Literature DB >> 31782586

The effects of clinical decision support systems on insulin use: A systematic review.

Pengli Jia1,2, Pengyan Jia3, JingJing Chen4, Pujing Zhao2, Mingming Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is a computerized system using case-based reasoning to assist clinicians in assessing disease status, in selecting appropriate therapy or in making other clinical decisions. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs or trials) have shown that CDSSs have the potential to improve the insulin use, but the evidence was conflicting and uncertain. The purpose of our study was to determine whether a CDSS improves the use of insulin.
METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to October 2018. The quality assessment was based on the risk of bias criteria of the Cochrane Handbook.
RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs, involving 7653 participants, were included. Thirteen of those trials (54.2%) used a computerized algorithm or a computer-assisted insulin protocol for insulin dose and therapy adjustment, of which 30.8% (four of 13) found significant changes. Of 10 trials that measured mean blood glucose levels and the 11 trials reported HbA1c, the computerized insulin dose adjustment resulted in lower mean blood glucose levels in 70.0% (seven of 10) and 36.4% (four of 11) of RCTs, respectively. Additionally, a significant reduction of hyperglycaemia events was reported in three of six RCTs. The evidence in a majority of the 24 RCTs was of moderate quality.
CONCLUSIONS: CDSSs have the potential to improve the insulin use and blood glucose control in a clinical setting. The methodologies in these studies were of mixed quality. Better designed and longer-term studies are required to ensure a larger and more reliable evidence base on the effects of CDSS intervention on insulin use.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDSS; clinical decision support systems; insulin use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31782586     DOI: 10.1111/jep.13291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  2 in total

1.  How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadeghi-Ghyassi; Shahla Damanabi; Leila R Kalankesh; Stijn Van de Velde; Mohammad-Reza Feizi-Derakhshi; Sakineh Hajebrahimi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  Evaluation Framework for Successful Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Mengting Ji; Georgi Z Genchev; Hengye Huang; Ting Xu; Hui Lu; Guangjun Yu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.