Literature DB >> 31781968

How do data-mining models consider arsenic contamination in sediments and variables importance?

Fahimeh Mirchooli1, Alireza Motevalli1,2, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi3, Maziar Mohammadi1, Prosun Bhattacharya4,5, Fatemeh Fadia Maghsood1,2, John P Tiefenbacher6.   

Abstract

Arsenic (As) is one of the most important dangerous elements as more than 100 million of people are exposed to risk, globally. The permissible threshold of As for drinking water is 10 μg/L according to both the WHO's drinking water guidelines and the Iranian national standard. However, several studies have indicated that As concentrations exceed this threshold value in several regions of Iran. This research evaluates an As-susceptible region, the Tajan River watershed, using the following data-mining models: multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), functional data analysis (FDA), support vector machine (SVM), generalized linear model (GLM), multivariate discriminant analysis (MDA), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). This study considers 12 factors for elevated As concentrations: land use, drainage density, profile curvature, plan curvature, slope length, slope degree, topographic wetness index, erosion, village density, distance from villages, precipitation, and lithology. The susceptibility mapping was conducted using training (70%) and validation (30%). The results of As contamination in sediment showed that classifications into 4 levels of concentration are very similar for two models of GLM and FDA. The GBM calculated the areas of highest arsenic contamination risk by MARS and SVM with percentages of 30.0% and 28.7%, respectively. FDA, GLM, MARS, and MDA models calculated the areas of lowest risk to be 3.3%, 23.0%, 72.0%, 25.2%, and 26.1%, respectively. The results of ROC curve reveal that the MARS, SVM, and MDA had the highest accuracies with area under the curve ROC values of 84.6%, 78.9%, and 79.5%, respectively. Land use, lithology, erosion, and elevation were the most important predictors of contamination potential with a value of 0.6, 0.59, 0.57, and 0.56, respectively. These are the most important factors. Finally, these data-mining methods can be used as appropriate, inexpensive, and feasible options to identify As-susceptible areas and can guide managers to reduce contamination in sediment of the environment and the food chain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Data-mining; GIS-based mapping; Human health; Iran; LVQ

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31781968     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7979-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  24 in total

1.  The quantities of cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic entering the U.K. environment from human activities.

Authors:  M Hutton; C Symon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  River suspended sediment modelling using the CART model: A comparative study of machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Bahram Choubin; Hamid Darabi; Omid Rahmati; Farzaneh Sajedi-Hosseini; Bjørn Kløve
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Chemical structure of arsenic and chromium in CCA-treated wood: implications of environmental weathering.

Authors:  Peter S Nico; Scott E Fendorf; Yvette W Lowney; Stewart E Holm; Michael V Ruby
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Arsenic and manganese contamination of drinking water resources in Cambodia: coincidence of risk areas with low relief topography.

Authors:  Johanna Buschmann; Michael Berg; Caroline Stengel; Mickey L Sampson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques.

Authors:  Memet Varol
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Growth of Jatropha curcas on heavy metal contaminated soil amended with industrial wastes and Azotobacter. A greenhouse study.

Authors:  G P Kumar; S K Yadav; P R Thawale; S K Singh; A A Juwarkar
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Pathology related to chronic arsenic exposure.

Authors:  Jose A Centeno; Florabel G Mullick; Leonor Martinez; Norbert P Page; Herman Gibb; David Longfellow; Claudia Thompson; Elena R Ladich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Increased mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis in young adults after exposure to arsenic in utero and in early childhood.

Authors:  Allan H Smith; Guillermo Marshall; Yan Yuan; Catterina Ferreccio; Jane Liaw; Ondine von Ehrenstein; Craig Steinmaus; Michael N Bates; Steve Selvin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Potential health risk consequences of heavy metal concentrations in surface water, shrimp (Macrobrachium macrobrachion) and fish (Brycinus longipinnis) from Benin River, Nigeria.

Authors:  Lawrence I Ezemonye; Princewill O Adebayo; Alex A Enuneku; Isioma Tongo; Emmanuel Ogbomida
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-11-17

10.  A gradient boosting algorithm for survival analysis via direct optimization of concordance index.

Authors:  Yifei Chen; Zhenyu Jia; Dan Mercola; Xiaohui Xie
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.