Literature DB >> 3178334

Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass.

T R DeMeester1, K E Johansson, I Franze, E Eypasch, C T Lu, J E McGill, G Zaninotto.   

Abstract

Over a 17-year period, 92 patients with esophageal disease underwent colon interposition or bypass, with each operation performed by the same surgeon. The indication was cure of cancer in 20 patients, relief of dysphagia in 55 (cancer in 17 patients and benign in 38), loss of gastrointestinal (G.I.) continuity in ten, and tracheoesophageal fistula in seven patients (malignant in five, benign in 2). The thirty-day operative mortality rate was 5%, and the hospital mortality rate was 9%. Graft necrosis occurred in seven of 92 patients, four of whom later underwent a successful second reconstruction. Thirteen patients required subsequent revisional surgery. In 85 patients, the left colon based on the inferior mesenteric artery was used, and in seven, the right colon was used. Technical insights were gained to help preserve the blood supply to the graft and improve its function in transporting food. Thirty-four patients were available for interview 2-17 years after operation (median of 5 years) 28 of whom had benign disease, and six of whom had malignant disease); 82% of the patients felt they were cured of their preoperative symptoms, 18% improved, and none worsened. Eighty-eight per cent of the patients were able to receive an unrestricted diet. All patients except one were satisfied with the results of surgery, and, asked what they would do if they had to make the choice again, all responded that they would have the operation. Twenty-six of the interviewed patients had their eating ability evaluated with a test meal and the transit time of a liquid and solid barium bolus measured. Compared to controls, patients with colon interpositions consumed a smaller capacity meal over a longer period of time and were not dependent on liquids to flush the food through the colon graft. A colon interposition provides good quality of deglutition, is very durable, and is the organ of choice for patients who require an esophageal substitute and are potential candidates for long survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3178334      PMCID: PMC1493741          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198810000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  The effect of posture on the emptying of the intrathoracic vagotomized stomach.

Authors:  R A Hinder
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Duodenogastrocolic reflux after colonic interposition measurement using scintigraphic method.

Authors:  J Isolauri; M O Koskinen; L Pöyhöen; A Uusitalo; H Markkula
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-02

3.  Occurrence of peptic ulcer in colon used for esophageal replacement.

Authors:  J A Malcolm
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Reconstruction of the oesophagus.

Authors:  R Belsey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Acid-barium swallows in the radiographic evaluation of clinical esophagitis.

Authors:  M W Donner; M L Silbiger; P Hookman; T R Hendrix
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Long-segment colon substitution for the esophagus.

Authors:  E W Wilkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Colonic interposition for esophageal substitution.

Authors:  R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-03
  7 in total
  34 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Risk factors of reflux esophagitis in the cervical remnant following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazuhito Yajima; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tatsuo Kanda; Atsushi Matsuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury.

Authors:  Julián Alberto Saldaña-Cortés; Francisco Larios-Arceo; Emilio Prieto-Díaz-Chávez; Eliseo Portilla De Buen; Salvador González-Mercado; Andrea Socorro Alvarez-Villaseñor; Manuel Rodrigo Prieto-Aldape; Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco; Alejandro González-Ojeda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results.

Authors:  Abdelkader Boukerrouche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Recurrent oesophageal cancer complicated by tracheo-oesophageal fistula: improved palliation by means of parallel tracheal and oesophageal stenting.

Authors:  Michael Schweigert; Maria Posada-González; Attila Dubecz; Dietmar Ofner; Herbert Muschweck; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-29

Review 6.  Esophageal reconstruction with colon tissue.

Authors:  Takushi Yasuda; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Community-acquired pneumonia during long-term follow-up of patients after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of incidence and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Takaaki Hanyu; Tatsuo Kanda; Kazuhito Yajima; Yoshinari Tanabe; Shintaro Komukai; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tsutomu Suzuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Adenocarcinoma arising in a colonic interposition following a total gastrectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kuwabara; Masahiro Kimura; Akira Mitsui; Hideaki Ishiguro; Keisuke Tomoda; Yoichiro Mori; Ryo Ogawa; Koshiro Harata; Takeyasu Katada; Yoshitaka Fujii
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Transhiatal esophageal resection for corrosive injury.

Authors:  Narendar Mohan Gupta; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Gastro-bronchial fistula closed by endoscopic fistula plug (with video).

Authors:  Ahmed Sharata; Neil H Bhayani; Christy M Dunst; Ashwin A Kurian; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.