H Hofstede1, T P C Franke1, R P A van Eijk2, F J G Backx1, E Kemler3, B M A Huisstede4. 1. Brain Center, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2. Brain Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Consumer Safety Institute (VeiligheidNL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Brain Center, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: B.M.A.Huisstede@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate which preventive measures runners use when preparing for a half- or full-marathon and whether the use of these measures at baseline and during the preparation-period differs between runners who sustained no/non-substantial running-related injuries (NSIRs) or substantial running-related injuries (SIRs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 16-week period before the Utrecht Marathon. PARTICIPANTS: Runners who subscribed for the half- or full-marathon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of RRIs was registered every 2-weeks, using the Dutch version of the Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) questionnaire on Health Problems. The OSTRC was used to differentiate between runners with SIRs (question 2/3 score>12) and NSIRs (question 2/3 score<13). The use of different preventive measures, was registered every 4-weeks. RESULTS: 51.6% of the runners reported at least one RRI in the 12-months prior to this study (history of RRIs). The SIRs with a history of RRIs more often asked for running shoe advice than NSIRs with a history of RRIs (67.9%vs43.4%, P < 0.05); 18.9% of the SIRs with a history of RRIs used supportive materials for knee and/or ankle versus 0% of NSIRs with a history of RRIs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SIRs with a history of RRIs might be using their preventive measures for symptom reduction or secondary prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate which preventive measures runners use when preparing for a half- or full-marathon and whether the use of these measures at baseline and during the preparation-period differs between runners who sustained no/non-substantial running-related injuries (NSIRs) or substantial running-related injuries (SIRs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 16-week period before the Utrecht Marathon. PARTICIPANTS: Runners who subscribed for the half- or full-marathon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of RRIs was registered every 2-weeks, using the Dutch version of the Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) questionnaire on Health Problems. The OSTRC was used to differentiate between runners with SIRs (question 2/3 score>12) and NSIRs (question 2/3 score<13). The use of different preventive measures, was registered every 4-weeks. RESULTS: 51.6% of the runners reported at least one RRI in the 12-months prior to this study (history of RRIs). The SIRs with a history of RRIs more often asked for running shoe advice than NSIRs with a history of RRIs (67.9%vs43.4%, P < 0.05); 18.9% of the SIRs with a history of RRIs used supportive materials for knee and/or ankle versus 0% of NSIRs with a history of RRIs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SIRs with a history of RRIs might be using their preventive measures for symptom reduction or secondary prevention.
Authors: Karsten Hollander; Anna Lina Rahlf; Jan Wilke; Christopher Edler; Simon Steib; Astrid Junge; Astrid Zech Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 11.136