Literature DB >> 31783467

Many, large and early: Hunting pressure on wild boar relates to simple metrics of hunting effort.

Pablo Vajas1, Clément Calenge2, Emmanuelle Richard3, Julien Fattebert4, Cyril Rousset5, Sonia Saïd6, Eric Baubet7.   

Abstract

Wild boar populations have increased dramatically over the last decades throughout Europe and in France in particular. While hunting is considered the most efficient way to control game populations, many local conflicts persist after the hunting period due to remaining high densities of wild boar despite the large number of animals culled every year. Therefore, increasing the efficiency of hunting is a timely issue. Herein, we assessed how hunting effort can be measured, and we determined whether the hunting effort carried out by hunters explains the observed hunting pressure. We measured the characteristics and results of all hunts that occurred in the experimental forest of Châteauvillain-Arc-en-Barrois (Northeastern France), and we modelled the number of animals culled as a function of the hunting effort, measured by the number of beaters, hunters, and dogs, as well as the size of the hunting area. We also accounted for variables suspected to affect the hunting efficiency achieved with a given effort, such as time of day (AM/PM), the month during which hunting occurred. We found that more posted hunters, larger hunted areas, and hunts carried out early in the season, i.e. before February, increased the number of culled animals. Our model can be used by wildlife managers to adjust hunting effort in order to reach the hunting pressure expected to meet management objectives.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; Beater; Dog; France; Hunter; Sus scrofa; Wildlife management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31783467     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the European Union: (September 2020 to August 2021).

Authors:  Joaquín Vicente Baños; Anette Boklund; Andrey Gogin; Christian Gortázar; Vittorio Guberti; Georgina Helyes; Maria Kantere; Daniela Korytarova; Annick Linden; Marius Masiulis; Aleksandra Miteva; Ioana Neghirla; Edvins Oļševskis; Sasa Ostojic; Satran Petr; Christoph Staubach; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Arvo Viltrop; Grzegorz Wozniakowski; Alessandro Broglia; José Abrahantes Cortiñas; Sofie Dhollander; Lina Mur; Alexandra Papanikolaou; Yves Van der Stede; Gabriele Zancanaro; Karl Ståhl
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Foodborne Zoonoses Common in Hunted Wild Boars.

Authors:  Maria Fredriksson-Ahomaa; Laura London; Teresa Skrzypczak; Tuija Kantala; Ilona Laamanen; Mia Biström; Leena Maunula; Tuija Gadd
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Assessing mammal trapping standards in wild boar drop-net capture.

Authors:  Roser Velarde; Gregorio Mentaberre; Carles Conejero; Jorge Ramón López-Olvera; Carlos González-Crespo; Arián Ráez-Bravo; Raquel Castillo-Contreras; Stefania Tampach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Beniamino Cenci-Goga; Alberto Amicabile; Musafiri Karama; Saeed El-Ashram; Cristina Saraiva; Juan García-Díez; Simone Finotti; Viviana Genna; Giampaolo Moretti; Riccardo Murari; Riccardo Muliari; Sabrina Bonizzato; Erica Lugoboni; Sabina Cassini; Caterina Dal-Ben; Luca Grispoldi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.