intima-Media Thickness Progression in the Common Carotid Arteries on the Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Suita Study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kokubo; Makoto Watanabe; Aya Higashiyama; Yoko M Nakao; Fumiaki Nakamura; Yoshihiro Miyamoto
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Eva S Peper; Gustav J Strijkers; Katja Gazzola; Wouter V Potters; Abdallah G Motaal; Ilse K Luirink; Barbara A Hutten; Albert Wiegman; Pim van Ooij; Bert-Jan H van den Born; Aart J Nederveen; Bram F Coolen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Staging of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and shear wave elastography in the same individuals.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Hyun Sik Woo; Mi Hye Yu; Ijin Joo; Eun Sun Lee; Ji Young Sohn; Kyung Boon Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.