| Literature DB >> 31782315 |
Cléa Melenotte1,2, Matthieu Million1,2, Didier Raoult1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: Coxiella burnetii infection is still challenging physicians, mainly because no international coordination has been stated to standardize the therapeutic strategy and improve the clinical outcomes.Areas covered: Based on the recent knowledge on Q fever, we review here the clinical practices from Q fever diagnosis to therapy. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar to perform the qualitative synthesis.Expert opinion: Four major critical points are highlighted in this review. The first point is that Q fever diagnosis has been reviewed in the light of the new diagnosis tools, including molecular biology, transthoracic echocardiography, and 18F-FDG-PET/CT-scan imaging. Q fever diagnosis results from the presence of a microbiological criterion in addition to a lesional criterion. Second, the identification of the anticardiolipin antibodies as a novel biological predictive marker for acute Q fever complications (hemophagocytic syndrome, acute Q fever endocarditis, alithiasic cholecystitis, hepatitis, and meningitis). Third, the observation of a coincidence between Q fever and non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has made persistent C. burnetii infection a risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Finally, we expose here the close follow-up we proposed from the French National Reference Center for patients with Q fever infection to detect relapse and complications.Entities:
Keywords: Coxiella burnetii; Q fever; diagnosis; treatment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31782315 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1699055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ISSN: 1478-7210 Impact factor: 5.091